Sentinel-3 SLSTR有源火灾(AF)探测和FRP日间产品-算法描述和与MODIS、VIIRS和landsat AF数据的全球比较

IF 5.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of Remote Sensing Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.srs.2023.100087
Weidong Xu , Martin J. Wooster
{"title":"Sentinel-3 SLSTR有源火灾(AF)探测和FRP日间产品-算法描述和与MODIS、VIIRS和landsat AF数据的全球比较","authors":"Weidong Xu ,&nbsp;Martin J. Wooster","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2023.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer (SLSTR) senses the Earth from onboard two concurrently operating European Copernicus Sentinel-3 (S3) satellites. As the Terra platform carrying the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) is reaching its end of life, the S3 Active Fire Detection and FRP products generated from data captured by S3 SLSTR are expected to soon become the main global active fire (AF) product for the mid-morning and evening low Earth orbit timeslots. The S3 night-time AF product issued by the European Space Agency (ESA) has been operational since March 2020, and here we report on the significant adjustments made to enable the generation of a complimentary daytime product. Similar to MODIS, SLSTR possesses two middle infrared channels, both a ‘standard’ (normal gain; S7) channel and a ‘fire’ (low-gain; F1) channel - but in contrast to MODIS by day even the ambient background land surface is often saturated in the SLSTR standard gain MIR (S7) channel. This saturation necessitates far greater use of the F1 channel data by day for active fire detection than by night, even though F1 has characteristics which make its data more challenging to combine with that from the other SLSTR thermal infrared channels. Here we report on the approaches used to combine S7 and F1 data for optimized daytime AF detection, and also detail the other algorithm adjustments found necessary to include in the daytime AF product algorithm. We compare the resulting daytime SLSTR AF product data to that generated from near-simultaneous views provided by MODIS onboard Terra. When both sensors detect the same active fire cluster at similar time, there is minimal bias shown between the two FRP retrievals (the ordinary least squares linear best fit between matched SLSTR and MODIS per-fire FRP matchups has a slope of 0.97). At the regional scale, the S3 product detects 70% of the AF pixels that the matching MODIS product reports, but also provides a further (16%) set of unique AF pixel detections. Regional FRP totals derived from SLSTR appear slightly lower than those from MODIS, and the OLS linear best fit between these regional FRP matchup datasets has a slope of 0.91. This is largely due to SLSTR performing less well in detecting the lowest FRP fires by day, whereas by night the S3 product performs a little better than MODIS due to the increased night-time use of S7 in the earlier AF pixel detection stages. Global fire mapping at a 0.25° grid cell resolution shows very similar daytime fire patterns and FRP totals from S3 and Terra MODIS, with SLSTR detecting around twice the number of AF pixels due to the algorithm being more effective at identifying low FRP pixels at the edges of fire clusters. Regional time series case studies also show very similar temporal patterns between S3 and Terra MODIS. Longer-term intercomparisons such as these will provide the knowledge necessary to use MODIS and SLSTR AF products together to analyse long-term AF trends. Comparing near simultaneous observations of fires by SLSTR and from the 30 m spatial resolution Landsat Operational Land Image (OLI) data, we find that once there are around 150 OLI active fire pixels detected within the area of an SLSTR pixel, the chances of that SLSTR pixel being classed as an active fire by the daytime algorithm rises to almost 100%. The daytime SLSTR AF Detection and FRP product based on the algorithm described herein has been fully operational since March 2022 and is available from the Sentinel-3 Science Hub (<span>https://scihub.copernicus.eu/</span><svg><path></path></svg>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100087"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentinel-3 SLSTR active fire (AF) detection and FRP daytime product - Algorithm description and global intercomparison to MODIS, VIIRS and landsat AF data\",\"authors\":\"Weidong Xu ,&nbsp;Martin J. Wooster\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.srs.2023.100087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer (SLSTR) senses the Earth from onboard two concurrently operating European Copernicus Sentinel-3 (S3) satellites. As the Terra platform carrying