小银行经理是谨慎的:用本福德定律分析贷款损失补偿

IF 3.3 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106128
Arthur M. Tran , Mark D. Griffiths , Drew B. Winters
{"title":"小银行经理是谨慎的:用本福德定律分析贷款损失补偿","authors":"Arthur M. Tran ,&nbsp;Mark D. Griffiths ,&nbsp;Drew B. Winters","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using an analysis of the two leading digits based on Benford’s Law, we analyze rounding patterns in loan loss allowances (LLAs) for a bank sample based on good and bad times, net income, profitability, bank size, regulatory level, and whether the banks are private or public. We find clear evidence of upward rounding during good times. Banks that are smaller, private, and subject to more lenient regulatory and supervisory levels also tend to round LLAs upward more than their larger, public, and more heavily regulated counterparts. The results are consistent with previous studies supporting non-opportunistic incentives (including signaling, reducing pro-cyclicality, and pursuing prudence and efficiency) under which bank managers increase the LLA. In addition to shedding more light on the ongoing debate about the management of provisioning for loan losses, we present an argument for why the rounding mechanism in LLAs is a rational consequence of U.S. commercial banks being subjected to opposing regulatory forces coming from bank regulators and securities regulators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47522,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 106128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Small bank managers are prudent: A Benford’s Law approach to analyzing loan loss allowances\",\"authors\":\"Arthur M. Tran ,&nbsp;Mark D. Griffiths ,&nbsp;Drew B. Winters\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using an analysis of the two leading digits based on Benford’s Law, we analyze rounding patterns in loan loss allowances (LLAs) for a bank sample based on good and bad times, net income, profitability, bank size, regulatory level, and whether the banks are private or public. We find clear evidence of upward rounding during good times. Banks that are smaller, private, and subject to more lenient regulatory and supervisory levels also tend to round LLAs upward more than their larger, public, and more heavily regulated counterparts. The results are consistent with previous studies supporting non-opportunistic incentives (including signaling, reducing pro-cyclicality, and pursuing prudence and efficiency) under which bank managers increase the LLA. In addition to shedding more light on the ongoing debate about the management of provisioning for loan losses, we present an argument for why the rounding mechanism in LLAs is a rational consequence of U.S. commercial banks being subjected to opposing regulatory forces coming from bank regulators and securities regulators.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148619523000218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148619523000218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用基于Benford定律的两个领先数字的分析,我们根据好时光和坏时光、净收入、盈利能力、银行规模、监管水平以及银行是私人银行还是公共银行,分析了银行样本的贷款损失准备金(LLA)的四舍五入模式。我们发现了在经济繁荣时期向上取整的明显证据。规模较小、私营且受更宽松的监管和监督级别约束的银行也往往比规模较大、公共且监管更严格的同行更倾向于上调LLA。这一结果与之前支持银行经理提高LLA的非机会主义激励(包括信号传导、减少顺周期性以及追求谨慎和效率)的研究一致。除了进一步阐明正在进行的关于贷款损失准备金管理的辩论外,我们还提出了一个论点,解释为什么LLA中的舍入机制是美国商业银行受到来自银行监管机构和证券监管机构的反对监管力量的合理后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Small bank managers are prudent: A Benford’s Law approach to analyzing loan loss allowances

Using an analysis of the two leading digits based on Benford’s Law, we analyze rounding patterns in loan loss allowances (LLAs) for a bank sample based on good and bad times, net income, profitability, bank size, regulatory level, and whether the banks are private or public. We find clear evidence of upward rounding during good times. Banks that are smaller, private, and subject to more lenient regulatory and supervisory levels also tend to round LLAs upward more than their larger, public, and more heavily regulated counterparts. The results are consistent with previous studies supporting non-opportunistic incentives (including signaling, reducing pro-cyclicality, and pursuing prudence and efficiency) under which bank managers increase the LLA. In addition to shedding more light on the ongoing debate about the management of provisioning for loan losses, we present an argument for why the rounding mechanism in LLAs is a rational consequence of U.S. commercial banks being subjected to opposing regulatory forces coming from bank regulators and securities regulators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Journal of Economics and Business: Studies in Corporate and Financial Behavior. The Journal publishes high quality research papers in all fields of finance and in closely related fields of economics. The Journal is interested in both theoretical and applied research with an emphasis on topics in corporate finance, financial markets and institutions, and investments. Research in real estate, insurance, monetary theory and policy, and industrial organization is also welcomed. Papers that deal with the relation between the financial structure of firms and the industrial structure of the product market are especially encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Panic herding: Analysts' COVID-19 experiences and the interpretation of earnings news Banking sustainability in a large emerging economy: Focus on Brazilian banks Debt and debt tax benefit: Evidence from Indonesia debt-to-equity cap reform Inflation targeting and output stabilization in an estimated monetary model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1