宪法转向:英国法律中版权与言论自由的平衡

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/17577632.2022.2121128
R. Arnold
{"title":"宪法转向:英国法律中版权与言论自由的平衡","authors":"R. Arnold","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2022.2121128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article considers case law from the courts of England and Wales on the balance between copyright and freedom of expression and how this has developed over the last 50 years or so. Although there has been no fundamental change in the approach of the English courts to this issue, the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union have led to an acceptance that decisions in cases involving conflicts between copyright and freedom of expression need to be grounded in the European human rights framework. Like the CJEU, the English courts have generally preferred to treat human rights considerations as influencing the interpretation and application of the internal mechanisms in copyright law rather than as supplying an external corrective mechanism. In that sense progress has been made towards the constitutionalisation of copyright law.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The constitutional turn: balancing copyright and freedom of expression in English law\",\"authors\":\"R. Arnold\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17577632.2022.2121128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article considers case law from the courts of England and Wales on the balance between copyright and freedom of expression and how this has developed over the last 50 years or so. Although there has been no fundamental change in the approach of the English courts to this issue, the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union have led to an acceptance that decisions in cases involving conflicts between copyright and freedom of expression need to be grounded in the European human rights framework. Like the CJEU, the English courts have generally preferred to treat human rights considerations as influencing the interpretation and application of the internal mechanisms in copyright law rather than as supplying an external corrective mechanism. In that sense progress has been made towards the constitutionalisation of copyright law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Media Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Media Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2022.2121128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2022.2121128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了英格兰和威尔士法院关于版权和言论自由之间平衡的判例法,以及这一平衡在过去50年左右的发展过程。尽管英国法院对这一问题的处理方式没有根本性的改变,1998年《人权法》的颁布和欧洲联盟法院的判例使人们认识到,涉及版权和言论自由之间冲突的案件的裁决需要以欧洲人权框架为基础。与CJEU一样,英国法院通常倾向于将人权考虑视为影响版权法内部机制的解释和应用,而不是提供外部纠正机制。从这个意义上说,版权法的宪法化已经取得了进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The constitutional turn: balancing copyright and freedom of expression in English law
ABSTRACT This article considers case law from the courts of England and Wales on the balance between copyright and freedom of expression and how this has developed over the last 50 years or so. Although there has been no fundamental change in the approach of the English courts to this issue, the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union have led to an acceptance that decisions in cases involving conflicts between copyright and freedom of expression need to be grounded in the European human rights framework. Like the CJEU, the English courts have generally preferred to treat human rights considerations as influencing the interpretation and application of the internal mechanisms in copyright law rather than as supplying an external corrective mechanism. In that sense progress has been made towards the constitutionalisation of copyright law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Media Law
Journal of Media Law Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The only platform for focused, rigorous analysis of global developments in media law, this peer-reviewed journal, launched in Summer 2009, is: essential for teaching and research, essential for practice, essential for policy-making. It turns the spotlight on all those aspects of law which impinge on and shape modern media practices - from regulation and ownership, to libel law and constitutional aspects of broadcasting such as free speech and privacy, obscenity laws, copyright, piracy, and other aspects of IT law. The result is the first journal to take a serious view of law through the lens. The first issues feature articles on a wide range of topics such as: Developments in Defamation · Balancing Freedom of Expression and Privacy in the European Court of Human Rights · The Future of Public Television · Cameras in the Courtroom - Media Access to Classified Documents · Advertising Revenue v Editorial Independence · Gordon Ramsay: Obscenity Regulation Pioneer?
期刊最新文献
The Bypass Strategy: platforms, the Online Safety Act and future of online speech Freedom of expression after disinformation: Towards a new paradigm for the right to receive information The Digital Services Act’s red line: what the Commission can and cannot do about disinformation The regulation of disinformation: a critical appraisal The EU policy on disinformation: aims and legal basis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1