前交叉韧带重建后股四头肌扭矩发育率的变化及其与单腿跳跃距离的关系。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1177/19417381231205295
Beyza Tayfur, Alexa Keneen Johnson, Riann Palmieri-Smith
{"title":"前交叉韧带重建后股四头肌扭矩发育率的变化及其与单腿跳跃距离的关系。","authors":"Beyza Tayfur, Alexa Keneen Johnson, Riann Palmieri-Smith","doi":"10.1177/19417381231205295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quadriceps neuromuscular function is negatively affected after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The specific effect that the ACLR has on the quadriceps femoris rate of force production and its impact on functional recovery is unknown.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) limb would present persistent deficits in the rate of torque development (RTD), when compared with the non-ACL limb before ACLR until 9 months (9M) post-ACLR.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight participants performed quadriceps maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) before (PRE), at 5 months (5M) and at 9M after ACLR. Single-leg hop distance was also assessed at 9M. Quadriceps RTD was calculated at 50, 100, and 200 ms after the onset of torque production. Maximum RTD was also calculated. A 2 (limb) × 3 (time) repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for RTD<sub>50</sub>, RTD<sub>100</sub>, RTD<sub>200</sub>, and RTD<sub>max</sub>. Linear regressions were used to evaluate the associations of MVIC and RTD values at 5M and 9M with single-leg hop distance at 9M.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ACL limb had lower RTD values at all times compared with the non-ACL limb (<i>P</i> < 0.05). RTD of the ACL limb significantly decreased from PRE to 5M, and then recovered to PRE levels at 9M (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The non-ACL limb displayed no differences from baseline to either 5M or 9M. MVIC and RTD<sub>200</sub> at 5M predicted (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.313 and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.262, respectively) single-leg hop distance at 9M, better than the strength and RTD at 9M (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.235 and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.128, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quadriceps RTD is negatively affected after ACLR, and deficits may persist at the time of return to activity. Strength and RTD during recovery at 5M may predict more than 25% of the variance in single-leg hop distance at 9M, independently; hence, both provide important information to monitor functional recovery post-ACLR.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>RTD should be measured to understand the changes in neuromuscular capacity after ACLR, and rehabilitation strategies that target quick force production, ie, quick muscle activation and functional tasks, should be implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Quadriceps Rate of Torque Development After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Association to Single-Leg Hop Distance.\",\"authors\":\"Beyza Tayfur, Alexa Keneen Johnson, Riann Palmieri-Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19417381231205295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quadriceps neuromuscular function is negatively affected after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The specific effect that the ACLR has on the quadriceps femoris rate of force production and its impact on functional recovery is unknown.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) limb would present persistent deficits in the rate of torque development (RTD), when compared with the non-ACL limb before ACLR until 9 months (9M) post-ACLR.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight participants performed quadriceps maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) before (PRE), at 5 months (5M) and at 9M after ACLR. Single-leg hop distance was also assessed at 9M. Quadriceps RTD was calculated at 50, 100, and 200 ms after the onset of torque production. Maximum RTD was also calculated. A 2 (limb) × 3 (time) repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for RTD<sub>50</sub>, RTD<sub>100</sub>, RTD<sub>200</sub>, and RTD<sub>max</sub>. Linear regressions were used to evaluate the associations of MVIC and RTD values at 5M and 9M with single-leg hop distance at 9M.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ACL limb had lower RTD values at all times compared with the non-ACL limb (<i>P</i> < 0.05). RTD of the ACL limb significantly decreased from PRE to 5M, and then recovered to PRE levels at 9M (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The non-ACL limb displayed no differences from baseline to either 5M or 9M. MVIC and RTD<sub>200</sub> at 5M predicted (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.313 and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.262, respectively) single-leg hop distance at 9M, better than the strength and RTD at 9M (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.235 and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.128, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quadriceps RTD is negatively affected after ACLR, and deficits may persist at the time of return to activity. Strength and RTD during recovery at 5M may predict more than 25% of the variance in single-leg hop distance at 9M, independently; hence, both provide important information to monitor functional recovery post-ACLR.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>RTD should be measured to understand the changes in neuromuscular capacity after ACLR, and rehabilitation strategies that target quick force production, ie, quick muscle activation and functional tasks, should be implemented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346242/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231205295\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231205295","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前交叉韧带重建术后,股四头肌的神经肌肉功能受到负面影响。ACLR对股四头肌力量产生率的具体影响及其对功能恢复的影响尚不清楚。假设:前交叉韧带(ACL)肢体与非ACL肢体相比,在ACLR前至ACLR后9个月(9M),其扭矩发展率(RTD)将持续存在缺陷。研究设计:前瞻性队列研究。证据水平:3级。方法:28名参与者在PRE前、5个月(5M)和ACLR后9M进行股四头肌最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)。单腿跳跃距离也评估为9米。在扭矩产生开始后的50、100和200毫秒计算股四头肌RTD。还计算了最大RTD。RTD50、RTD100、RTD200和RTDmax采用2(肢体)×3(时间)重复测量方差分析。结果:ACL肢体在所有时间点的RTD值均低于非ACL肢体(P<0.05)。ACL肢体的RTD值从PRE显著下降到5M,然后在9M时恢复到PRE水平(P<0.05)。非ACL肢体从基线到5M或9M均无差异。MVIC和RTD200在5M时预测(R2=0.313和R2=0.262)在9M时的单腿跳跃距离,优于强度和RTD在9M(R2=0.235和R2=0.128)。5M恢复期间的强度和RTD可以独立地预测9M单腿跳跃距离变化的25%以上;因此,两者都为监测ACLR后的功能恢复提供了重要信息。临床相关性:应测量RTD以了解ACLR后神经肌肉能力的变化,并应实施针对快速力量产生的康复策略,即快速肌肉激活和功能任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changes in Quadriceps Rate of Torque Development After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Association to Single-Leg Hop Distance.

