{"title":"在试验台侧试验中未能将周围支架扩张至成人血管直径","authors":"R. Haddad, D. Bonnet, S. Malekzadeh-Milani","doi":"10.1016/j.acvdsp.2023.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Low-profile stent implantation remains a rescue treatment<span> for aortic coarctation and branch </span></span>pulmonary arteries stenosis in small children. Stent re-expansion to cope with vascular growth remains problematic.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate ex-vivo feasibility and mechanical behavior of over-dilating BeSmooth peripheral stents (Bentley InnoMed, Germany).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three BeSmooth stents in diameters of 7, 8, and 10<!--> <!-->mm were dilated to nominal pressure and then 13atm. Test-1 (sequential up-sizing post-dilation without re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø7<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->23<!--> <!-->mm was post-dilated using 12, 14, and 16<!--> <!-->mm high-pressure balloons. Test-2 (post-dilation until plateau/breakpoint then re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø10<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->57<!--> <!-->mm was post-dilated with 14<!--> <!-->mm balloon until plateau/breakpoint and then with 48<!--> <!-->mm bare-metal Optimus-XXL stent hand-mounted on 14<!--> <!-->mm balloon. Test-3 (straightforward re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø8<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->57<!--> <!-->mm was directly post-dilated with 48<!--> <!-->mm bare-metal Optimus-XXL stent hand-mounted on 16<!--> <span>mm balloon. The stents’ diameter and length were measured. Balloon rupture and stent fracture patterns were closely evaluated.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results/Expected results</h3><p>Test-1: BeSmooth Ø7<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->23<!--> <!-->mm was post-dilated to 10<!--> <!-->mm diameter with a little shortening. Up-sizing the stent to 11<!--> <!-->mm with the Ø14<!--> <!-->mm balloon led to the stent shrinking to 3.2<!--> <!-->mm. At 20atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø7<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->23<!--> <!-->mm shortened to 2<!--> <!-->mm forming a 12<!--> <!-->mm diameter solid ring circle, and the 16<!--> <!-->mm woven balloon ruptured radially. Test-2: The BeSmooth Ø10<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->23<!--> <!-->mm reached a plateau diameter of 13<!--> <!-->mm without shortening and the balloon did not rupture. Stent-in-stent re-expansion showed that at 10atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø10<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->57<!--> <!-->mm fractured longitudinally in various dispatched breaking points at a diameter of 13<!--> <!-->mm without shortening and ruptured the balloon with multiple pinholes. Test-3: At 10atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø8<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->57<!--> <!-->mm fractured centrally at three different points at a diameter of 11.5<!--> <!-->mm without shortening and the balloon broke radially in half.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion/Perspectives</h3><p>In our benchmark tests, extreme shortening, severe balloon rupture, or unpredictable stent fracture patterns at small balloon diameters limits the safe post-dilation of BeSmooth stents beyond 13<!--> <!-->mm. BeSmooth stents are not ideal candidates for off-label stent interventions in smaller patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8140,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements","volume":"15 4","pages":"Page 280"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failure to post-dilate BeSmooth peripheral stents to adult vessel size diameters during bench-side tests\",\"authors\":\"R. Haddad, D. Bonnet, S. Malekzadeh-Milani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acvdsp.2023.07.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Low-profile stent implantation remains a rescue treatment<span> for aortic coarctation and branch </span></span>pulmonary arteries stenosis in small children. Stent re-expansion to cope with vascular growth remains problematic.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate ex-vivo feasibility and mechanical behavior of over-dilating BeSmooth peripheral stents (Bentley InnoMed, Germany).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three BeSmooth stents in diameters of 7, 8, and 10<!--> <!-->mm were dilated to nominal pressure and then 13atm. Test-1 (sequential up-sizing post-dilation without re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø7<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->23<!--> <!-->mm was post-dilated using 12, 14, and 16<!--> <!-->mm high-pressure balloons. Test-2 (post-dilation until plateau/breakpoint then re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø10<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->57<!--> <!-->mm was post-dilated with 14<!--> <!-->mm balloon until plateau/breakpoint and then with 48<!--> <!-->mm bare-metal Optimus-XXL stent hand-mounted on 14<!--> <!-->mm balloon. Test-3 (straightforward re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø8<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->57<!