不成功的中尿道吊带分离与骨盆疼痛的发展和持续有关:一个病例系列

Eva Fong , Vincent Tse
{"title":"不成功的中尿道吊带分离与骨盆疼痛的发展和持续有关:一个病例系列","authors":"Eva Fong ,&nbsp;Vincent Tse","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2023.100034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction:</h3><p>Voiding dysfunction following mid-urethral synthetic sling surgery is a well-recognized complication with an established treatment algorithm.</p><p>Our case series describes patients with clinically significant voiding dysfunction where a decision to proceed to early sling release (&lt;12 months) was made and operatively attempted but subsequent presentation shows the sling was not successfully divided.</p></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><p>Retrospective case series of 16 women from a database of 330 women who underwent treatment for mid-urethral synthetic sling (MUSS) complications between 2014 and 2023 in Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>We found 16 patients with unrecognized unsuccessful sling division, from database of 330 mesh complications Initially, after sling implantation, these patients presented with characteristic obstructive symptoms including 8/16 having post-operative retention with failed TROC and prolonged catheterization or CIC.</p><p>The median time to first sling division for symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction was 9 months. Median time from implantation to the second (or definitive division) was 82 months.</p><p>Urodynamic findings after first unsuccessful division were median Qmax of 12 mls/s and median Pdet@max of 32cmh20.</p><p>Comparison of pre- and post-operative findings after delayed successful sling division showed significant improvement in recurrent UTIs (from 10/14 to 1/14). However, there was little improvement in pelvic pain/dyspareunia (from 9 to 7/14) and overactive bladder symptoms (9 to 6/14). One patient had a critical outcome, requiring cystectomy for pelvic pain and bladder pain following successful division.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion:</h3><p>This case series is the first to describe unrecognized, unsuccessful sling division for post-operative voiding dysfunction documented by subsequent objective radiologic and/or operative findings.</p><p>The clinical course shows significant urinary and pelvic pain morbidity after the failed division although it is difficult to ascribe causation with a retrospective lens.</p><p>These findings suggest that a high index of suspicion and low threshold for investigation should be maintained where clinical symptoms persist after a sling division.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unsuccessful mid-urethral sling division is associated with development and persistence of pelvic pain: A case series\",\"authors\":\"Eva Fong ,&nbsp;Vincent Tse\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contre.2023.100034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction:</h3><p>Voiding dysfunction following mid-urethral synthetic sling surgery is a well-recognized complication with an established treatment algorithm.</p><p>Our case series describes patients with clinically significant voiding dysfunction where a decision to proceed to early sling release (&lt;12 months) was made and operatively attempted but subsequent presentation shows the sling was not successfully divided.</p></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><p>Retrospective case series of 16 women from a database of 330 women who underwent treatment for mid-urethral synthetic sling (MUSS) complications between 2014 and 2023 in Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>We found 16 patients with unrecognized unsuccessful sling division, from database of 330 mesh complications Initially, after sling implantation, these patients presented with characteristic obstructive symptoms including 8/16 having post-operative retention with failed TROC and prolonged catheterization or CIC.</p><p>The median time to first sling division for symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction was 9 months. Median time from implantation to the second (or definitive division) was 82 months.</p><p>Urodynamic findings after first unsuccessful division were median Qmax of 12 mls/s and median Pdet@max of 32cmh20.</p><p>Comparison of pre- and post-operative findings after delayed successful sling division showed significant improvement in recurrent UTIs (from 10/14 to 1/14). However, there was little improvement in pelvic pain/dyspareunia (from 9 to 7/14) and overactive bladder symptoms (9 to 6/14). One patient had a critical outcome, requiring cystectomy for pelvic pain and bladder pain following successful division.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion:</h3><p>This case series is the first to describe unrecognized, unsuccessful sling division for post-operative voiding dysfunction documented by subsequent objective radiologic and/or operative findings.</p><p>The clinical course shows significant urinary and pelvic pain morbidity after the failed division although it is difficult to ascribe causation with a retrospective lens.</p><p>These findings suggest that a high index of suspicion and low threshold for investigation should be maintained where clinical symptoms persist after a sling division.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Continence Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Continence Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974523000145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continence Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974523000145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:尿道中段合成吊带手术后的排尿功能障碍是一种公认的并发症,有既定的治疗算法。我们的病例系列描述了具有临床意义的排尿功能障碍的患者,他们决定进行早期吊带释放(<;12个月),并尝试进行手术,但随后的表现显示吊带未成功分割。方法:回顾性分析2014年至2023年间在新西兰和澳大利亚接受尿道中段合成吊带(MUSS)并发症治疗的330名女性数据库中的16名女性,这些患者表现出特征性梗阻症状,包括8/16例术后因TROC失败和导管插入术或CIC延长而出现滞留。膀胱出口梗阻症状的中位时间为9个月。从植入到第二次(或最终分割)的中位时间为82个月。第一次分割失败后的尿动力学结果为中位数Qmax为12 mls/s,中位数Pdet@max32cmh20。吊带切开延迟成功后的术前和术后结果比较显示,复发性尿路感染有显著改善(从10/14到1/14)。然而,骨盆疼痛/性交困难(2014年9月至7月)和膀胱过度活动症状(2014年6月至9月)几乎没有改善。一名患者的结果很关键,在成功分割后,需要对骨盆疼痛和膀胱疼痛进行膀胱切除术。讨论:该病例系列首次描述了未被识别的、不成功的吊带分割术后排尿功能障碍,随后的客观放射学和/或手术结果记录了这一情况。尽管很难用回顾性的方法来确定病因,但临床过程显示,分割失败后有显著的泌尿系和盆腔疼痛发病率。这些发现表明,如果吊带手术后临床症状持续存在,应保持高怀疑指数和低调查阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unsuccessful mid-urethral sling division is associated with development and persistence of pelvic pain: A case series

