母亲对婴儿表现的变化是否与观察到的母婴互动质量的变化有关?

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Infant Behavior & Development Pub Date : 2023-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101896
Kjersti Sandnes, Silja B. Kårstad, Stian Lydersen, Turid Suzanne Berg-Nielsen
{"title":"母亲对婴儿表现的变化是否与观察到的母婴互动质量的变化有关?","authors":"Kjersti Sandnes,&nbsp;Silja B. Kårstad,&nbsp;Stian Lydersen,&nbsp;Turid Suzanne Berg-Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Infant mental health clinicians aiming to improve mother–infant dyads at risk typically target mothers’ representations of their infant or mother–infant interactions, assuming that one port of entry leads to change in the other. However, little is known about the relation between changes in mothers’ representations and in mother–infant interactions. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate this in a low- to moderate-risk community sample of 152 mothers (<em>M</em> = 29.7 years) of infants aged 0–2 years (<em>M</em> = 11.5 months) recruited from rural and urban cities in Norway. The mothers’ representations were measured using the Working Model of the Child Interview, and the quality of the mother–infant interactions was measured with the Emotional Availability Scales. We found no evidence of a relation between mothers’ changed representations and changed quality of mother–infant interactions. Several explanations concerning the low-risk status of the sample, the observation situation, the time between assessment points, and the homogeneous scores from the instruments used are discussed, as are the implications for clinical practice and future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48222,"journal":{"name":"Infant Behavior & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are changes in mothers’ representations of their infants related to changes in observed mother–infant interaction quality?\",\"authors\":\"Kjersti Sandnes,&nbsp;Silja B. Kårstad,&nbsp;Stian Lydersen,&nbsp;Turid Suzanne Berg-Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Infant mental health clinicians aiming to improve mother–infant dyads at risk typically target mothers’ representations of their infant or mother–infant interactions, assuming that one port of entry leads to change in the other. However, little is known about the relation between changes in mothers’ representations and in mother–infant interactions. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate this in a low- to moderate-risk community sample of 152 mothers (<em>M</em> = 29.7 years) of infants aged 0–2 years (<em>M</em> = 11.5 months) recruited from rural and urban cities in Norway. The mothers’ representations were measured using the Working Model of the Child Interview, and the quality of the mother–infant interactions was measured with the Emotional Availability Scales. We found no evidence of a relation between mothers’ changed representations and changed quality of mother–infant interactions. Several explanations concerning the low-risk status of the sample, the observation situation, the time between assessment points, and the homogeneous scores from the instruments used are discussed, as are the implications for clinical practice and future research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638323000887\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Behavior & Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638323000887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

旨在改善处于风险中的母婴二人组的婴儿心理健康临床医生通常针对母亲对其婴儿或母婴互动的表现,假设一个入口导致另一个入口的变化。然而,人们对母亲表征的变化与母婴互动之间的关系知之甚少。因此,目前的研究旨在对来自挪威农村和城市的152名0-2岁(M=11.5个月)婴儿的母亲(M=29.7岁)的中低风险社区样本进行调查。使用儿童访谈工作模型测量母亲的表征,并使用情绪可用性量表测量母婴互动的质量。我们没有发现任何证据表明母亲的表征变化与母婴互动质量变化之间存在关系。讨论了关于样本的低风险状态、观察情况、评估点之间的时间以及所用仪器的同质评分的几种解释,以及对临床实践和未来研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are changes in mothers’ representations of their infants related to changes in observed mother–infant interaction quality?

Infant mental health clinicians aiming to improve mother–infant dyads at risk typically target mothers’ representations of their infant or mother–infant interactions, assuming that one port of entry leads to change in the other. However, little is known about the relation between changes in mothers’ representations and in mother–infant interactions. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate this in a low- to moderate-risk community sample of 152 mothers (M = 29.7 years) of infants aged 0–2 years (M = 11.5 months) recruited from rural and urban cities in Norway. The mothers’ representations were measured using the Working Model of the Child Interview, and the quality of the mother–infant interactions was measured with the Emotional Availability Scales. We found no evidence of a relation between mothers’ changed representations and changed quality of mother–infant interactions. Several explanations concerning the low-risk status of the sample, the observation situation, the time between assessment points, and the homogeneous scores from the instruments used are discussed, as are the implications for clinical practice and future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infant Behavior & Development
Infant Behavior & Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Infant Behavior & Development publishes empirical (fundamental and clinical), theoretical, methodological and review papers. Brief reports dealing with behavioral development during infancy (up to 3 years) will also be considered. Papers of an inter- and multidisciplinary nature, for example neuroscience, non-linear dynamics and modelling approaches, are particularly encouraged. Areas covered by the journal include cognitive development, emotional development, perception, perception-action coupling, motor development and socialisation.
期刊最新文献
Predicting language outcomes at 3 years using individual differences in morphological segmentation in infancy Toddlers' sensitivity to segmental and suprasegmental mispronunciations of familiar words Exploring the role of home play and learning activities in socioemotional development at 36-months: Findings from a large birth cohort study Generalizability and representation in studies of infant perceptual narrowing: Considerations for future research Infant and parent heart rates during a babywearing procedure: Evidence for autonomic coregulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1