将智力和发育残疾培训纳入医学院课程:试点干预。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2023.2271224
Joanne Siegel, Kathleen McGrath, Elisa Muniz, Vincent Siasoco, Priya Chandan, Emily Noonan, Karen Bonuck
{"title":"将智力和发育残疾培训纳入医学院课程:试点干预。","authors":"Joanne Siegel,&nbsp;Kathleen McGrath,&nbsp;Elisa Muniz,&nbsp;Vincent Siasoco,&nbsp;Priya Chandan,&nbsp;Emily Noonan,&nbsp;Karen Bonuck","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2023.2271224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite the rising prevalence of developmental disabilities (DD) in the US, there remains insufficient training for healthcare professionals to care for this medically underserved population - particularly adults. The National Inclusive Curriculum for Health Education (NICHE) aims to improve attitudes and knowledge towards people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (PWIDD); herein we describe one such intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The intervention integrated didactic, panel presentation and clinical skills components into a 2<sup>nd</sup> year medical school curriculum.  The didactic session, covering  health and assessment of PWIDDs, history of IDD, stigma, etc., was co-taught by a developmental pediatrician, family medicine physician and social worker.  A panel of 3 adult self-advocates (SAs) with DD and a parent of a child with DD spoke about their lived experiences.  One week later, students practiced taking clinical histories of SAs within small group settings with adult PWIDDs, facilitated by medical school faculty. Students completed the NICHE Knowledge(49 items) and Attitudes (60 items) surveys. The evaluation analyzed pre/post intervention differences in a) knowledge and attitude scores overall and b) by student age, gender, intended medical specialty, and prior experiences with PWIDDs. Open-ended comments were analyzed with content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall Knowledge scores increased from pre-to posttest (<i>n</i> = 85; 65[19] vs. 73[17], <i>p</i> = 0.00), while Attitudes score improved (i.e., decreased) (<i>n</i> = 88; 0.55 [.06] vs. 0.53 [0.06]); <i>p</i> = 0.00).  Higher pretest knowledge was found among female identified students (vs. others; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and those knowing > = 5 PWIDD (vs < 5; <i>p</i> = 0.02).  Students characterize their IDD training and experience prior to intervention as 'lacking' and described the sessions as effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A brief (4 hours total) intervention was associated with modest but significant improved knowledge and attitudes towards PWIDDs. Replication and sustainability of this and other NICHE interventions are needed to fill gaps in PWIDDs' health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ba/00/ZMEO_28_2271224.PMC10591531.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infusing intellectual and Developmental disability training into Medical School curriculum: a Pilot intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Joanne Siegel,&nbsp;Kathleen McGrath,&nbsp;Elisa Muniz,&nbsp;Vincent Siasoco,&nbsp;Priya Chandan,&nbsp;Emily Noonan,&nbsp;Karen Bonuck\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10872981.2023.2271224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite the rising prevalence of developmental disabilities (DD) in the US, there remains insufficient training for healthcare professionals to care for this medically underserved population - particularly adults. The National Inclusive Curriculum for Health Education (NICHE) aims to improve attitudes and knowledge towards people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (PWIDD); herein we describe one such intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The intervention integrated didactic, panel presentation and clinical skills components into a 2<sup>nd</sup> year medical school curriculum.  The didactic session, covering  health and assessment of PWIDDs, history of IDD, stigma, etc., was co-taught by a developmental pediatrician, family medicine physician and social worker.  A panel of 3 adult self-advocates (SAs) with DD and a parent of a child with DD spoke about their lived experiences.  One week later, students practiced taking clinical histories of SAs within small group settings with adult PWIDDs, facilitated by medical school faculty. Students completed the NICHE Knowledge(49 items) and Attitudes (60 items) surveys. The evaluation analyzed pre/post intervention differences in a) knowledge and attitude scores overall and b) by student age, gender, intended medical specialty, and prior experiences with PWIDDs. Open-ended comments were analyzed with content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall Knowledge scores increased from pre-to posttest (<i>n</i> = 85; 65[19] vs. 73[17], <i>p</i> = 0.00), while Attitudes score improved (i.e., decreased) (<i>n</i> = 88; 0.55 [.06] vs. 0.53 [0.06]); <i>p</i> = 0.00).  Higher pretest knowledge was found among female identified students (vs. others; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and those knowing > = 5 PWIDD (vs < 5; <i>p</i> = 0.02).  Students characterize their IDD training and experience prior to intervention as 'lacking' and described the sessions as effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A brief (4 hours total) intervention was associated with modest but significant improved knowledge and attitudes towards PWIDDs. Replication and sustainability of this and other NICHE interventions are needed to fill gaps in PWIDDs' health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ba/00/ZMEO_28_2271224.PMC10591531.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2271224\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2271224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管美国发育障碍(DD)的发病率不断上升,但医疗保健专业人员仍没有得到足够的培训来照顾这一医疗服务不足的人群,尤其是成年人。国家健康教育包容性课程旨在改善对智力和发育残疾者的态度和知识;在此我们描述一种这样的干预。方法:干预措施将教学、小组演示和临床技能组成部分纳入医学院二年级课程。教育课程包括PWIDD的健康和评估、IDD病史、污名等,由一名发育儿科医生、家庭医学医生和社会工作者共同教授。一个由3名患有DD的成人自我倡导者(SA)和一名患有DD儿童的父母组成的小组讲述了他们的生活经历。一周后,学生们在医学院教员的帮助下,在成人PWIDD的小组环境中练习记录SA的临床病史。学生完成了NICHE知识(49项)和态度(60项)调查。评估分析了干预前/干预后a)总体知识和态度得分的差异,以及b)按学生年龄、性别、预期医学专业和既往PWIDD经历的差异。对开放式评论进行了内容分析。结果:总体知识得分从测试前到测试后均有所提高(n = 85;65[19]对73[17],p = 0.00),而态度得分提高(即下降)(n = 88;0.55[0.06]对0.53[0.06]);p = 0.00)。在女性学生中发现更高的预测知识(与其他学生相比;p = 0.01)和那些知道> = 5 PWIDD(vs p = 0.02)。学生们将他们在干预前的IDD培训和经验描述为“缺乏”,并将这些课程描述为有效的。结论:简介(4 总时数)干预与对PWIDD的知识和态度的适度但显著的改善有关。这一干预措施和其他新生儿重症监护室干预措施需要复制和可持续性,以填补PWIDD医疗保健方面的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Infusing intellectual and Developmental disability training into Medical School curriculum: a Pilot intervention.

