体外冲击波治疗插入性和非插入性跟腱病的疗效。

Hong Li , Wei Yao , Xiao'ao Xue , Yunxia Li , Yinghui Hua
{"title":"体外冲击波治疗插入性和非插入性跟腱病的疗效。","authors":"Hong Li ,&nbsp;Wei Yao ,&nbsp;Xiao'ao Xue ,&nbsp;Yunxia Li ,&nbsp;Yinghui Hua","doi":"10.1016/j.asmart.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The treatment for Achilles tendinopathy varies widely, and there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for both non-insertional and insertional Achilles tendinopathy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of insertional and non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy (AT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sixty patients with AT were invited to participate in this study. Patients were allocated to one of two groups according to the site of the AT, including an insertional AT (IAT) group and a non-insertional AT (NIAT) group. ESWT was performed once a week for five weeks for both groups. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles questionnaire (VISA-A) score and the visual analog scale (VAS) were used five times to evaluate the clinical outcomes, including before treatment, immediately after treatment, as well as one month, three months, and five years after treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At three months after treatment, the IAT group exhibited a significantly higher VISA-A score (82 ± 6 <em>vs.</em> 76 ± 11; <em>p</em> = 0.01) and a significantly lower VAS score (1 ± 1 <em>vs.</em> 2 ± 1; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) when compared with the NIAT group. At the five-year assessment, the IAT group (1 ± 1) had a significantly lower VAS score than the NIAT group (2 ± 1) (<em>p</em> = 0.02), while no significant difference for the VISA-A score was observed between the groups (84 ± 8 <em>vs.</em> 84 ± 10; <em>p</em> = 0.98).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Extracorporeal shock wave treatment can improve the symptoms of both insertional and non-insertional AT. The IAT patients experienced better clinical outcomes compared with the NIAT patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44283,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cc/5c/main.PMC10582256.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic effects following extracorporeal shock wave therapy for insertional and non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy\",\"authors\":\"Hong Li ,&nbsp;Wei Yao ,&nbsp;Xiao'ao Xue ,&nbsp;Yunxia Li ,&nbsp;Yinghui Hua\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asmart.2023.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The treatment for Achilles tendinopathy varies widely, and there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for both non-insertional and insertional Achilles tendinopathy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of insertional and non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy (AT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sixty patients with AT were invited to participate in this study. Patients were allocated to one of two groups according to the site of the AT, including an insertional AT (IAT) group and a non-insertional AT (NIAT) group. ESWT was performed once a week for five weeks for both groups. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles questionnaire (VISA-A) score and the visual analog scale (VAS) were used five times to evaluate the clinical outcomes, including before treatment, immediately after treatment, as well as one month, three months, and five years after treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At three months after treatment, the IAT group exhibited a significantly higher VISA-A score (82 ± 6 <em>vs.</em> 76 ± 11; <em>p</em> = 0.01) and a significantly lower VAS score (1 ± 1 <em>vs.</em> 2 ± 1; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) when compared with the NIAT group. At the five-year assessment, the IAT group (1 ± 1) had a significantly lower VAS score than the NIAT group (2 ± 1) (<em>p</em> = 0.02), while no significant difference for the VISA-A score was observed between the groups (84 ± 8 <em>vs.</em> 84 ± 10; <em>p</em> = 0.98).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Extracorporeal shock wave treatment can improve the symptoms of both insertional and non-insertional AT. The IAT patients experienced better clinical outcomes compared with the NIAT patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cc/5c/main.PMC10582256.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687323000171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687323000171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:跟腱病的治疗方法差异很大,对于非插入性和插入性跟腱病的最佳治疗方法没有达成共识。本研究旨在评价体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)治疗插入性和非插入性跟腱病(AT)的临床疗效。根据AT的部位,患者被分为两组中的一组,包括插入性AT(IAT)组和非插入式AT(NIAT)组。两组患者每周进行一次ESWT,共5周。维多利亚运动评估研究所阿喀琉斯问卷(VISA-A)评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)用于评估临床结果五次,包括治疗前、治疗后以及治疗后一个月、三个月和五年。结果:在治疗后三个月,IAT组表现出显著较高的VISA-a评分(82±6 vs.76±11;p=0.01)和显著较低的VAS评分(1±1 vs.2±1;p=0.02),而VISA-A评分在两组之间没有显著差异(84±8 vs.84±10;p=0.098)。结论:体外冲击波治疗可以改善插入性和非插入性AT的症状。与NIAT患者相比,IAT患者的临床结果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapeutic effects following extracorporeal shock wave therapy for insertional and non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy

Background

The treatment for Achilles tendinopathy varies widely, and there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for both non-insertional and insertional Achilles tendinopathy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of insertional and non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy (AT).

Methods

Sixty patients with AT were invited to participate in this study. Patients were allocated to one of two groups according to the site of the AT, including an insertional AT (IAT) group and a non-insertional AT (NIAT) group. ESWT was performed once a week for five weeks for both groups. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles questionnaire (VISA-A) score and the visual analog scale (VAS) were used five times to evaluate the clinical outcomes, including before treatment, immediately after treatment, as well as one month, three months, and five years after treatment.

Results

At three months after treatment, the IAT group exhibited a significantly higher VISA-A score (82 ± 6 vs. 76 ± 11; p = 0.01) and a significantly lower VAS score (1 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1; p < 0.001) when compared with the NIAT group. At the five-year assessment, the IAT group (1 ± 1) had a significantly lower VAS score than the NIAT group (2 ± 1) (p = 0.02), while no significant difference for the VISA-A score was observed between the groups (84 ± 8 vs. 84 ± 10; p = 0.98).

Conclusions

Extracorporeal shock wave treatment can improve the symptoms of both insertional and non-insertional AT. The IAT patients experienced better clinical outcomes compared with the NIAT patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology (AP-SMART) is the official peer-reviewed, open access journal of the Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society (APKASS) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Society of Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine (JOSKAS). It is published quarterly, in January, April, July and October, by Elsevier. The mission of AP-SMART is to inspire clinicians, practitioners, scientists and engineers to work towards a common goal to improve quality of life in the international community. The Journal publishes original research, reviews, editorials, perspectives, and letters to the Editor. Multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines will be the trend in the coming decades. AP-SMART provides a platform for the exchange of new clinical and scientific information in the most precise and expeditious way to achieve timely dissemination of information and cross-fertilization of ideas.
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting the therapeutic effects of multiple intra-articular injections of platelet-rich-plasma for knee osteoarthritis Early intervention of extracorporeal shockwave therapy sustained positive long-term effect on rotator cuff healing: A randomized controlled trial with 3-year follow-up The residual laxity of medial collateral ligament after magic point pie crusting MCL released in arthroscopic management of medial meniscus Fast rehabilitation does not worsen clinical, radiological, and arthroscopic outcomes after medial meniscus posterior root repair: A retrospective comparative study ACL injury characteristics in badminton : A registry study with prospectively collected data on sports related epidemiology and injury mechanism of 539 badminton players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1