Introduction:

Voiding dysfunction following mid-urethral synthetic sling surgery is a well-recognized complication with an established treatment algorithm.

Our case series describes patients with clinically significant voiding dysfunction where a decision to proceed to early sling release (<12 months) was made and operatively attempted but subsequent presentation shows the sling was not successfully divided.

Methods:

Retrospective case series of 16 women from a database of 330 women who underwent treatment for mid-urethral synthetic sling (MUSS) complications between 2014 and 2023 in Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia.

Results:

We found 16 patients with unrecognized unsuccessful sling division, from database of 330 mesh complications Initially, after sling implantation, these patients presented with characteristic obstructive symptoms including 8/16 having post-operative retention with failed TROC and prolonged catheterization or CIC.

The median time to first sling division for symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction was 9 months. Median time from implantation to the second (or definitive division) was 82 months.

Urodynamic findings after first unsuccessful division were median Qmax of 12 mls/s and median Pdet@max of 32cmh20.

Comparison of pre- and post-operative findings after delayed successful sling division showed significant improvement in recurrent UTIs (from 10/14 to 1/14). However, there was little improvement in pelvic pain/dyspareunia (from 9 to 7/14) and overactive bladder symptoms (9 to 6/14). One patient had a critical outcome, requiring cystectomy for pelvic pain and bladder pain following successful division.

Discussion:

This case series is the first to describe unrecognized, unsuccessful sling division for post-operative voiding dysfunction documented by subsequent objective radiologic and/or operative findings.

The clinical course shows significant urinary and pelvic pain morbidity after the failed division although it is difficult to ascribe causation with a retrospective lens.

These findings suggest that a high index of suspicion and low threshold for investigation should be maintained where clinical symptoms persist after a sling division.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Underweight, dementia, and not being completely independent in bowel management are risk factors for urinary incontinence among older people Diagnosis and treatment of nocturnal enuresis throughout the ages The medical management of lower urinary tract symptoms during the nineteenth century The history of prosthetic devices for postprostatectomy incontinence Female urethroplasty using urethral diverticulum tissue as a graft
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1