对马辅助服务的基本地面技能评估进行验证

Sarah J. Andersen , Michael L. Pate , Judy Smith , Holly Clement , Rose Judd-Murray
{"title":"对马辅助服务的基本地面技能评估进行验证","authors":"Sarah J. Andersen ,&nbsp;Michael L. Pate ,&nbsp;Judy Smith ,&nbsp;Holly Clement ,&nbsp;Rose Judd-Murray","doi":"10.1016/j.eas.2023.100030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Equine-assisted services (EAS) utilize equines in various therapies, educational sessions, and adaptive horsemanship lessons to meet a variety of emotional, mental, physical, psychological, social, and horsemanship goals for individuals with diverse needs. During participant interactions with horses, it is important to consider the risks that equines pose as they are animals prone to fight and flight behaviors. The Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship International recommends that equines should be evaluated for suitability to participate in EAS prior to their participation so that the risks associated with equine-human interactions can be properly managed. To assess equines for EAS, the Basic Ground Skills Assessment (BGSA) was developed and subsequently tested for validity and reliability. Fourteen lesson horses were assessed on BGSA competencies by an EAS professional. Heart rate, an indicator of stress levels that is correlated to safe and unsafe equine behaviors, was collected throughout the testing and compared to each horse’s average BGSA scores as assigned by the rater. This comparison demonstrated that the BGSA was a valid (<em>r</em> = −0.947, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) predictor of equine stress levels and thus a valid indicator of horse behavior. Additionally, two EAS professionals rated a horse using the BGSA to determine inter- and intra-rater reliability. Score comparisons revealed that inter-rater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.769; <em>p</em> &lt; .018) and intra-rater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.769; <em>p</em> &lt; .018). Further work should be done to develop and define an objective, valid, and reliable EAS equine assessment process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100464,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Animal Species","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a basic ground skills assessment for equine-assisted services\",\"authors\":\"Sarah J. Andersen ,&nbsp;Michael L. Pate ,&nbsp;Judy Smith ,&nbsp;Holly Clement ,&nbsp;Rose Judd-Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eas.2023.100030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Equine-assisted services (EAS) utilize equines in various therapies, educational sessions, and adaptive horsemanship lessons to meet a variety of emotional, mental, physical, psychological, social, and horsemanship goals for individuals with diverse needs. During participant interactions with horses, it is important to consider the risks that equines pose as they are animals prone to fight and flight behaviors. The Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship International recommends that equines should be evaluated for suitability to participate in EAS prior to their participation so that the risks associated with equine-human interactions can be properly managed. To assess equines for EAS, the Basic Ground Skills Assessment (BGSA) was developed and subsequently tested for validity and reliability. Fourteen lesson horses were assessed on BGSA competencies by an EAS professional. Heart rate, an indicator of stress levels that is correlated to safe and unsafe equine behaviors, was collected throughout the testing and compared to each horse’s average BGSA scores as assigned by the rater. This comparison demonstrated that the BGSA was a valid (<em>r</em> = −0.947, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) predictor of equine stress levels and thus a valid indicator of horse behavior. Additionally, two EAS professionals rated a horse using the BGSA to determine inter- and intra-rater reliability. Score comparisons revealed that inter-rater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.769; <em>p</em> &lt; .018) and intra-rater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.769; <em>p</em> &lt; .018). Further work should be done to develop and define an objective, valid, and reliable EAS equine assessment process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerging Animal Species\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerging Animal Species\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772813723000094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Animal Species","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772813723000094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

马辅助服务(EAS)利用马进行各种治疗、教育课程和适应性马术课程,以满足不同需求的个人的各种情感、心理、身体、心理、社会和马术目标。在参与者与马的互动过程中,重要的是要考虑马的风险,因为它们是容易打架和逃跑的动物。国际马术治疗专业协会建议,在马参加EAS之前,应评估马是否适合参加,以便妥善管理与马与人互动相关的风险。为了评估马的EAS,开发了基础地面技能评估(BGSA),并随后进行了有效性和可靠性测试。EAS的一名专业人员对14节课的马进行了BGSA能力评估。心率是一种与马的安全和不安全行为相关的压力水平指标,在整个测试过程中进行了收集,并与评分者指定的每匹马的平均BGSA分数进行了比较。这一比较表明,BGSA是马应激水平的有效预测因子(r=-0.947,p<;.001),因此是马行为的有效指标。此外,两名EAS专业人员使用BGSA对一匹马进行评分,以确定评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性。评分比较显示,评分者之间的可靠性为中等(κ=0.769;p<;.018),评分者内部的可靠性为中度(κ=0.799;p<;0.018)。应该做进一步的工作来制定和定义一个客观、有效和可靠的EAS马评估过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a basic ground skills assessment for equine-assisted services

Equine-assisted services (EAS) utilize equines in various therapies, educational sessions, and adaptive horsemanship lessons to meet a variety of emotional, mental, physical, psychological, social, and horsemanship goals for individuals with diverse needs. During participant interactions with horses, it is important to consider the risks that equines pose as they are animals prone to fight and flight behaviors. The Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship International recommends that equines should be evaluated for suitability to participate in EAS prior to their participation so that the risks associated with equine-human interactions can be properly managed. To assess equines for EAS, the Basic Ground Skills Assessment (BGSA) was developed and subsequently tested for validity and reliability. Fourteen lesson horses were assessed on BGSA competencies by an EAS professional. Heart rate, an indicator of stress levels that is correlated to safe and unsafe equine behaviors, was collected throughout the testing and compared to each horse’s average BGSA scores as assigned by the rater. This comparison demonstrated that the BGSA was a valid (r = −0.947, p < .001) predictor of equine stress levels and thus a valid indicator of horse behavior. Additionally, two EAS professionals rated a horse using the BGSA to determine inter- and intra-rater reliability. Score comparisons revealed that inter-rater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.769; p < .018) and intra-rater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.769; p < .018). Further work should be done to develop and define an objective, valid, and reliable EAS equine assessment process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intestinal diverticula in a domestic rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) Suspected encrusting cystitis in a domestic ferret (Mustela putorius furo) Effects of prenatal exposure to pequi oil and 17α-Ethinylestradiol on folliculogenesis in gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) ovaries Pathology of coccidiosis in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) Nutritional value of meat from selected neotropical reptiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1