高调交叉足对2例Syme截肢患者步态生物力学的影响。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Prosthetics and Orthotics International Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000295
Conrad Slater, Brian J Hafner, Sara J Morgan
{"title":"高调交叉足对2例Syme截肢患者步态生物力学的影响。","authors":"Conrad Slater, Brian J Hafner, Sara J Morgan","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prosthetic treatment options for people with ankle disarticulation (i.e., Syme amputation) are limited. Prosthetic feet designed for people with Syme amputation are often low profile to accommodate build-height restrictions, resulting in decreased energy return during gait. High-profile crossover feet that attach to the posterior proximal aspect of the prosthetic socket can bypass these restrictions and may promote a more physiologic gait pattern.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare level-ground gait biomechanics and patient-reported outcomes between crossover and traditional energy-storing feet in people with Syme amputation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Within-participant pilot study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both participants were fit with energy-storing and crossover feet and were randomized to the order they used the feet. Participants used each foot for 2 weeks before assessment. Step length symmetry, prosthetic ankle range of motion, prosthetic-side energy return, and peak sound-side loading were determined from motion capture data obtained in a laboratory. Mobility and balance confidence were measured using standardized patient-reported outcome measures. Foot preference was assessed with an ad hoc survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two participants with Syme amputations completed the study. Prosthetic ankle peak dorsiflexion and push-off power increased with the crossover foot compared with the energy-storing foot for both participants. Both participants reported an overall preference of the crossover foot. Changes in patient-reported outcomes did not exceed published minimum detectable change values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Crossover feet increased prosthetic ankle range of motion and energy return compared with traditional energy-storing feet in this pilot investigation of 2 participants. Crossover feet seem to promote physiologic gait and may be a promising alternative to traditional low-profile feet for people with Syme amputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":"510-518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of high-profile crossover feet on gait biomechanics in 2 individuals with Syme amputation.\",\"authors\":\"Conrad Slater, Brian J Hafner, Sara J Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prosthetic treatment options for people with ankle disarticulation (i.e., Syme amputation) are limited. Prosthetic feet designed for people with Syme amputation are often low profile to accommodate build-height restrictions, resulting in decreased energy return during gait. High-profile crossover feet that attach to the posterior proximal aspect of the prosthetic socket can bypass these restrictions and may promote a more physiologic gait pattern.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare level-ground gait biomechanics and patient-reported outcomes between crossover and traditional energy-storing feet in people with Syme amputation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Within-participant pilot study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both participants were fit with energy-storing and crossover feet and were randomized to the order they used the feet. Participants used each foot for 2 weeks before assessment. Step length symmetry, prosthetic ankle range of motion, prosthetic-side energy return, and peak sound-side loading were determined from motion capture data obtained in a laboratory. Mobility and balance confidence were measured using standardized patient-reported outcome measures. Foot preference was assessed with an ad hoc survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two participants with Syme amputations completed the study. Prosthetic ankle peak dorsiflexion and push-off power increased with the crossover foot compared with the energy-storing foot for both participants. Both participants reported an overall preference of the crossover foot. Changes in patient-reported outcomes did not exceed published minimum detectable change values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Crossover feet increased prosthetic ankle range of motion and energy return compared with traditional energy-storing feet in this pilot investigation of 2 participants. Crossover feet seem to promote physiologic gait and may be a promising alternative to traditional low-profile feet for people with Syme amputation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"510-518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthetics and Orthotics International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000295\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:踝关节脱位(即Syme截肢)患者的假肢治疗选择有限。为Syme截肢患者设计的假肢脚通常很低调,以适应身高限制,从而减少步态中的能量返回。连接到假肢插座的后近端的高调交叉脚可以绕过这些限制,并可以促进更生理的步态模式。目的:比较Syme截肢患者交叉足和传统储能足的水平地面步态生物力学和患者报告的结果。研究设计:在参与者试点研究中。方法:两名参与者都适合储能和交叉双脚,并按照他们使用双脚的顺序随机分组。参与者在评估前每只脚使用2周。从实验室获得的运动捕捉数据中确定步长对称性、假肢踝关节的运动范围、假肢侧能量返回和峰值声音侧负荷。使用标准化患者报告的结果测量来测量移动性和平衡置信度。通过一项特别调查对足部偏好进行了评估。结果:两名Syme截肢患者完成了研究。与能量储存足相比,交叉足增加了两名参与者的假肢踝关节峰值背屈和蹬出力。两位参与者都报告了他们对交叉足的总体偏好。患者报告结果的变化未超过公布的最小可检测变化值。结论:在对2名参与者进行的初步调查中,与传统的储能脚相比,交叉足增加了假肢踝关节的运动范围和能量返回。交叉足似乎可以促进生理步态,对于Syme截肢患者来说,它可能是传统的低姿态足的一种很有前途的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of high-profile crossover feet on gait biomechanics in 2 individuals with Syme amputation.

Background: Prosthetic treatment options for people with ankle disarticulation (i.e., Syme amputation) are limited. Prosthetic feet designed for people with Syme amputation are often low profile to accommodate build-height restrictions, resulting in decreased energy return during gait. High-profile crossover feet that attach to the posterior proximal aspect of the prosthetic socket can bypass these restrictions and may promote a more physiologic gait pattern.

Objectives: To compare level-ground gait biomechanics and patient-reported outcomes between crossover and traditional energy-storing feet in people with Syme amputation.

Study design: Within-participant pilot study.

Methods: Both participants were fit with energy-storing and crossover feet and were randomized to the order they used the feet. Participants used each foot for 2 weeks before assessment. Step length symmetry, prosthetic ankle range of motion, prosthetic-side energy return, and peak sound-side loading were determined from motion capture data obtained in a laboratory. Mobility and balance confidence were measured using standardized patient-reported outcome measures. Foot preference was assessed with an ad hoc survey.

Results: Two participants with Syme amputations completed the study. Prosthetic ankle peak dorsiflexion and push-off power increased with the crossover foot compared with the energy-storing foot for both participants. Both participants reported an overall preference of the crossover foot. Changes in patient-reported outcomes did not exceed published minimum detectable change values.

Conclusion: Crossover feet increased prosthetic ankle range of motion and energy return compared with traditional energy-storing feet in this pilot investigation of 2 participants. Crossover feet seem to promote physiologic gait and may be a promising alternative to traditional low-profile feet for people with Syme amputation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
期刊最新文献
Returning to work after dysvascular lower limb amputation-A novel multivariate approach to examine relative contributions of biopsychosocial predictors. Biomechanical effects of foot orthoses on jump landing performance: A systematic review. Which factors may influence medium-term quality of life of patients with lower-limb loss? A systematic review of the literature. What are relevant predictors of physical activity in older adults with lower limb loss (LLL)? Results of a retrospective analysis. A scoping review on upper extremity prostheses: Satisfaction, barriers, and their implications in resource-limited countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1