Background: Quadriceps neuromuscular function is negatively affected after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The specific effect that the ACLR has on the quadriceps femoris rate of force production and its impact on functional recovery is unknown.

Hypothesis: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) limb would present persistent deficits in the rate of torque development (RTD), when compared with the non-ACL limb before ACLR until 9 months (9M) post-ACLR.

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Methods: Twenty-eight participants performed quadriceps maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) before (PRE), at 5 months (5M) and at 9M after ACLR. Single-leg hop distance was also assessed at 9M. Quadriceps RTD was calculated at 50, 100, and 200 ms after the onset of torque production. Maximum RTD was also calculated. A 2 (limb) × 3 (time) repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for RTD50, RTD100, RTD200, and RTDmax. Linear regressions were used to evaluate the associations of MVIC and RTD values at 5M and 9M with single-leg hop distance at 9M.

Results: The ACL limb had lower RTD values at all times compared with the non-ACL limb (P < 0.05). RTD of the ACL limb significantly decreased from PRE to 5M, and then recovered to PRE levels at 9M (P < 0.05). The non-ACL limb displayed no differences from baseline to either 5M or 9M. MVIC and RTD200 at 5M predicted (R2 = 0.313 and R2 = 0.262, respectively) single-leg hop distance at 9M, better than the strength and RTD at 9M (R2 = 0.235 and R2 = 0.128, respectively).

Conclusion: Quadriceps RTD is negatively affected after ACLR, and deficits may persist at the time of return to activity. Strength and RTD during recovery at 5M may predict more than 25% of the variance in single-leg hop distance at 9M, independently; hence, both provide important information to monitor functional recovery post-ACLR.

Clinical relevance: RTD should be measured to understand the changes in neuromuscular capacity after ACLR, and rehabilitation strategies that target quick force production, ie, quick muscle activation and functional tasks, should be implemented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Injury Prevention Program Using a Global Systems Approach on High-Risk Movement Mechanics for Noncontact ACL Injury. Medium- to Long-term Outcomes of Fasciotomy for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome: A 6-Year Mean Follow-up Study. A Risk Tool for Evaluating Overuse Injury and Return-to-Play Time Periods in Youth and Collegiate Athletes: Preliminary Study. Effect of the Stretch-Shortening Cycle on the Relationship Between Maximum Number of Repetitions and Lifting Velocity During the Prone Bench Pull. Mechanisms and Trends in Women's Lacrosse Head and Musculoskeletal Injuries: A 15-Year Review of National Injury Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1