--> <!-->mm was directly post-dilated with 48<!--> <!-->mm bare-metal Optimus-XXL stent hand-mounted on 16<!--> <span>mm balloon. The stents’ diameter and length were measured. Balloon rupture and stent fracture patterns were closely evaluated.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results/Expected results</h3><p>Test-1: BeSmooth Ø7<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->23<!--> <!-->mm was post-dilated to 10<!--> <!-->mm diameter with a little shortening. Up-sizing the stent to 11<!--> <!-->mm with the Ø14<!--> <!-->mm balloon led to the stent shrinking to 3.2<!--> <!-->mm. At 20atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø7<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->23<!--> <!-->mm shortened to 2<!--> <!-->mm forming a 12<!--> <!-->mm diameter solid ring circle, and the 16<!--> <!-->mm woven balloon ruptured radially. Test-2: The BeSmooth Ø10<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->23<!--> <!-->mm reached a plateau diameter of 13<!--> <!-->mm without shortening and the balloon did not rupture. Stent-in-stent re-expansion showed that at 10atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø10<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->57<!--> <!-->mm fractured longitudinally in various dispatched breaking points at a diameter of 13<!--> <!-->mm without shortening and ruptured the balloon with multiple pinholes. Test-3: At 10atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø8<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->57<!--> <!-->mm fractured centrally at three different points at a diameter of 11.5<!--> <!-->mm without shortening and the balloon broke radially in half.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion/Perspectives</h3><p>In our benchmark tests, extreme shortening, severe balloon rupture, or unpredictable stent fracture patterns at small balloon diameters limits the safe post-dilation of BeSmooth stents beyond 13<!--> <!-->mm. BeSmooth stents are not ideal candidates for off-label stent interventions in smaller patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"Page 280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":18.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878648023002367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878648023002367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Failure to post-dilate BeSmooth peripheral stents to adult vessel size diameters during bench-side tests
Introduction
Low-profile stent implantation remains a rescue treatment for aortic coarctation and branch pulmonary arteries stenosis in small children. Stent re-expansion to cope with vascular growth remains problematic.
Objective
To evaluate ex-vivo feasibility and mechanical behavior of over-dilating BeSmooth peripheral stents (Bentley InnoMed, Germany).
Methods
Three BeSmooth stents in diameters of 7, 8, and 10 mm were dilated to nominal pressure and then 13atm. Test-1 (sequential up-sizing post-dilation without re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø7 × 23 mm was post-dilated using 12, 14, and 16 mm high-pressure balloons. Test-2 (post-dilation until plateau/breakpoint then re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø10 × 57 mm was post-dilated with 14 mm balloon until plateau/breakpoint and then with 48 mm bare-metal Optimus-XXL stent hand-mounted on 14 mm balloon. Test-3 (straightforward re-stenting): BeSmooth Ø8 × 57 mm was directly post-dilated with 48 mm bare-metal Optimus-XXL stent hand-mounted on 16 mm balloon. The stents’ diameter and length were measured. Balloon rupture and stent fracture patterns were closely evaluated.
Results/Expected results
Test-1: BeSmooth Ø7 × 23 mm was post-dilated to 10 mm diameter with a little shortening. Up-sizing the stent to 11 mm with the Ø14 mm balloon led to the stent shrinking to 3.2 mm. At 20atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø7 × 23 mm shortened to 2 mm forming a 12 mm diameter solid ring circle, and the 16 mm woven balloon ruptured radially. Test-2: The BeSmooth Ø10 × 23 mm reached a plateau diameter of 13 mm without shortening and the balloon did not rupture. Stent-in-stent re-expansion showed that at 10atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø10 × 57 mm fractured longitudinally in various dispatched breaking points at a diameter of 13 mm without shortening and ruptured the balloon with multiple pinholes. Test-3: At 10atm pressure, BeSmooth Ø8 × 57 mm fractured centrally at three different points at a diameter of 11.5 mm without shortening and the balloon broke radially in half.
Conclusion/Perspectives
In our benchmark tests, extreme shortening, severe balloon rupture, or unpredictable stent fracture patterns at small balloon diameters limits the safe post-dilation of BeSmooth stents beyond 13 mm. BeSmooth stents are not ideal candidates for off-label stent interventions in smaller patients.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements is the official journal of the French Society of Cardiology. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles, editorials, and Images in cardiovascular medicine. The topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Additionally, Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.