[大连市老年社区人群无症状心房颤动筛查:一项单中心研究]。

Y H Yang, R Q Xu, R F Zhang, Y S Wei, L Hong, J Sun, T Cong, Y L Xia
{"title":"[大连市老年社区人群无症状心房颤动筛查:一项单中心研究]。","authors":"Y H Yang,&nbsp;R Q Xu,&nbsp;R F Zhang,&nbsp;Y S Wei,&nbsp;L Hong,&nbsp;J Sun,&nbsp;T Cong,&nbsp;Y L Xia","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20230819-00097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> We aimed to determine the epidemiological characteristics of asymptomatic AF in elder community population (≥65 years old) to analyze the detection rate of different screening methods. <b>Methods:</b> The study was a prospective cohort study. The elder (≥65 years old) residents who voluntarily participated in free physical examination in Dalian community were selected. The participants were randomly divided into screening group (including intensive screening group and single screening group) and control group. The control group received interrogation, medical history collection and routine 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) examination. Screening group received an additional single-lead ambulatory ECG equipment worn for 5-7 days. Intensive screening group received two equal-length wearings in 2020 and 2021 respectively, while one screening group only wore once in 2020. <b>Results:</b> Finally 3 340 residents ((70.7±5.0) years old) which consisted of 1 488 males (44.55%) were enrolled. There were 1 945 residents in screening group, including 859 in intensive screening group and 1 086 in one-time screening group. The control group included 1 395 people. Detection rate of asymptomatic AF was significantly higher in screening group than control group (79(4.06%) vs. 24(1.72%), <i>P<</i>0.001). Higher detection rate was found in screening group than control group in AF risk factors (1 or 2-3) subgroups and CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score (2-3 or≥4) subgroups (<i>P</i><0.05). Additionally, no difference was found between intensive screening group and single screening group (42(4.89%) vs. 37(3.41%), <i>P</i>=0.100). Intensive screening increased detection rate (7(6.93%) vs. 1(0.58%), <i>P</i>=0.009) only in residents those with low thrombosis risk (CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VaSc<2). <b>Conclusions:</b> Screening in elderly (≥65 years old) can significantly improve the detection rate of asymptomatic AF by wearing single lead dynamic ECG device. The rate increased significantly with the increase of risk factors associated with AF by single screening. In addition, repeat screening of the same method may only improve detection rates in the group with low risk thrombotic scores and non-combination of AF risk factors.Screening methods that are appropriate for different populations may require further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":38755,"journal":{"name":"中华心血管病杂志","volume":"51 10","pages":"1056-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Screening for asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in elder community populations in Dalian: a single center study].\",\"authors\":\"Y H Yang,&nbsp;R Q Xu,&nbsp;R F Zhang,&nbsp;Y S Wei,&nbsp;L Hong,&nbsp;J Sun,&nbsp;T Cong,&nbsp;Y L Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20230819-00097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> We aimed to determine the epidemiological characteristics of asymptomatic AF in elder community population (≥65 years old) to analyze the detection rate of different screening methods. <b>Methods:</b> The study was a prospective cohort study. The elder (≥65 years old) residents who voluntarily participated in free physical examination in Dalian community were selected. The participants were randomly divided into screening group (including intensive screening group and single screening group) and control group. The control group received interrogation, medical history collection and routine 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) examination. Screening group received an additional single-lead ambulatory ECG equipment worn for 5-7 days. Intensive screening group received two equal-length wearings in 2020 and 2021 respectively, while one screening group only wore once in 2020. <b>Results:</b> Finally 3 340 residents ((70.7±5.0) years old) which consisted of 1 488 males (44.55%) were enrolled. There were 1 945 residents in screening group, including 859 in intensive screening group and 1 086 in one-time screening group. The control group included 1 395 people. Detection rate of asymptomatic AF was significantly higher in screening group than control group (79(4.06%) vs. 24(1.72%), <i>P<</i>0.001). Higher detection rate was found in screening group than control group in AF risk factors (1 or 2-3) subgroups and CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score (2-3 or≥4) subgroups (<i>P</i><0.05). Additionally, no difference was found between intensive screening group and single screening group (42(4.89%) vs. 37(3.41%), <i>P</i>=0.100). Intensive screening increased detection rate (7(6.93%) vs. 1(0.58%), <i>P</i>=0.009) only in residents those with low thrombosis risk (CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VaSc<2). <b>Conclusions:</b> Screening in elderly (≥65 years old) can significantly improve the detection rate of asymptomatic AF by wearing single lead dynamic ECG device. The rate increased significantly with the increase of risk factors associated with AF by single screening. In addition, repeat screening of the same method may only improve detection rates in the group with low risk thrombotic scores and non-combination of AF risk factors.Screening methods that are appropriate for different populations may require further exploration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华心血管病杂志\",\"volume\":\"51 10\",\"pages\":\"1056-1062\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华心血管病杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20230819-00097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华心血管病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20230819-00097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解社区老年人群(≥65岁)无症状房颤的流行病学特征,分析不同筛查方法的检出率。