社会背景下的算法公平

Yunyou Huang , Wenjing Liu , Wanling Gao , Xiangjiang Lu , Xiaoshuang Liang , Zhengxin Yang , Hongxiao Li , Li Ma , Suqin Tang
{"title":"社会背景下的算法公平","authors":"Yunyou Huang ,&nbsp;Wenjing Liu ,&nbsp;Wanling Gao ,&nbsp;Xiangjiang Lu ,&nbsp;Xiaoshuang Liang ,&nbsp;Zhengxin Yang ,&nbsp;Hongxiao Li ,&nbsp;Li Ma ,&nbsp;Suqin Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Algorithmic fairness research is currently receiving significant attention, aiming to ensure that algorithms do not discriminate between different groups or individuals with similar characteristics. However, with the popularization of algorithms in all aspects of society, algorithms have changed from mere instruments to social infrastructure. For instance, facial recognition algorithms are widely used to provide user verification services and have become an indispensable part of many social infrastructures like transportation, health care, etc. As an instrument, an algorithm needs to pay attention to the fairness of its behavior. However, as a social infrastructure, it needs to pay even more attention to its impact on social fairness. Otherwise, it may exacerbate existing inequities or create new ones. For example, if an algorithm treats all passengers equally and eliminates special seats for pregnant women in the interest of fairness, it will increase the risk of pregnant women taking public transport and indirectly damage their right to fair travel. Therefore, algorithms have the responsibility to ensure social fairness, not just within their operations. It is now time to expand the concept of algorithmic fairness beyond mere behavioral equity, assessing algorithms in a broader societal context, and examining whether they uphold and promote social fairness. This article analyzes the current status and challenges of algorithmic fairness from three key perspectives: fairness definition, fairness dataset, and fairness algorithm. Furthermore, the potential directions and strategies to promote the fairness of the algorithm are proposed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100155,"journal":{"name":"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithmic fairness in social context\",\"authors\":\"Yunyou Huang ,&nbsp;Wenjing Liu ,&nbsp;Wanling Gao ,&nbsp;Xiangjiang Lu ,&nbsp;Xiaoshuang Liang ,&nbsp;Zhengxin Yang ,&nbsp;Hongxiao Li ,&nbsp;Li Ma ,&nbsp;Suqin Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Algorithmic fairness research is currently receiving significant attention, aiming to ensure that algorithms do not discriminate between different groups or individuals with similar characteristics. However, with the popularization of algorithms in all aspects of society, algorithms have changed from mere instruments to social infrastructure. For instance, facial recognition algorithms are widely used to provide user verification services and have become an indispensable part of many social infrastructures like transportation, health care, etc. As an instrument, an algorithm needs to pay attention to the fairness of its behavior. However, as a social infrastructure, it needs to pay even more attention to its impact on social fairness. Otherwise, it may exacerbate existing inequities or create new ones. For example, if an algorithm treats all passengers equally and eliminates special seats for pregnant women in the interest of fairness, it will increase the risk of pregnant women taking public transport and indirectly damage their right to fair travel. Therefore, algorithms have the responsibility to ensure social fairness, not just within their operations. It is now time to expand the concept of algorithmic fairness beyond mere behavioral equity, assessing algorithms in a broader societal context, and examining whether they uphold and promote social fairness. This article analyzes the current status and challenges of algorithmic fairness from three key perspectives: fairness definition, fairness dataset, and fairness algorithm. Furthermore, the potential directions and strategies to promote the fairness of the algorithm are proposed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772485923000546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772485923000546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

算法公平性研究目前正受到极大关注,旨在确保算法不会歧视具有相似特征的不同群体或个人。然而,随着算法在社会各方面的普及,算法已经从单纯的工具变成了社会基础设施。例如,面部识别算法被广泛用于提供用户验证服务,并已成为交通、医疗等许多社会基础设施不可或缺的一部分。作为一种工具,算法需要注意其行为的公平性。然而,作为一种社会基础设施,它需要更加关注其对社会公平的影响。否则,它可能会加剧现有的不平等现象或造成新的不平等。例如,如果一种算法平等对待所有乘客,并为了公平起见取消孕妇专用座位,这将增加孕妇乘坐公共交通工具的风险,并间接损害她们公平出行的权利。因此,算法有责任确保社会公平,而不仅仅是在其操作范围内。现在是时候将算法公平的概念扩展到行为公平之外,在更广泛的社会背景下评估算法,并检查它们是否维护和促进社会公平了。本文从公平定义、公平数据集和公平算法三个关键角度分析了算法公平的现状和挑战。此外,还提出了提高算法公平性的潜在方向和策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Algorithmic fairness in social context

Algorithmic fairness research is currently receiving significant attention, aiming to ensure that algorithms do not discriminate between different groups or individuals with similar characteristics. However, with the popularization of algorithms in all aspects of society, algorithms have changed from mere instruments to social infrastructure. For instance, facial recognition algorithms are widely used to provide user verification services and have become an indispensable part of many social infrastructures like transportation, health care, etc. As an instrument, an algorithm needs to pay attention to the fairness of its behavior. However, as a social infrastructure, it needs to pay even more attention to its impact on social fairness. Otherwise, it may exacerbate existing inequities or create new ones. For example, if an algorithm treats all passengers equally and eliminates special seats for pregnant women in the interest of fairness, it will increase the risk of pregnant women taking public transport and indirectly damage their right to fair travel. Therefore, algorithms have the responsibility to ensure social fairness, not just within their operations. It is now time to expand the concept of algorithmic fairness beyond mere behavioral equity, assessing algorithms in a broader societal context, and examining whether they uphold and promote social fairness. This article analyzes the current status and challenges of algorithmic fairness from three key perspectives: fairness definition, fairness dataset, and fairness algorithm. Furthermore, the potential directions and strategies to promote the fairness of the algorithm are proposed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of mechanical properties of natural fiber based polymer composite Could bibliometrics reveal top science and technology achievements and researchers? The case for evaluatology-based science and technology evaluation Table of Contents BinCodex: A comprehensive and multi-level dataset for evaluating binary code similarity detection techniques Analyzing the impact of opportunistic maintenance optimization on manufacturing industries in Bangladesh: An empirical study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1