经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射的技术和安全实践模式的更新

Ashley E. Gureck , Berkenesh Gebrekristos , Razvan Turcu , Dana Kotler , Alec L. Meleger
{"title":"经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射的技术和安全实践模式的更新","authors":"Ashley E. Gureck ,&nbsp;Berkenesh Gebrekristos ,&nbsp;Razvan Turcu ,&nbsp;Dana Kotler ,&nbsp;Alec L. Meleger","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Previous studies have suggested variability in practice patterns for transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) despite published safety guidance. The purpose of this study was to understand recent trends in periprocedural safety practices in TFESIs and how some aspects of interventional pain practice may have been influenced by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and related supply chain shortages.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 91-item survey was distributed to 111 program directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited Pain Management fellowships, 42 North American Spine Society and Interventional Spine and Musculoskeletal Medicine recognized fellowship directors, and 100 private practice interventional pain physicians to capture current practices in epidural steroid injections from March 2021 to March 2022. Additional responses were obtained through advertising on social media platforms consisting of interventional pain physicians. Cross sectional data from survey responses specific to TFESI-related practices were gathered and analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 103 complete survey responses, 102 physicians perform TFESIs (cervical, 33.3%; thoracic, 40.2%; lumbar, 100%; sacral, 89.2%). There was variability in preprocedural imaging review, sedation practices, contrast and fluoroscopy techniques, and type and dose of steroid preferred. Many physicians saw a decrease in number of procedures performed weekly as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There remains practice variability in various periprocedural aspects of TFESIs despite existing safety recommendations. Further research is needed to identify ongoing barriers to adherence to established guidelines. Recent practice trends may have been affected by unique challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, and these trends should be considered in the event of future supply chain limitations and/or need for disaster response.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An update on technical and safety practice patterns in transforaminal epidural steroid injections\",\"authors\":\"Ashley E. Gureck ,&nbsp;Berkenesh Gebrekristos ,&nbsp;Razvan Turcu ,&nbsp;Dana Kotler ,&nbsp;Alec L. Meleger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Previous studies have suggested variability in practice patterns for transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) despite published safety guidance. The purpose of this study was to understand recent trends in periprocedural safety practices in TFESIs and how some aspects of interventional pain practice may have been influenced by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and related supply chain shortages.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 91-item survey was distributed to 111 program directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited Pain Management fellowships, 42 North American Spine Society and Interventional Spine and Musculoskeletal Medicine recognized fellowship directors, and 100 private practice interventional pain physicians to capture current practices in epidural steroid injections from March 2021 to March 2022. Additional responses were obtained through advertising on social media platforms consisting of interventional pain physicians. Cross sectional data from survey responses specific to TFESI-related practices were gathered and analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 103 complete survey responses, 102 physicians perform TFESIs (cervical, 33.3%; thoracic, 40.2%; lumbar, 100%; sacral, 89.2%). There was variability in preprocedural imaging review, sedation practices, contrast and fluoroscopy techniques, and type and dose of steroid preferred. Many physicians saw a decrease in number of procedures performed weekly as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There remains practice variability in various periprocedural aspects of TFESIs despite existing safety recommendations. Further research is needed to identify ongoing barriers to adherence to established guidelines. Recent practice trends may have been affected by unique challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, and these trends should be considered in the event of future supply chain limitations and/or need for disaster response.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594423001188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594423001188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言先前的研究表明,尽管发布了安全指南,但经孔硬膜外类固醇注射(TFESI)的实践模式存在差异。本研究的目的是了解TFESI围手术期安全实践的最新趋势,以及介入疼痛实践的某些方面可能受到2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行和相关供应链短缺的影响。方法将91项调查分发给111名研究生医学教育认证委员会认可的疼痛管理奖学金项目主任、42名北美脊柱学会和介入性脊柱和肌肉骨骼医学认可的奖学金主任,以及100名私人执业介入疼痛医生,以了解2021年3月至2022年3月硬膜外类固醇注射的当前实践。通过由介入疼痛医生组成的社交媒体平台上的广告获得了额外的回应。收集并分析了针对TFESI相关实践的调查回复的横断面数据。结果在103份完整的调查回复中,102名医生进行了TFESI(颈部,33.3%;胸部,40.2%;腰部,100%;骶骨,89.2%)。硬膜前影像学检查、镇静实践、对比和荧光透视技术以及首选类固醇的类型和剂量存在差异。许多医生认为,由于新冠肺炎大流行,每周进行的手术数量有所减少。结论尽管已有安全性建议,但TFESI的各个围手术期方面仍存在实践差异。需要进一步研究,以确定遵守既定准则的持续障碍。最近的实践趋势可能受到新冠肺炎大流行带来的独特挑战的影响,在未来供应链受到限制和/或需要救灾的情况下,应考虑这些趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An update on technical and safety practice patterns in transforaminal epidural steroid injections

Introduction

Previous studies have suggested variability in practice patterns for transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) despite published safety guidance. The purpose of this study was to understand recent trends in periprocedural safety practices in TFESIs and how some aspects of interventional pain practice may have been influenced by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and related supply chain shortages.

Methods

A 91-item survey was distributed to 111 program directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited Pain Management fellowships, 42 North American Spine Society and Interventional Spine and Musculoskeletal Medicine recognized fellowship directors, and 100 private practice interventional pain physicians to capture current practices in epidural steroid injections from March 2021 to March 2022. Additional responses were obtained through advertising on social media platforms consisting of interventional pain physicians. Cross sectional data from survey responses specific to TFESI-related practices were gathered and analyzed.

Results

Of 103 complete survey responses, 102 physicians perform TFESIs (cervical, 33.3%; thoracic, 40.2%; lumbar, 100%; sacral, 89.2%). There was variability in preprocedural imaging review, sedation practices, contrast and fluoroscopy techniques, and type and dose of steroid preferred. Many physicians saw a decrease in number of procedures performed weekly as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions

There remains practice variability in various periprocedural aspects of TFESIs despite existing safety recommendations. Further research is needed to identify ongoing barriers to adherence to established guidelines. Recent practice trends may have been affected by unique challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, and these trends should be considered in the event of future supply chain limitations and/or need for disaster response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reddit users' perspectives on radiofrequency ablation: A data analysis. Intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation: A 5-year pooled analysis from three prospective clinical trials. Evaluating the effectiveness of interlaminar epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy using PROMIS as an outcome measure. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Postherpetic neuralgia mimicking lumbar radiculopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1