William Moritz, Amanda M Westman, Mary C Politi, Dod Working Group, Ida K Fox
{"title":"评估关于颈脊髓损伤上肢重建手术的在线患者决策辅助:试点测试知识、决策冲突和可接受性。","authors":"William Moritz, Amanda M Westman, Mary C Politi, Dod Working Group, Ida K Fox","doi":"10.1177/23814683231199721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> While nerve and tendon transfer surgery can restore upper extremity function and independence after midcervical spinal cord injury, few individuals (∼14%) undergo surgery. There is limited information regarding these complex and time-sensitive treatment options. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) convey complex health information and help individuals make informed, preference-consistent choices. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a newly created PtDA for people with spinal cord injury who are considering options to optimize upper extremity function. <b>Methods.</b> The PtDA was developed by our multidisciplinary group based on clinical evidence and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. A prospective pilot study enrolled adults with midcervical spinal cord injury to evaluate the PtDA. Participants completed surveys about knowledge and decisional conflict before and after viewing the PtDA. Acceptability measures and suggestions for further improvement were also solicited. <b>Results.</b> Forty-two individuals were enrolled and completed study procedures. Participants had a 20% increase in knowledge after using the PtDA (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The number of participants experiencing decisional conflict decreased after viewing the PtDA (33 v. 18, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Acceptability was high. To improve the PtDA, participants suggested adding details about specific surgeries and outcomes. <b>Limitations.</b> Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we used an entirely virtual study methodology and recruited participants from national networks and organizations. Most participants were older than the general population with a new spinal cord injury and may have different injury causes than typical surgical candidates. <b>Conclusions.</b> A de novo PtDA improved knowledge of treatment options and reduced decisional conflict about reconstructive surgery among people with cervical spinal cord injury. Future work should explore PtDA use for improving knowledge and decisional conflict in the nonresearch, clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>People with cervical spinal cord injury prioritize gaining upper extremity function after injury, but few individuals receive information about treatment options.A newly created patient decision aid (PtDA) provides information about recovery after spinal cord injury and the role of traditional tendon and newer nerve transfer surgery to improve upper extremity upper extremity function.The PtDA improved knowledge and decreased decisional conflict in this pilot study.Future work should focus on studying dissemination and implementation of the ptDA into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"8 2","pages":"23814683231199721"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/65/10.1177_23814683231199721.PMC10583528.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing an Online Patient Decision Aid about Upper Extremity Reconstructive Surgery for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Testing Knowledge, Decisional Conflict, and Acceptability.\",\"authors\":\"William Moritz, Amanda M Westman, Mary C Politi, Dod Working Group, Ida K Fox\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23814683231199721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background.</b> While nerve and tendon transfer surgery can restore upper extremity function and independence after midcervical spinal cord injury, few individuals (∼14%) undergo surgery. There is limited information regarding these complex and time-sensitive treatment options. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) convey complex health information and help individuals make informed, preference-consistent choices. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a newly created PtDA for people with spinal cord injury who are considering options to optimize upper extremity function. <b>Methods.</b> The PtDA was developed by our multidisciplinary group based on clinical evidence and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. A prospective pilot study enrolled adults with midcervical spinal cord injury to evaluate the PtDA. Participants completed surveys about knowledge and decisional conflict before and after viewing the PtDA. Acceptability measures and suggestions for further improvement were also solicited. <b>Results.</b> Forty-two individuals were enrolled and completed study procedures. Participants had a 20% increase in knowledge after using the PtDA (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The number of participants experiencing decisional conflict decreased after viewing the PtDA (33 v. 18, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Acceptability was high. To improve the PtDA, participants suggested adding details about specific surgeries and outcomes. <b>Limitations.