我们对海湾合作委员会的实际盈余管理了解多少?

IF 3.2 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI:10.1108/jaee-06-2023-0180
Mahmoud Alghemary, B. Al‐Najjar, N. Polovina
{"title":"我们对海湾合作委员会的实际盈余管理了解多少?","authors":"Mahmoud Alghemary, B. Al‐Najjar, N. Polovina","doi":"10.1108/jaee-06-2023-0180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe authors empirically investigate the association between acquisition, ownership structure and accrual earnings management (AEM) on real earnings management (REM) using Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)-listed firms' context.Design/methodology/approachThe authors' sample consists of 1,892 firm-year observations for the period from 2007–2017, and the authors adopt a panel data approach in investigating the interrelationships in this study. The authors employ different econometrics approach to test the authors' hypotheses.FindingsThe findings reveal that acquiring companies engage more in AEM if compared to REM. In terms of ownership structure, institutional ownership and state ownership mitigate the engagement in REM, whereas foreign ownership is found to be an ineffective mechanism in reducing engagement in REM. The authors report similar findings on ownership structure for AEM. The authors also find that the GCC firms engage more in REM when the firms engage in AEM, suggesting a complementary relation between these two earnings management techniques. These findings are robust after controlling for different aspects including any endogeneity issue in the authors' models.Originality/valueThe authors' research highlights the importance of understanding REM and AEM dynamics in GCC context. Also, the authors' findings on ownership structure suggest that GCC-listed firms can gain from institutional and state ownership which restricts earnings management, improving firm transparency and subsequently impacting firm performance.","PeriodicalId":45702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What do we know about real earnings management in the GCC?\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Alghemary, B. Al‐Najjar, N. Polovina\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jaee-06-2023-0180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe authors empirically investigate the association between acquisition, ownership structure and accrual earnings management (AEM) on real earnings management (REM) using Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)-listed firms' context.Design/methodology/approachThe authors' sample consists of 1,892 firm-year observations for the period from 2007–2017, and the authors adopt a panel data approach in investigating the interrelationships in this study. The authors employ different econometrics approach to test the authors' hypotheses.FindingsThe findings reveal that acquiring companies engage more in AEM if compared to REM. In terms of ownership structure, institutional ownership and state ownership mitigate the engagement in REM, whereas foreign ownership is found to be an ineffective mechanism in reducing engagement in REM. The authors report similar findings on ownership structure for AEM. The authors also find that the GCC firms engage more in REM when the firms engage in AEM, suggesting a complementary relation between these two earnings management techniques. These findings are robust after controlling for different aspects including any endogeneity issue in the authors' models.Originality/valueThe authors' research highlights the importance of understanding REM and AEM dynamics in GCC context. Also, the authors' findings on ownership structure suggest that GCC-listed firms can gain from institutional and state ownership which restricts earnings management, improving firm transparency and subsequently impacting firm performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-06-2023-0180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-06-2023-0180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的利用海湾合作委员会(GCC)上市公司的背景,实证研究了收购、股权结构和应计盈余管理(AEM)对实际盈余管理(REM)的影响。设计/方法/方法作者的样本包括2007-2017年期间的1892个公司年度观察结果,作者在调查本研究中的相互关系时采用了面板数据方法。作者采用不同的计量经济学方法来检验作者的假设。研究结果表明,与REM相比,收购公司更多地参与AEM。就所有权结构而言,机构所有权和国家所有权减轻了对REM的参与,而外国所有权被发现是减少对REM参与的无效机制。作者报告了关于AEM所有权结构的类似研究结果。作者还发现,当GCC公司参与AEM时,GCC公司更多地参与REM,这表明这两种盈余管理技术之间存在互补关系。在控制了不同方面(包括作者模型中的任何内生性问题)后,这些发现是稳健的。原创性/价值作者的研究强调了在GCC背景下理解REM和AEM动力学的重要性。此外,作者对股权结构的研究结果表明,海湾合作委员会上市公司可以从机构和国家所有权中获益,这限制了盈余管理,提高了公司透明度,进而影响了公司业绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What do we know about real earnings management in the GCC?
PurposeThe authors empirically investigate the association between acquisition, ownership structure and accrual earnings management (AEM) on real earnings management (REM) using Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)-listed firms' context.Design/methodology/approachThe authors' sample consists of 1,892 firm-year observations for the period from 2007–2017, and the authors adopt a panel data approach in investigating the interrelationships in this study. The authors employ different econometrics approach to test the authors' hypotheses.FindingsThe findings reveal that acquiring companies engage more in AEM if compared to REM. In terms of ownership structure, institutional ownership and state ownership mitigate the engagement in REM, whereas foreign ownership is found to be an ineffective mechanism in reducing engagement in REM. The authors report similar findings on ownership structure for AEM. The authors also find that the GCC firms engage more in REM when the firms engage in AEM, suggesting a complementary relation between these two earnings management techniques. These findings are robust after controlling for different aspects including any endogeneity issue in the authors' models.Originality/valueThe authors' research highlights the importance of understanding REM and AEM dynamics in GCC context. Also, the authors' findings on ownership structure suggest that GCC-listed firms can gain from institutional and state ownership which restricts earnings management, improving firm transparency and subsequently impacting firm performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Board monitoring and corporate disclosure: the role of the institutional environment and firm-level governance School ties between external auditors and audit committee: evidence from the audit fee in Indonesia Improving the prediction of firm performance using nonfinancial disclosures: a machine learning approach Intersubjectivity on organizational goal congruence and performance measurement process: evidence from an Indonesian firm The association between institutional monitoring, political connections and audit report lag: evidence from the Malaysian capital market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1