Fátima Brandão, Carla Costa, Maria João Bessa, Vanessa Valdiglesias, Bryan Hellack, Andrea Haase, Sónia Fraga, João Paulo Teixeira
{"title":"无定形二氧化硅纳米材料在大鼠肺泡上皮细胞中不同变体的多参数体外遗传毒性评估。","authors":"Fátima Brandão, Carla Costa, Maria João Bessa, Vanessa Valdiglesias, Bryan Hellack, Andrea Haase, Sónia Fraga, João Paulo Teixeira","doi":"10.1080/17435390.2023.2265481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The hazard posed to human health by inhaled amorphous silica nanomaterials (aSiO<sub>2</sub> NM) remains uncertain. Herein, we assessed the cyto- and genotoxicity of aSiO<sub>2</sub> NM variants covering different sizes (7, 15, and 40 nm) and surface modifications (unmodified, phosphonate-, amino- and trimethylsilyl-modified) on rat alveolar epithelial (RLE-6TN) cells. Cytotoxicity was evaluated at 24 h after exposure to the aSiO<sub>2</sub> NM variants by the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release and WST-1 reduction assays, while genotoxicity was assessed using different endpoints: DNA damage (single- and double-strand breaks [SSB and DSB]) by the comet assay for all aSiO<sub>2</sub> NM variants; cell cycle progression and γ-H2AX levels (DSB) by flow cytometry for those variants that presented higher cytotoxic and DNA damaging potential. The variants with higher surface area demonstrated a higher cytotoxic potential (SiO<sub>2</sub>_7, SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Unmod, SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Amino, and SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Phospho). SiO<sub>2</sub>_40 was the only variant that induced significant DNA damage on RLE-6TN cells. On the other hand, all tested variants (SiO<sub>2</sub>_7, SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Unmod, SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Amino, and SiO<sub>2</sub>_40) significantly increased total γ-H2AX levels. At high concentrations (28 µg/cm<sup>2</sup>), a decrease in G<sub>0</sub>/G<sub>1</sub> subpopulation was accompanied by a significant increase in S and G<sub>2</sub>/M sub-populations after exposure to all tested materials except for SiO<sub>2</sub>_40 which did not affect cell cycle progression. Based on the obtained data, the tested variants can be ranked for its genotoxic DNA damage potential as follows: SiO<sub>2</sub>_7 = SiO<sub>2</sub>_40 = SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Unmod > SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Amino. Our study supports the usefulness of multiparametric approaches to improve the understanding on NM mechanisms of action and hazard prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":18899,"journal":{"name":"Nanotoxicology","volume":" ","pages":"511-528"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiparametric <i>in vitro</i> genotoxicity assessment of different variants of amorphous silica nanomaterials in rat alveolar epithelial cells.\",\"authors\":\"Fátima Brandão, Carla Costa, Maria João Bessa, Vanessa Valdiglesias, Bryan Hellack, Andrea Haase, Sónia Fraga, João Paulo Teixeira\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17435390.2023.2265481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The hazard posed to human health by inhaled amorphous silica nanomaterials (aSiO<sub>2</sub> NM) remains uncertain. Herein, we assessed the cyto- and genotoxicity of aSiO<sub>2</sub> NM variants covering different sizes (7, 15, and 40 nm) and surface modifications (unmodified, phosphonate-, amino- and trimethylsilyl-modified) on rat alveolar epithelial (RLE-6TN) cells. Cytotoxicity was evaluated at 24 h after exposure to the aSiO<sub>2</sub> NM variants by the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release and WST-1 reduction assays, while genotoxicity was assessed using different endpoints: DNA damage (single- and double-strand breaks [SSB and DSB]) by the comet assay for all aSiO<sub>2</sub> NM variants; cell cycle progression and γ-H2AX levels (DSB) by flow cytometry for those variants that presented higher cytotoxic and DNA damaging potential. The variants with higher surface area demonstrated a higher cytotoxic potential (SiO<sub>2</sub>_7, SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Unmod, SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Amino, and SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Phospho). SiO<sub>2</sub>_40 was the only variant that induced significant DNA damage on RLE-6TN cells. On the other hand, all tested variants (SiO<sub>2</sub>_7, SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Unmod, SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Amino, and SiO<sub>2</sub>_40) significantly increased total γ-H2AX levels. At high concentrations (28 µg/cm<sup>2</sup>), a decrease in G<sub>0</sub>/G<sub>1</sub> subpopulation was accompanied by a significant increase in S and G<sub>2</sub>/M sub-populations after exposure to all tested materials except for SiO<sub>2</sub>_40 which did not affect cell cycle progression. Based on the obtained data, the tested variants can be ranked for its genotoxic DNA damage potential as follows: SiO<sub>2</sub>_7 = SiO<sub>2</sub>_40 = SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Unmod > SiO<sub>2</sub>_15_Amino. Our study supports the usefulness of multiparametric approaches to improve the understanding on NM mechanisms of action and hazard prediction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nanotoxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"511-528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nanotoxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2023.2265481\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2023.2265481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multiparametric in vitro genotoxicity assessment of different variants of amorphous silica nanomaterials in rat alveolar epithelial cells.