</b> Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we used an entirely virtual study methodology and recruited participants from national networks and organizations. Most participants were older than the general population with a new spinal cord injury and may have different injury causes than typical surgical candidates. <b>Conclusions.</b> A de novo PtDA improved knowledge of treatment options and reduced decisional conflict about reconstructive surgery among people with cervical spinal cord injury. Future work should explore PtDA use for improving knowledge and decisional conflict in the nonresearch, clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>People with cervical spinal cord injury prioritize gaining upper extremity function after injury, but few individuals receive information about treatment options.A newly created patient decision aid (PtDA) provides information about recovery after spinal cord injury and the role of traditional tendon and newer nerve transfer surgery to improve upper extremity upper extremity function.The PtDA improved knowledge and decreased decisional conflict in this pilot study.Future work should focus on studying dissemination and implementation of the ptDA into clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MDM Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"23814683231199721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/65/10.1177_23814683231199721.PMC10583528.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MDM Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683231199721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683231199721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景虽然神经和肌腱转移手术可以在中颈脊髓损伤后恢复上肢功能和独立性,但很少有人(~14%)接受手术。关于这些复杂且时间敏感的治疗方案,信息有限。患者决策辅助工具(PtDA)传达复杂的健康信息,帮助个人做出知情、偏好一致的选择。本研究的目的是评估一种新创建的PtDA,用于正在考虑优化上肢功能的脊髓损伤患者。方法。PtDA是由我们的多学科小组根据临床证据和渥太华决策支持框架开发的。一项前瞻性先导性研究纳入了患有中颈脊髓损伤的成年人,以评估PtDA。参与者在观看PtDA前后完成了关于知识和决策冲突的调查。还征求了可接受的措施和进一步改进的建议。后果42名受试者被纳入研究并完成了研究程序。使用PtDA后,参与者的知识量增加了20%(P P = 0.001)。可接受性高。为了改进PtDA,参与者建议添加有关具体手术和结果的详细信息。局限性由于新冠肺炎大流行,我们使用了完全虚拟的研究方法,并从国家网络和组织招募了参与者。大多数参与者年龄比患有新脊髓损伤的普通人群大,并且可能与典型的手术候选者有不同的损伤原因。结论。新的PtDA提高了颈脊髓损伤患者对治疗方案的认识,减少了重建手术的决策冲突。未来的工作应该探索在非研究性临床环境中使用PtDA来改善知识和决策冲突。亮点:颈脊髓损伤患者优先考虑在损伤后获得上肢功能,但很少有人收到有关治疗选择的信息。一种新创建的患者决策辅助工具(PtDA)提供了有关脊髓损伤后恢复的信息,以及传统肌腱和新型神经移植手术在改善上肢上肢功能方面的作用。在这项试点研究中,PtDA提高了知识,减少了决策冲突。未来的工作应该集中在研究ptDA在临床实践中的传播和实施。
Assessing an Online Patient Decision Aid about Upper Extremity Reconstructive Surgery for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Testing Knowledge, Decisional Conflict, and Acceptability.
Background. While nerve and tendon transfer surgery can restore upper extremity function and independence after midcervical spinal cord injury, few individuals (∼14%) undergo surgery. There is limited information regarding these complex and time-sensitive treatment options. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) convey complex health information and help individuals make informed, preference-consistent choices. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a newly created PtDA for people with spinal cord injury who are considering options to optimize upper extremity function. Methods. The PtDA was developed by our multidisciplinary group based on clinical evidence and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. A prospective pilot study enrolled adults with midcervical spinal cord injury to evaluate the PtDA. Participants completed surveys about knowledge and decisional conflict before and after viewing the PtDA. Acceptability measures and suggestions for further improvement were also solicited. Results. Forty-two individuals were enrolled and completed study procedures. Participants had a 20% increase in knowledge after using the PtDA (P < 0.001). The number of participants experiencing decisional conflict decreased after viewing the PtDA (33 v. 18, P = 0.001). Acceptability was high. To improve the PtDA, participants suggested adding details about specific surgeries and outcomes. Limitations. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we used an entirely virtual study methodology and recruited participants from national networks and organizations. Most participants were older than the general population with a new spinal cord injury and may have different injury causes than typical surgical candidates. Conclusions. A de novo PtDA improved knowledge of treatment options and reduced decisional conflict about reconstructive surgery among people with cervical spinal cord injury. Future work should explore PtDA use for improving knowledge and decisional conflict in the nonresearch, clinical setting.
Highlights: People with cervical spinal cord injury prioritize gaining upper extremity function after injury, but few individuals receive information about treatment options.A newly created patient decision aid (PtDA) provides information about recovery after spinal cord injury and the role of traditional tendon and newer nerve transfer surgery to improve upper extremity upper extremity function.The PtDA improved knowledge and decreased decisional conflict in this pilot study.Future work should focus on studying dissemination and implementation of the ptDA into clinical practice.