在初级保健环境中识别有Barrett食管风险患者的筛查标准的性能特征

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tige.2023.07.001
Shashank Garg , Usman Akbar , Molly Stewart , Alisha Menon , Hye Jeong Jang , Arvind J. Trindade
{"title":"在初级保健环境中识别有Barrett食管风险患者的筛查标准的性能特征","authors":"Shashank Garg ,&nbsp;Usman Akbar ,&nbsp;Molly Stewart ,&nbsp;Alisha Menon ,&nbsp;Hye Jeong Jang ,&nbsp;Arvind J. Trindade","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2023.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p><span>Several criteria have been developed for screening of Barrett's esophagus (BE). Previous studies are limited by analysis in highly selective populations. This study evaluated the performance of 4 criteria in identifying patients with BE from a </span>primary care population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This was a post-hoc analysis from a previous retrospective study reporting on BE screening rates of eligible patients in a large health system<span>. Patients were included if they were screened in a primary care population for BE, were at risk for BE per 1 of the accepted criteria, and underwent screening with esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Sensitivity for BE was calculated for 4 screening criteria. These included criteria from the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), American Society of </span></span>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), and the Kunzmann model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In a primary care population, 1077 patients were screened for BE with an esophagogastroduodenoscopy. BE was found in 105 (9.75%) patients. Positive predictive values and negative predictive values of ACG/ESGE, ASGE, and Kunzmann's criteria for BE on pathology were 9.9% and 90.45%, 9.12% and 89.22%, and 10.84% and 92.29%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ACG/ESGE, ASGE, and Kunzmann's criteria was 50.49%, 52.23%, and 54.04%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the presence of BE on pathology among patients who did or did not meet ACG/ESGE, ASGE, or Kunzmann's criteria for BE screening.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Current BE screening criteria need optimization in a primary care setting. Use of a combination of criteria might capture the highest number of BE patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Characteristics of Screening Criteria to Identify Patients at Risk of Barrett's Esophagus in a Primary Care Setting\",\"authors\":\"Shashank Garg ,&nbsp;Usman Akbar ,&nbsp;Molly Stewart ,&nbsp;Alisha Menon ,&nbsp;Hye Jeong Jang ,&nbsp;Arvind J. Trindade\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tige.2023.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p><span>Several criteria have been developed for screening of Barrett's esophagus (BE). Previous studies are limited by analysis in highly selective populations. This study evaluated the performance of 4 criteria in identifying patients with BE from a </span>primary care population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This was a post-hoc analysis from a previous retrospective study reporting on BE screening rates of eligible patients in a large health system<span>. Patients were included if they were screened in a primary care population for BE, were at risk for BE per 1 of the accepted criteria, and underwent screening with esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Sensitivity for BE was calculated for 4 screening criteria. These included criteria from the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), American Society of </span></span>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), and the Kunzmann model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In a primary care population, 1077 patients were screened for BE with an esophagogastroduodenoscopy. BE was found in 105 (9.75%) patients. Positive predictive values and negative predictive values of ACG/ESGE, ASGE, and Kunzmann's criteria for BE on pathology were 9.9% and 90.45%, 9.12% and 89.22%, and 10.84% and 92.29%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ACG/ESGE, ASGE, and Kunzmann's criteria was 50.49%, 52.23%, and 54.04%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the presence of BE on pathology among patients who did or did not meet ACG/ESGE, ASGE, or Kunzmann's criteria for BE screening.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Current BE screening criteria need optimization in a primary care setting. Use of a combination of criteria might capture the highest number of BE patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030723000557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030723000557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的已经制定了一些筛查巴雷特食管(BE)的标准。先前的研究受到高度选择性人群分析的限制。本研究评估了从初级保健人群中识别BE患者的4个标准的性能。方法这是对先前一项回顾性研究的事后分析,该研究报告了大型卫生系统中符合条件的患者的BE筛查率。如果患者在初级保健人群中进行了BE筛查,根据1项公认标准有BE风险,并接受了食管胃十二指肠镜筛查,则将其包括在内。根据4个筛选标准计算BE的敏感性。这些标准包括美国胃肠病学会(ACG)、美国胃肠内窥镜学会(ASGE)、欧洲胃肠内窥镜中窥镜协会(ESGE)和Kunzmann模型。结果在初级保健人群中,1077名患者通过食管胃十二指肠镜筛查BE。在105例(9.75%)患者中发现BE。ACG/ESGE、ASGE和Kunzmann标准对BE病理学的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为9.9%和90.45%、9.12%和89.22%、10.84%和92.29%。ACG/ESGE、ASGE和Kunzmann标准的受试者工作特性曲线下面积分别为50.49%、52.23%和54.04%。在符合或不符合ACG/ESGE、ASGE或Kunzmann BE筛查标准的患者中,BE在病理学上的存在没有统计学上的显著差异。结论目前BE筛查标准需要在初级保健环境中进行优化。使用多种标准的组合可能会获得最高数量的BE患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Characteristics of Screening Criteria to Identify Patients at Risk of Barrett's Esophagus in a Primary Care Setting

Background and Aims

Several criteria have been developed for screening of Barrett's esophagus (BE). Previous studies are limited by analysis in highly selective populations. This study evaluated the performance of 4 criteria in identifying patients with BE from a primary care population.

Methods

This was a post-hoc analysis from a previous retrospective study reporting on BE screening rates of eligible patients in a large health system. Patients were included if they were screened in a primary care population for BE, were at risk for BE per 1 of the accepted criteria, and underwent screening with esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Sensitivity for BE was calculated for 4 screening criteria. These included criteria from the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), and the Kunzmann model.

Results

In a primary care population, 1077 patients were screened for BE with an esophagogastroduodenoscopy. BE was found in 105 (9.75%) patients. Positive predictive values and negative predictive values of ACG/ESGE, ASGE, and Kunzmann's criteria for BE on pathology were 9.9% and 90.45%, 9.12% and 89.22%, and 10.84% and 92.29%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ACG/ESGE, ASGE, and Kunzmann's criteria was 50.49%, 52.23%, and 54.04%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the presence of BE on pathology among patients who did or did not meet ACG/ESGE, ASGE, or Kunzmann's criteria for BE screening.

Conclusion

Current BE screening criteria need optimization in a primary care setting. Use of a combination of criteria might capture the highest number of BE patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Editorial Board Table of Contents Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1