方法:本研究为前瞻性队列研究。选取大连社区自愿参加免费体检的老年(≥65岁)居民。参与者被随机分为筛查组(包括强化筛查组和单次筛查组)和对照组。对照组接受询问、病史采集和常规12导联心电图检查。筛查组接受额外的单导联动态心电图设备,佩戴5-7天。强化筛查组分别在2020年和2021年接受了两次等长的穿着,而一个筛查组在2020年只穿了一次。结果:最终登记了3340名居民(70.7±5.0)岁,其中男性1488人(44.55%)。筛查组居民1 945人,其中强化筛查组859人,一次性筛查组1 086人。对照组包括1395人。筛查组无症状性房颤检出率显著高于对照组(79(4.06%)vs.24(1.72%),P0.001)。房颤危险因素(1或2-3)亚组和CHA2DS2-VASc评分(2-3或≥4)亚组筛查组检出率高于对照组,PP=0.100。强化筛查提高了检出率(7(6.93%)vs.1(0.58%),P=0.009)仅在血栓形成风险低的居民中(CHA2DS2-VaSC结论:在老年人(≥65岁)中佩戴单导联动态心电图设备可以显著提高无症状房颤的检出率。通过单次筛查,该比率随着与AF相关的危险因素的增加而显著增加。此外,同样方法的重复筛查可能只会提高低风险血栓形成评分和非AF风险因素组合组的检测率。适合不同人群的筛查方法可能需要进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Screening for asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in elder community populations in Dalian: a single center study].

Objective: We aimed to determine the epidemiological characteristics of asymptomatic AF in elder community population (≥65 years old) to analyze the detection rate of different screening methods. Methods: The study was a prospective cohort study. The elder (≥65 years old) residents who voluntarily participated in free physical examination in Dalian community were selected. The participants were randomly divided into screening group (including intensive screening group and single screening group) and control group. The control group received interrogation, medical history collection and routine 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) examination. Screening group received an additional single-lead ambulatory ECG equipment worn for 5-7 days. Intensive screening group received two equal-length wearings in 2020 and 2021 respectively, while one screening group only wore once in 2020. Results: Finally 3 340 residents ((70.7±5.0) years old) which consisted of 1 488 males (44.55%) were enrolled. There were 1 945 residents in screening group, including 859 in intensive screening group and 1 086 in one-time screening group. The control group included 1 395 people. Detection rate of asymptomatic AF was significantly higher in screening group than control group (79(4.06%) vs. 24(1.72%), P<0.001). Higher detection rate was found in screening group than control group in AF risk factors (1 or 2-3) subgroups and CHA2DS2-VASc score (2-3 or≥4) subgroups (P<0.05). Additionally, no difference was found between intensive screening group and single screening group (42(4.89%) vs. 37(3.41%), P=0.100). Intensive screening increased detection rate (7(6.93%) vs. 1(0.58%), P=0.009) only in residents those with low thrombosis risk (CHA2DS2-VaSc<2). Conclusions: Screening in elderly (≥65 years old) can significantly improve the detection rate of asymptomatic AF by wearing single lead dynamic ECG device. The rate increased significantly with the increase of risk factors associated with AF by single screening. In addition, repeat screening of the same method may only improve detection rates in the group with low risk thrombotic scores and non-combination of AF risk factors.Screening methods that are appropriate for different populations may require further exploration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华心血管病杂志
中华心血管病杂志 Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10577
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Cardiology , established in February 1973, is one of the major academic medical journals sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and a leading periodical in the field of cardiology in China. It specializes in cardiology and related disciplines with a readership of more than 25 000. The journal publishes editorials and guidelines as well as important original articles on clinical and experimental investigations, reflecting achievements made in China and promoting academic communication between domestic and foreign cardiologists. The journal includes the following columns: Editorials, Strategies, Comments, Clinical Investigations, Experimental Investigations, Epidemiology and Prevention, Lectures, Comprehensive Reviews, Continuing Medical Education, etc.
期刊最新文献
[Research progress on the interaction between valve endothelial cells and interstitial cells in calcific aortic valve disease]. [Study on the association between different obesity metabolic phenotypes and carotid plaque]. [Trends in the case-fatality rates for acute myocardial infarction in China from 2015 to 2019]. [A case of cardiac valvular dysplasia combined with dilated cardiomyopathy caused by a homozygous nonsense variant in PLD1]. [A case of Fabry disease with cardiac injury as the main clinical manifestation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1