侧性在内镜下切除高度发育不良结肠腺瘤中的预后意义

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tige.2023.07.003
Sonja Boatman , Julia Kohn , Sarah L. Mott , Schelomo Marmor , Robert D. Madoff , Wolfgang B. Gaertner , Aasma Shaukat , Genevieve B. Melton , Imran Hassan , Paolo Goffredo
{"title":"侧性在内镜下切除高度发育不良结肠腺瘤中的预后意义","authors":"Sonja Boatman ,&nbsp;Julia Kohn ,&nbsp;Sarah L. Mott ,&nbsp;Schelomo Marmor ,&nbsp;Robert D. Madoff ,&nbsp;Wolfgang B. Gaertner ,&nbsp;Aasma Shaukat ,&nbsp;Genevieve B. Melton ,&nbsp;Imran Hassan ,&nbsp;Paolo Goffredo","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p><span><span>Advanced adenomas (AAs) with high-grade </span>dysplasia (HGD) represent risk factors for metachronous neoplasia, for which guidelines recommend short-interval endoscopic surveillance. Although worse survival of proximal </span>colon cancers has been established, the prognostic impact of laterality for AAs with HGD remains unknown. We hypothesized that proximal HGD would have a worse prognosis than distal lesions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>In this retrospective cohort study<span>, adults with HGD managed with endoscopic polypectomy were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004-2017. Survival probabilities were estimated and plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. </span></span>Cox regression models were used to assess the effect of adenoma laterality on overall survival (OS) while adjusting for patient and disease characteristics. One sample log-rank test was employed to compare the survival of patients with that of the US population.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 3953 patients identified in the database, 29% had proximal lesions, which were more common in elderly, Black, publicly insured, and comorbid patients. Unadjusted 5- and 10-year OS was 81% and 67% for proximal vs 89% and 78% for distal HGD (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). In multivariable analysis, proximal location did not demonstrate significantly worse OS (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.29). When compared with the age- and sex-matched US population, patients with HGD had significantly increased mortality (standardized mortality ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.42-1.68), which was more pronounced for right-sided AAs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with HGD, particularly those with proximal lesions, had lower OS than the US population. Although proximal location was not independently associated with worse survival, OS may not represent the optimal endpoint for AAs given the low cancer incidence and effective treatment for early-stage tumors. Future research should focus on the risk of metachronous neoplasia to determine adequate surveillance protocols.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages 352-360"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prognostic Significance of Laterality in Endoscopically Resected Colonic Adenomas With High-Grade Dysplasia\",\"authors\":\"Sonja Boatman ,&nbsp;Julia Kohn ,&nbsp;Sarah L. Mott ,&nbsp;Schelomo Marmor ,&nbsp;Robert D. Madoff ,&nbsp;Wolfgang B. Gaertner ,&nbsp;Aasma Shaukat ,&nbsp;Genevieve B. Melton ,&nbsp;Imran Hassan ,&nbsp;Paolo Goffredo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tige.2023.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p><span><span>Advanced adenomas (AAs) with high-grade </span>dysplasia (HGD) represent risk factors for metachronous neoplasia, for which guidelines recommend short-interval endoscopic surveillance. Although worse survival of proximal </span>colon cancers has been established, the prognostic impact of laterality for AAs with HGD remains unknown. We hypothesized that proximal HGD would have a worse prognosis than distal lesions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>In this retrospective cohort study<span>, adults with HGD managed with endoscopic polypectomy were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004-2017. Survival probabilities were estimated and plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. </span></span>Cox regression models were used to assess the effect of adenoma laterality on overall survival (OS) while adjusting for patient and disease characteristics. One sample log-rank test was employed to compare the survival of patients with that of the US population.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 3953 patients identified in the database, 29% had proximal lesions, which were more common in elderly, Black, publicly insured, and comorbid patients. Unadjusted 5- and 10-year OS was 81% and 67% for proximal vs 89% and 78% for distal HGD (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). In multivariable analysis, proximal location did not demonstrate significantly worse OS (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.29). When compared with the age- and sex-matched US population, patients with HGD had significantly increased mortality (standardized mortality ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.42-1.68), which was more pronounced for right-sided AAs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with HGD, particularly those with proximal lesions, had lower OS than the US population. Although proximal location was not independently associated with worse survival, OS may not represent the optimal endpoint for AAs given the low cancer incidence and effective treatment for early-stage tumors. Future research should focus on the risk of metachronous neoplasia to determine adequate surveillance protocols.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 352-360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030723000570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030723000570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的伴有高度发育不良(HGD)的晚期腺瘤(AAs)是异时性肿瘤的危险因素,指南建议对其进行短期内镜监测。尽管近端结肠癌的生存率较低,但HGD AAs的偏侧性对预后的影响仍然未知。我们假设近端HGD的预后比远端病变差。方法在这项回顾性队列研究中,从2004年至2017年,在国家癌症数据库中确定了接受内镜下息肉切除术的成人HGD患者。使用Kaplan-Meier方法对生存概率进行估计和绘制。Cox回归模型用于评估腺瘤偏侧性对总生存率(OS)的影响,同时根据患者和疾病特征进行调整。采用一个样本对数秩检验来比较患者与美国人群的生存率。结果在数据库中确定的3953名患者中,29%的患者有近端病变,这在老年人、黑人、公共保险和合并症患者中更常见。未经调整的5年和10年OS近端为81%和67%,远端HGD为89%和78%(P<;0.01)。在多变量分析中,近端位置没有显示出明显更差的OS(危险比1.09,95%置信区间[CI]0.92-1.29)。与年龄和性别匹配的美国人群相比,HGD患者的死亡率显著增加(标准化死亡率1.54,95%CI 1.42-1.68),这在右侧AAs中更为明显。结论HGD患者,尤其是近端病变患者,OS低于美国人群。尽管近端位置与较差的生存率无关,但考虑到癌症发病率低和早期肿瘤的有效治疗,OS可能不是AAs的最佳终点。未来的研究应该关注异时性肿瘤的风险,以确定适当的监测方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Prognostic Significance of Laterality in Endoscopically Resected Colonic Adenomas With High-Grade Dysplasia