the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) is reaching its end of life, the S3 Active Fire Detection and FRP products generated from data captured by S3 SLSTR are expected to soon become the main global active fire (AF) product for the mid-morning and evening low Earth orbit timeslots. The S3 night-time AF product issued by the European Space Agency (ESA) has been operational since March 2020, and here we report on the significant adjustments made to enable the generation of a complimentary daytime product. Similar to MODIS, SLSTR possesses two middle infrared channels, both a ‘standard’ (normal gain; S7) channel and a ‘fire’ (low-gain; F1) channel - but in contrast to MODIS by day even the ambient background land surface is often saturated in the SLSTR standard gain MIR (S7) channel. This saturation necessitates far greater use of the F1 channel data by day for active fire detection than by night, even though F1 has characteristics which make its data more challenging to combine with that from the other SLSTR thermal infrared channels. Here we report on the approaches used to combine S7 and F1 data for optimized daytime AF detection, and also detail the other algorithm adjustments found necessary to include in the daytime AF product algorithm. We compare the resulting daytime SLSTR AF product data to that generated from near-simultaneous views provided by MODIS onboard Terra. When both sensors detect the same active fire cluster at similar time, there is minimal bias shown between the two FRP retrievals (the ordinary least squares linear best fit between matched SLSTR and MODIS per-fire FRP matchups has a slope of 0.97). At the regional scale, the S3 product detects 70% of the AF pixels that the matching MODIS product reports, but also provides a further (16%) set of unique AF pixel detections. Regional FRP totals derived from SLSTR appear slightly lower than those from MODIS, and the OLS linear best fit between these regional FRP matchup datasets has a slope of 0.91. This is largely due to SLSTR performing less well in detecting the lowest FRP fires by day, whereas by night the S3 product performs a little better than MODIS due to the increased night-time use of S7 in the earlier AF pixel detection stages. Global fire mapping at a 0.25° grid cell resolution shows very similar daytime fire patterns and FRP totals from S3 and Terra MODIS, with SLSTR detecting around twice the number of AF pixels due to the algorithm being more effective at identifying low FRP pixels at the edges of fire clusters. Regional time series case studies also show very similar temporal patterns between S3 and Terra MODIS. Longer-term intercomparisons such as these will provide the knowledge necessary to use MODIS and SLSTR AF products together to analyse long-term AF trends. Comparing near simultaneous observations of fires by SLSTR and from the 30 m spatial resolution Landsat Operational Land Image (OLI) data, we find that once there are around 150 OLI active fire pixels detected within the area of an SLSTR pixel, the chances of that SLSTR pixel being classed as an active fire by the daytime algorithm rises to almost 100%. The daytime SLSTR AF Detection and FRP product based on the algorithm described herein has been fully operational since March 2022 and is available from the Sentinel-3 Science Hub (<span>https://scihub.copernicus.eu/</span><svg><path></path></svg>).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017223000123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017223000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

海洋和陆地表面温度辐射计(SLSTR)从两颗同时运行的欧洲哥白尼哨兵-3(S3)卫星上感应地球。随着携带中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)的Terra平台即将报废,根据S3 SLSTR捕获的数据生成的S3主动火灾探测和FRP产品预计很快将成为上午和晚上近地轨道时隙的主要全球主动火灾(AF)产品。欧洲航天局(ESA)发布的S3夜间AF产品自2020年3月开始运行,我们在此报告为生成免费日间产品所做的重大调整。与MODIS类似,SLSTR拥有两个中红外通道,一个是“标准”(正常增益;S7)通道,另一个是一个“火”(低增益;F1)通道,但与白天的MODIS相比,即使是环境背景地表在SLSTR标准增益MIR(S7)通道中也经常饱和。这种饱和需要白天比晚上更多地使用F1通道数据进行主动火灾探测,尽管F1具有使其数据与其他SLSTR热红外通道的数据相结合更具挑战性的特性。在这里,我们报告了用于组合S7和F1数据以优化日间AF检测的方法,并详细介绍了日间AF产品算法中所需的其他算法调整。我们将产生的日间SLSTR AF产品数据与Terra机载MODIS提供的近同时视图生成的数据进行了比较。当两个传感器在相似的时间检测到同一个活跃的火灾集群时,两个FRP检索之间显示出最小的偏差(匹配的SLSTR和MODIS每次火灾FRP匹配之间的普通最小二乘线性最佳拟合斜率为0.97)。在区域尺度上,S3产品检测到匹配的MODIS产品报告的70%的AF像素,而且还提供了另一组(16%)独特的AF像素检测。SLSTR得出的区域FRP总量似乎略低于MODIS,这些区域FRP匹配数据集之间的OLS线性最佳拟合斜率为0.91。这在很大程度上是由于SLSTR在白天检测最低FRP火灾方面表现不佳,而在夜间,由于在早期AF像素检测阶段增加了S7的夜间使用,S3产品的表现略好于MODIS。0.25°网格单元分辨率的全球火灾地图显示,S3和Terra MODIS的白天火灾模式和FRP总量非常相似,SLSTR检测到的AF像素数量大约是AF像素数量的两倍,因为该算法在识别火灾集群边缘的低FRP像素方面更有效。区域时间序列案例研究也显示S3和Terra MODIS之间的时间模式非常相似。这样的长期相互比较将提供必要的知识,将MODIS和SLSTR AF产品一起用于分析长期AF趋势。比较SLSTR和30米空间分辨率陆地卫星操作陆地图像(OLI)数据对火灾的近同时观测,我们发现,一旦在SLSTR像素的区域内检测到大约150个OLI活动火灾像素,该SLSTR像素被日间算法归类为活动火灾的几率几乎上升到100%。基于本文所述算法的日间SLSTR AF检测和FRP产品自2022年3月起全面投入使用,可从Sentinel-3科学中心获得(https://scihub.copernicus.eu/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sentinel-3 SLSTR active fire (AF) detection and FRP daytime product - Algorithm description and global intercomparison to MODIS, VIIRS and landsat AF data

The Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer (SLSTR) senses the Earth from onboard two concurrently operating European Copernicus Sentinel-3 (S3) satellites. As the Terra platform carrying the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) is reaching its end of life, the S3 Active Fire Detection and FRP products generated from data captured by S3 SLSTR are expected to soon become the main global active fire (AF) product for the mid-morning and evening low Earth orbit timeslots. The S3 night-time AF product issued by the European Space Agency (ESA) has been operational since March 2020, and here we report on the significant adjustments made to enable the generation of a complimentary daytime product. Similar to MODIS, SLSTR possesses two middle infrared channels, both a ‘standard’ (normal gain; S7) channel and a ‘fire’ (low-gain; F1) channel - but in contrast to MODIS by day even the ambient background land surface is often saturated in the SLSTR standard gain MIR (S7) channel. This saturation necessitates far greater use of the F1 channel data by day for active fire detection than by night, even though F1 has characteristics which make its data more challenging to combine with that from the other SLSTR thermal infrared channels. Here we report on the approaches used to combine S7 and F1 data for optimized daytime AF detection, and also detail the other algorithm adjustments found necessary to include in the daytime AF product algorithm. We compare the resulting daytime SLSTR AF product data to that generated from near-simultaneous views provided by MODIS onboard Terra. When both sensors detect the same active fire cluster at similar time, there is minimal bias shown between the two FRP retrievals (the ordinary least squares linear best fit between matched SLSTR and MODIS per-fire FRP matchups has a slope of 0.97). At the regional scale, the S3 product detects 70% of the AF pixels that the matching MODIS product reports, but also provides a further (16%) set of unique AF pixel detections. Regional FRP totals derived from SLSTR appear slightly lower than those from MODIS, and the OLS linear best fit between these regional FRP matchup datasets has a slope of 0.91. This is largely due to SLSTR performing less well in detecting the lowest FRP fires by day, whereas by night the S3 product performs a little better than MODIS due to the increased night-time use of S7 in the earlier AF pixel detection stages. Global fire mapping at a 0.25° grid cell resolution shows very similar daytime fire patterns and FRP totals from S3 and Terra MODIS, with SLSTR detecting around twice the number of AF pixels due to the algorithm being more effective at identifying low FRP pixels at the edges of fire clusters. Regional time series case studies also show very similar temporal patterns between S3 and Terra MODIS. Longer-term intercomparisons such as these will provide the knowledge necessary to use MODIS and SLSTR AF products together to analyse long-term AF trends. Comparing near simultaneous observations of fires by SLSTR and from the 30 m spatial resolution Landsat Operational Land Image (OLI) data, we find that once there are around 150 OLI active fire pixels detected within the area of an SLSTR pixel, the chances of that SLSTR pixel being classed as an active fire by the daytime algorithm rises to almost 100%. The daytime SLSTR AF Detection and FRP product based on the algorithm described herein has been fully operational since March 2022 and is available from the Sentinel-3 Science Hub (https://scihub.copernicus.eu/).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coastal vertical land motion across Southeast Asia derived from combining tide gauge and satellite altimetry observations Identifying thermokarst lakes using deep learning and high-resolution satellite images A two-stage deep learning architecture for detection global coastal and offshore submesoscale ocean eddy using SDGSAT-1 multispectral imagery A comprehensive evaluation of satellite-based and reanalysis soil moisture products over the upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia A comprehensive review of rice mapping from satellite data: Algorithms, product characteristics and consistency assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1