两种常用实验室酵母菌株W303和BY4742的蛋白质组学比较分析。

IF 4 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Proteomes Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.3390/proteomes11040030
Valentina Rossio, Xinyue Liu, Joao A Paulo
{"title":"两种常用实验室酵母菌株W303和BY4742的蛋白质组学比较分析。","authors":"Valentina Rossio, Xinyue Liu, Joao A Paulo","doi":"10.3390/proteomes11040030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The yeast <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> is a powerful model system that is often used to expand our understanding of cellular processes and biological functions. Although many genetically well-characterized laboratory strains of <i>S. cerevisiae</i> are available, they may have different genetic backgrounds which can confound data interpretation. Here, we report a comparative whole-proteome analysis of two common laboratory yeast background strains, W303 and BY4742, in both exponential and stationary growth phases using isobaric-tag-based mass spectrometry to highlight differences in proteome complexity. We quantified over 4400 proteins, hundreds of which showed differences in abundance between strains and/or growth phases. Moreover, we used proteome-wide protein abundance to profile the mating type of the strains used in the experiment, the auxotrophic markers, and associated metabolic pathways, as well as to investigate differences in particular classes of proteins, such as the pleiotropic drug resistance (PDR) proteins. This study is a valuable resource that offers insight into mechanistic differences between two common yeast background strains and can be used as a guide to select a background that is best suited for addressing a particular biological question.</p>","PeriodicalId":20877,"journal":{"name":"Proteomes","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Two Commonly Used Laboratory Yeast Strains: W303 and BY4742.\",\"authors\":\"Valentina Rossio, Xinyue Liu, Joao A Paulo\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/proteomes11040030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The yeast <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> is a powerful model system that is often used to expand our understanding of cellular processes and biological functions. Although many genetically well-characterized laboratory strains of <i>S. cerevisiae</i> are available, they may have different genetic backgrounds which can confound data interpretation. Here, we report a comparative whole-proteome analysis of two common laboratory yeast background strains, W303 and BY4742, in both exponential and stationary growth phases using isobaric-tag-based mass spectrometry to highlight differences in proteome complexity. We quantified over 4400 proteins, hundreds of which showed differences in abundance between strains and/or growth phases. Moreover, we used proteome-wide protein abundance to profile the mating type of the strains used in the experiment, the auxotrophic markers, and associated metabolic pathways, as well as to investigate differences in particular classes of proteins, such as the pleiotropic drug resistance (PDR) proteins. This study is a valuable resource that offers insight into mechanistic differences between two common yeast background strains and can be used as a guide to select a background that is best suited for addressing a particular biological question.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proteomes\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594481/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proteomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes11040030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes11040030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

酿酒酵母是一个强大的模型系统,经常用于扩展我们对细胞过程和生物功能的理解。尽管有许多基因特征良好的酿酒酵母实验室菌株,但它们可能具有不同的遗传背景,这可能会混淆数据解释。在这里,我们报道了两种常见的实验室酵母背景菌株W303和BY4742在指数和固定生长阶段的比较全蛋白质组分析,使用基于同量标签的质谱法来突出蛋白质组复杂性的差异。我们量化了4400多种蛋白质,其中数百种蛋白质在菌株和/或生长阶段之间的丰度存在差异。此外,我们使用全蛋白质组的蛋白质丰度来描述实验中使用的菌株的交配类型、营养缺陷型标记和相关代谢途径,并研究特定类别蛋白质的差异,如多效性耐药性(PDR)蛋白质。这项研究是一项宝贵的资源,可以深入了解两种常见酵母背景菌株之间的机制差异,并可作为选择最适合解决特定生物学问题的背景的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Two Commonly Used Laboratory Yeast Strains: W303 and BY4742.

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a powerful model system that is often used to expand our understanding of cellular processes and biological functions. Although many genetically well-characterized laboratory strains of S. cerevisiae are available, they may have different genetic backgrounds which can confound data interpretation. Here, we report a comparative whole-proteome analysis of two common laboratory yeast background strains, W303 and BY4742, in both exponential and stationary growth phases using isobaric-tag-based mass spectrometry to highlight differences in proteome complexity. We quantified over 4400 proteins, hundreds of which showed differences in abundance between strains and/or growth phases. Moreover, we used proteome-wide protein abundance to profile the mating type of the strains used in the experiment, the auxotrophic markers, and associated metabolic pathways, as well as to investigate differences in particular classes of proteins, such as the pleiotropic drug resistance (PDR) proteins. This study is a valuable resource that offers insight into mechanistic differences between two common yeast background strains and can be used as a guide to select a background that is best suited for addressing a particular biological question.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proteomes
Proteomes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Proteomes (ISSN 2227-7382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of proteome science. Proteomes covers the multi-disciplinary topics of structural and functional biology, protein chemistry, cell biology, methodology used for protein analysis, including mass spectrometry, protein arrays, bioinformatics, HTS assays, etc. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers. Scope: -whole proteome analysis of any organism -disease/pharmaceutical studies -comparative proteomics -protein-ligand/protein interactions -structure/functional proteomics -gene expression -methodology -bioinformatics -applications of proteomics
期刊最新文献
The Non-Linear Profile of Aging: U-Shaped Expression of Myostatin, Follistatin and Intermediate Signals in a Longitudinal In Vitro Murine Cell Sarcopenia Model. Assessment of Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry (DIA-MS) for the Identification of Single Amino Acid Variants. Transcriptomics Revealed Differentially Expressed Transcription Factors and MicroRNAs in Human Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Comparative Proteome-Wide Abundance Profiling of Yeast Strains Deleted for Cdc48 Adaptors. Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometric Immunoassay Analysis of Parathyroid Hormone Fragments with Vitamin D Deficiency in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1