Background and Aims

Advanced adenomas (AAs) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) represent risk factors for metachronous neoplasia, for which guidelines recommend short-interval endoscopic surveillance. Although worse survival of proximal colon cancers has been established, the prognostic impact of laterality for AAs with HGD remains unknown. We hypothesized that proximal HGD would have a worse prognosis than distal lesions.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, adults with HGD managed with endoscopic polypectomy were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004-2017. Survival probabilities were estimated and plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression models were used to assess the effect of adenoma laterality on overall survival (OS) while adjusting for patient and disease characteristics. One sample log-rank test was employed to compare the survival of patients with that of the US population.

Results

Of 3953 patients identified in the database, 29% had proximal lesions, which were more common in elderly, Black, publicly insured, and comorbid patients. Unadjusted 5- and 10-year OS was 81% and 67% for proximal vs 89% and 78% for distal HGD (P < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, proximal location did not demonstrate significantly worse OS (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.29). When compared with the age- and sex-matched US population, patients with HGD had significantly increased mortality (standardized mortality ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.42-1.68), which was more pronounced for right-sided AAs.

Conclusion

Patients with HGD, particularly those with proximal lesions, had lower OS than the US population. Although proximal location was not independently associated with worse survival, OS may not represent the optimal endpoint for AAs given the low cancer incidence and effective treatment for early-stage tumors. Future research should focus on the risk of metachronous neoplasia to determine adequate surveillance protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Repair for Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks Is Associated With a High Rate of Leak Resolution The Endoscopic Role and Indications of Through-the-Scope Tack and Suture System for Gastrointestinal Closure Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage With 2 Stents Versus 1 Stent Reduces Reinterventions: A Multicenter Study Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1