扩大使用宫内节育器的综合评价。

Carmen V. Harrison, Cecilia Igwe-Kalu, Lauren Eide
{"title":"扩大使用宫内节育器的综合评价。","authors":"Carmen V. Harrison,&nbsp;Cecilia Igwe-Kalu,&nbsp;Lauren Eide","doi":"10.1016/j.nwh.2023.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the evidence on the impact of extended use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) use among women of reproductive age.</p></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><p><span>Electronic resource databases used were PubMed, </span>CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Peer-reviewed articles published during 2012 to 2022 were considered.</p></div><div><h3>Article Selection</h3><p>Ten articles met the criteria and included data for a total of 7,420 women.</p></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><p>Data were extracted from each study using the subheadings “Author/Date,” “Participants,” “Methods,” “Interventions,” and “Outcomes.” Additionally, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to guide data extraction.</p></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><p>Common themes were identified among each of the articles that supported the purpose of this integrative review<span>, such as adverse effects, perceived effectiveness, pregnancy prevention, and cost effectiveness of extended use of IUDs.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The available evidence supports the notion that extending IUD use beyond the original time frame approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is safe and effective with minimal side effects. However, there remains a paucity of evidence examining this topic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39985,"journal":{"name":"Nursing for Women''s Health","volume":"27 6","pages":"Pages 427-434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Integrative Review of Extended Use of Intrauterine Devices\",\"authors\":\"Carmen V. Harrison,&nbsp;Cecilia Igwe-Kalu,&nbsp;Lauren Eide\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nwh.2023.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the evidence on the impact of extended use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) use among women of reproductive age.</p></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><p><span>Electronic resource databases used were PubMed, </span>CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Peer-reviewed articles published during 2012 to 2022 were considered.</p></div><div><h3>Article Selection</h3><p>Ten articles met the criteria and included data for a total of 7,420 women.</p></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><p>Data were extracted from each study using the subheadings “Author/Date,” “Participants,” “Methods,” “Interventions,” and “Outcomes.” Additionally, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to guide data extraction.</p></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><p>Common themes were identified among each of the articles that supported the purpose of this integrative review<span>, such as adverse effects, perceived effectiveness, pregnancy prevention, and cost effectiveness of extended use of IUDs.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The available evidence supports the notion that extending IUD use beyond the original time frame approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is safe and effective with minimal side effects. However, there remains a paucity of evidence examining this topic.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing for Women''s Health\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 427-434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing for Women''s Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751485123002040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing for Women''s Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751485123002040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨育龄妇女长期使用宫内节育器(IUD)影响的证据。数据来源:使用的电子资源数据库有PubMed、CINAHL和Google Scholar。审议了2012年至2022年期间发表的同行评审文章。文章选择:10篇文章符合标准,共包含7420名女性的数据。数据提取:使用副标题“作者/日期”、“参与者”、“方法”、“干预措施”和“结果”从每项研究中提取数据。此外,系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南用于指导数据提取。数据综合:支持本综合综述目的的每一篇文章都确定了共同的主题,如不良反应、感知有效性、妊娠预防、,结论:现有证据支持将宫内节育器的使用时间延长到美国食品和药物管理局批准的原始时间范围之外是安全有效的,副作用最小。然而,研究这一主题的证据仍然很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Integrative Review of Extended Use of Intrauterine Devices

Objective

To explore the evidence on the impact of extended use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) use among women of reproductive age.

Data Sources

Electronic resource databases used were PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Peer-reviewed articles published during 2012 to 2022 were considered.

Article Selection

Ten articles met the criteria and included data for a total of 7,420 women.

Data Extraction

Data were extracted from each study using the subheadings “Author/Date,” “Participants,” “Methods,” “Interventions,” and “Outcomes.” Additionally, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to guide data extraction.

Data Synthesis

Common themes were identified among each of the articles that supported the purpose of this integrative review, such as adverse effects, perceived effectiveness, pregnancy prevention, and cost effectiveness of extended use of IUDs.

Conclusion

The available evidence supports the notion that extending IUD use beyond the original time frame approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is safe and effective with minimal side effects. However, there remains a paucity of evidence examining this topic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing for Women''s Health
Nursing for Women''s Health Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Nursing for Women"s Health publishes the most recent and compelling health care information on women"s health, newborn care and professional nursing issues. As a refereed, clinical practice journal, it provides professionals involved in providing optimum nursing care for women and their newborns with health care trends and everyday issues in a concise, practical, and easy-to-read format.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Screening Women for Intimate Partner Violence Among Health Care Providers in Thailand. A Guide to Successfully Publishing a Clinical Practice Manuscript. Evaluation of a Menstrual Hygiene Education Program for Adolescent Girls in Rural India. The Experiences of Pregnancy Among Adolescent Girls in Jordan. Implementation of Genetic Carrier Screening at Gynecologic-Related Visits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1