使用全系统方法克服癌症筛查的障碍,并进一步关注未筛查人群。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Medical Screening Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1177/09691413231208160
Michael R Gieske, Jessica Kerns, Gary M Schmitt, Goetz Kloecker, Irfan A Budhani, Joseph Nolan, Valerie A Williams, Deema Alkapalan, Katelyn Ferguson, Ryan Yadav, Royce F Calhoun
{"title":"使用全系统方法克服癌症筛查的障碍,并进一步关注未筛查人群。","authors":"Michael R Gieske, Jessica Kerns, Gary M Schmitt, Goetz Kloecker, Irfan A Budhani, Joseph Nolan, Valerie A Williams, Deema Alkapalan, Katelyn Ferguson, Ryan Yadav, Royce F Calhoun","doi":"10.1177/09691413231208160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lung cancer screening program at St Elizabeth Healthcare (Kentucky, USA) began in 2013. Over 33,000 low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screens have been performed. From 2015 through 2021, 2595 lung cancers were diagnosed systemwide. A Screening Program with Impactful Results from Early Detection, reviews that experience; 342 (13.2%) were diagnosed by screening and 2253 (86.8%) were non-screened. As a secondary objective, the non-screened cohort was queried to determine how many additional individuals could have been screened, identifying barriers and failures to meet eligibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our QlikSense database extracted the lung cancer patients from the Cancer Patient Data and Management System, and identified and categorized them separately as screened or non-screened populations. Stage distribution was compared in screened and non-screened groups. Those meeting age criteria, with any smoking history, were further queried for screening eligibility, accessing the electronic medical record smoking history and audit trail, and determining if enough information was available to substantiate screening eligibility. The same methodology was applied to CMS 2015 and USPSTF 2021 criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The screened and non-screened patients were accounted for in a stage migration chart demonstrating clear shift to early stage among screened lung cancer patients. Additionally, analysis of non-screened individuals is presented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Of the St Elizabeth Healthcare eligible patients attributed to primary care providers, 49.6% were screened in 2021. Despite this level of success, this study highlighted a sizeable pool of additional individuals that could have been screened. We are shifting focus to the non-screened pool of patients that meet eligibility, further enhancing the impact on our community.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming barriers to lung cancer screening using a systemwide approach with additional focus on the non-screened.\",\"authors\":\"Michael R Gieske, Jessica Kerns, Gary M Schmitt, Goetz Kloecker, Irfan A Budhani, Joseph Nolan, Valerie A Williams, Deema Alkapalan, Katelyn Ferguson, Ryan Yadav, Royce F Calhoun\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09691413231208160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lung cancer screening program at St Elizabeth Healthcare (Kentucky, USA) began in 2013. Over 33,000 low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screens have been performed. From 2015 through 2021, 2595 lung cancers were diagnosed systemwide. A Screening Program with Impactful Results from Early Detection, reviews that experience; 342 (13.2%) were diagnosed by screening and 2253 (86.8%) were non-screened. As a secondary objective, the non-screened cohort was queried to determine how many additional individuals could have been screened, identifying barriers and failures to meet eligibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our QlikSense database extracted the lung cancer patients from the Cancer Patient Data and Management System, and identified and categorized them separately as screened or non-screened populations. Stage distribution was compared in screened and non-screened groups. Those meeting age criteria, with any smoking history, were further queried for screening eligibility, accessing the electronic medical record smoking history and audit trail, and determining if enough information was available to substantiate screening eligibility. The same methodology was applied to CMS 2015 and USPSTF 2021 criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The screened and non-screened patients were accounted for in a stage migration chart demonstrating clear shift to early stage among screened lung cancer patients. Additionally, analysis of non-screened individuals is presented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Of the St Elizabeth Healthcare eligible patients attributed to primary care providers, 49.6% were screened in 2021. Despite this level of success, this study highlighted a sizeable pool of additional individuals that could have been screened. We are shifting focus to the non-screened pool of patients that meet eligibility, further enhancing the impact on our community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"99-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413231208160\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413231208160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国肯塔基州圣伊丽莎白医疗中心的肺癌癌症筛查项目始于2013年。已经进行了33000多次低剂量计算机断层扫描癌症筛查。从2015年到2021年,全系统共诊断出2595例肺癌。早期检测结果有影响的筛查计划,回顾经验;342例(13.2%)经筛查确诊,2253例(86.8%)未经筛查。作为第二个目标,对未筛查的队列进行了询问,以确定还有多少人可以接受筛查,从而确定满足资格的障碍和失败。方法:我们的QlikSense数据库从癌症患者数据和管理系统中提取癌症患者,并将他们分别鉴定为筛查人群或非筛查人群。比较筛选组和非筛选组的阶段分布。进一步询问那些符合年龄标准、有吸烟史的人是否符合筛查资格,访问电子病历、吸烟史和审计记录,并确定是否有足够的信息证实筛查资格。同样的方法也适用于CMS 2015和USPSTF 2021标准。结果:筛查和未筛查的患者在阶段迁移图中进行了说明,表明筛查的癌症患者明显转移到早期。此外,还对未经筛查的个体进行了分析。结论:在圣伊丽莎白医疗保健中心符合初级保健提供者条件的患者中,49.6%在2021年接受了筛查。尽管取得了这样的成功,但这项研究强调了本可以筛查的大量额外个体。我们正在将重点转移到符合资格的未经筛查的患者群体上,进一步增强了对我们社区的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Overcoming barriers to lung cancer screening using a systemwide approach with additional focus on the non-screened.

Background: The lung cancer screening program at St Elizabeth Healthcare (Kentucky, USA) began in 2013. Over 33,000 low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screens have been performed. From 2015 through 2021, 2595 lung cancers were diagnosed systemwide. A Screening Program with Impactful Results from Early Detection, reviews that experience; 342 (13.2%) were diagnosed by screening and 2253 (86.8%) were non-screened. As a secondary objective, the non-screened cohort was queried to determine how many additional individuals could have been screened, identifying barriers and failures to meet eligibility.

Methods: Our QlikSense database extracted the lung cancer patients from the Cancer Patient Data and Management System, and identified and categorized them separately as screened or non-screened populations. Stage distribution was compared in screened and non-screened groups. Those meeting age criteria, with any smoking history, were further queried for screening eligibility, accessing the electronic medical record smoking history and audit trail, and determining if enough information was available to substantiate screening eligibility. The same methodology was applied to CMS 2015 and USPSTF 2021 criteria.

Results: The screened and non-screened patients were accounted for in a stage migration chart demonstrating clear shift to early stage among screened lung cancer patients. Additionally, analysis of non-screened individuals is presented.

Conclusion: Of the St Elizabeth Healthcare eligible patients attributed to primary care providers, 49.6% were screened in 2021. Despite this level of success, this study highlighted a sizeable pool of additional individuals that could have been screened. We are shifting focus to the non-screened pool of patients that meet eligibility, further enhancing the impact on our community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
期刊最新文献
Age-specific differences in tumour characteristics between screen-detected and non-screen-detected breast cancers in women aged 40-74 at diagnosis in Sweden from 2008 to 2017. Association between time to colonoscopy after positive fecal testing and colorectal cancer outcomes in Alberta, Canada. Cancer screening programs in Japan: Progress and challenges. Strong association between reduction of late-stage cancers and reduction of cancer-specific mortality in meta-regression of randomized screening trials across multiple cancer types. Factors associated with private or public breast cancer screening attendance in Queensland, Australia: A retrospective cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1