The hazard posed to human health by inhaled amorphous silica nanomaterials (aSiO2 NM) remains uncertain. Herein, we assessed the cyto- and genotoxicity of aSiO2 NM variants covering different sizes (7, 15, and 40 nm) and surface modifications (unmodified, phosphonate-, amino- and trimethylsilyl-modified) on rat alveolar epithelial (RLE-6TN) cells. Cytotoxicity was evaluated at 24 h after exposure to the aSiO2 NM variants by the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release and WST-1 reduction assays, while genotoxicity was assessed using different endpoints: DNA damage (single- and double-strand breaks [SSB and DSB]) by the comet assay for all aSiO2 NM variants; cell cycle progression and γ-H2AX levels (DSB) by flow cytometry for those variants that presented higher cytotoxic and DNA damaging potential. The variants with higher surface area demonstrated a higher cytotoxic potential (SiO2_7, SiO2_15_Unmod, SiO2_15_Amino, and SiO2_15_Phospho). SiO2_40 was the only variant that induced significant DNA damage on RLE-6TN cells. On the other hand, all tested variants (SiO2_7, SiO2_15_Unmod, SiO2_15_Amino, and SiO2_40) significantly increased total γ-H2AX levels. At high concentrations (28 µg/cm2), a decrease in G0/G1 subpopulation was accompanied by a significant increase in S and G2/M sub-populations after exposure to all tested materials except for SiO2_40 which did not affect cell cycle progression. Based on the obtained data, the tested variants can be ranked for its genotoxic DNA damage potential as follows: SiO2_7 = SiO2_40 = SiO2_15_Unmod > SiO2_15_Amino. Our study supports the usefulness of multiparametric approaches to improve the understanding on NM mechanisms of action and hazard prediction.
期刊介绍:
Nanotoxicology invites contributions addressing research relating to the potential for human and environmental exposure, hazard and risk associated with the use and development of nano-structured materials. In this context, the term nano-structured materials has a broad definition, including ‘materials with at least one dimension in the nanometer size range’. These nanomaterials range from nanoparticles and nanomedicines, to nano-surfaces of larger materials and composite materials. The range of nanomaterials in use and under development is extremely diverse, so this journal includes a range of materials generated for purposeful delivery into the body (food, medicines, diagnostics and prosthetics), to consumer products (e.g. paints, cosmetics, electronics and clothing), and particles designed for environmental applications (e.g. remediation). It is the nano-size range if these materials which unifies them and defines the scope of Nanotoxicology .
While the term ‘toxicology’ indicates risk, the journal Nanotoxicology also aims to encompass studies that enhance safety during the production, use and disposal of nanomaterials. Well-controlled studies demonstrating a lack of exposure, hazard or risk associated with nanomaterials, or studies aiming to improve biocompatibility are welcomed and encouraged, as such studies will lead to an advancement of nanotechnology. Furthermore, many nanoparticles are developed with the intention to improve human health (e.g. antimicrobial agents), and again, such articles are encouraged. In order to promote quality, Nanotoxicology will prioritise publications that have demonstrated characterisation of the nanomaterials investigated.