Purpose: Despite the rising prevalence of developmental disabilities (DD) in the US, there remains insufficient training for healthcare professionals to care for this medically underserved population - particularly adults. The National Inclusive Curriculum for Health Education (NICHE) aims to improve attitudes and knowledge towards people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (PWIDD); herein we describe one such intervention.

Method: The intervention integrated didactic, panel presentation and clinical skills components into a 2nd year medical school curriculum.  The didactic session, covering  health and assessment of PWIDDs, history of IDD, stigma, etc., was co-taught by a developmental pediatrician, family medicine physician and social worker.  A panel of 3 adult self-advocates (SAs) with DD and a parent of a child with DD spoke about their lived experiences.  One week later, students practiced taking clinical histories of SAs within small group settings with adult PWIDDs, facilitated by medical school faculty. Students completed the NICHE Knowledge(49 items) and Attitudes (60 items) surveys. The evaluation analyzed pre/post intervention differences in a) knowledge and attitude scores overall and b) by student age, gender, intended medical specialty, and prior experiences with PWIDDs. Open-ended comments were analyzed with content analysis.

Results: Overall Knowledge scores increased from pre-to posttest (n = 85; 65[19] vs. 73[17], p = 0.00), while Attitudes score improved (i.e., decreased) (n = 88; 0.55 [.06] vs. 0.53 [0.06]); p = 0.00).  Higher pretest knowledge was found among female identified students (vs. others; p = 0.01) and those knowing > = 5 PWIDD (vs < 5; p = 0.02).  Students characterize their IDD training and experience prior to intervention as 'lacking' and described the sessions as effective.

Conclusions: A brief (4 hours total) intervention was associated with modest but significant improved knowledge and attitudes towards PWIDDs. Replication and sustainability of this and other NICHE interventions are needed to fill gaps in PWIDDs' health care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
期刊最新文献
Medical law; promotion of medicine curriculum: a letter to editor. Tips for developing a coaching program in medical education. High- and low-achieving international medical students' perceptions of the factors influencing their academic performance at Chinese universities. A Medical Education Research Library: key research topics and associated experts. Financial barriers and inequity in medical education in India: challenges to training a diverse and representative healthcare workforce.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1