重症急性胰腺炎早期肠内喂养:胃与空肠远端喂养的随机临床试验

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tige.2023.06.002
Stephen J.D. O'Keefe , Toby Graham , Gregory A. Coté , David C. Whitcomb , Anna Evans , Devavrata Soni , (Study of Nutrition in Acute Pancreatitis) Consortium
{"title":"重症急性胰腺炎早期肠内喂养:胃与空肠远端喂养的随机临床试验","authors":"Stephen J.D. O'Keefe ,&nbsp;Toby Graham ,&nbsp;Gregory A. Coté ,&nbsp;David C. Whitcomb ,&nbsp;Anna Evans ,&nbsp;Devavrata Soni ,&nbsp;(Study of Nutrition in Acute Pancreatitis) Consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2023.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Severe acute pancreatitis is one of the most catabolic illnesses. Meta-analyses have shown that enteral nutrition<span> is safer and more effective than parenteral nutrition in suppressing these losses. However, there is intense debate about how the enteral nutrition should be delivered.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>The design was a randomized controlled trial<span> of early nasogastric (NG) vs distal jejunal (DJ) tube feeding with a semi-elemental diet during the first 4 weeks of severe acute pancreatitis. The setting involved multiple national tertiary care centers. Two hundred and twenty-eight patients were screened, and 26 met the inclusion criteria for new onset severe acute pancreatitis based on an APACHE II score &gt;8, computed tomography evidence of &gt;30% necrosis or computed tomography score &gt;8, and/or a Marshall score &gt;2. The intervention was a randomized allocation to either feeding tube bedside placement by NG or transnasal </span></span>endoscopy for DJ. The primary endpoint was “feeding failure” to tolerate a rate of &gt;10% of the goal for a 48-hour period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six eligible patients were randomized, 12 to NG and 14 to DJ, 20 of 26 from the Pittsburgh center. Most were obese (BMI 31.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Feeding failure occurred in 0 of 14 in the DJ group and in 6 of 11 (55%) in the NG group (<em>P</em> = 0.0026). NG failures were crossed over to DJ feeding with good tolerance and eventual recovery. As a result, the quantity of feed delivered was significantly higher in the DJ group (<em>P</em><span> &lt; 0.05). Serious adverse events (cardiorespiratory arrests, unrelated to endoscopy) occurred in 2 of the DJ and none of the NG group; 3 patients from the DJ group died of progressive organ failure, 2 with associated compartment syndrome.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This randomized controlled trial indicates that in patients<span> with acute pancreatitis of this level of severity, NG feeding will be ineffective. Although this is a common indication for parenteral nutrition, a safer alternative would be endoscopic-assisted DJ feeding tube placement to bypass the usually dysfunctional or obstructed upper gastrointestinal tract.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Enteral Feeding in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial Between Gastric vs Distal Jejunal Feeding\",\"authors\":\"Stephen J.D. O'Keefe ,&nbsp;Toby Graham ,&nbsp;Gregory A. Coté ,&nbsp;David C. Whitcomb ,&nbsp;Anna Evans ,&nbsp;Devavrata Soni ,&nbsp;(Study of Nutrition in Acute Pancreatitis) Consortium\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tige.2023.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Severe acute pancreatitis is one of the most catabolic illnesses. Meta-analyses have shown that enteral nutrition<span> is safer and more effective than parenteral nutrition in suppressing these losses. However, there is intense debate about how the enteral nutrition should be delivered.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>The design was a randomized controlled trial<span> of early nasogastric (NG) vs distal jejunal (DJ) tube feeding with a semi-elemental diet during the first 4 weeks of severe acute pancreatitis. The setting involved multiple national tertiary care centers. Two hundred and twenty-eight patients were screened, and 26 met the inclusion criteria for new onset severe acute pancreatitis based on an APACHE II score &gt;8, computed tomography evidence of &gt;30% necrosis or computed tomography score &gt;8, and/or a Marshall score &gt;2. The intervention was a randomized allocation to either feeding tube bedside placement by NG or transnasal </span></span>endoscopy for DJ. The primary endpoint was “feeding failure” to tolerate a rate of &gt;10% of the goal for a 48-hour period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six eligible patients were randomized, 12 to NG and 14 to DJ, 20 of 26 from the Pittsburgh center. Most were obese (BMI 31.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Feeding failure occurred in 0 of 14 in the DJ group and in 6 of 11 (55%) in the NG group (<em>P</em> = 0.0026). NG failures were crossed over to DJ feeding with good tolerance and eventual recovery. As a result, the quantity of feed delivered was significantly higher in the DJ group (<em>P</em><span> &lt; 0.05). Serious adverse events (cardiorespiratory arrests, unrelated to endoscopy) occurred in 2 of the DJ and none of the NG group; 3 patients from the DJ group died of progressive organ failure, 2 with associated compartment syndrome.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This randomized controlled trial indicates that in patients<span> with acute pancreatitis of this level of severity, NG feeding will be ineffective. Although this is a common indication for parenteral nutrition, a safer alternative would be endoscopic-assisted DJ feeding tube placement to bypass the usually dysfunctional or obstructed upper gastrointestinal tract.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030723000466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030723000466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的严重急性胰腺炎是分解代谢最严重的疾病之一。荟萃分析表明,肠内营养在抑制这些损失方面比肠外营养更安全、更有效。然而,关于肠内营养应该如何提供,存在着激烈的争论。方法在重症急性胰腺炎的前4周,采用半元素饮食进行早期鼻胃(NG)管饲与远端空肠(DJ)管饲的随机对照试验。该环境涉及多个国家三级护理中心。筛选了228名患者,其中26名符合基于APACHE II评分>;8、>;30%坏死或计算机断层扫描评分>;8和/或马歇尔分数>;2.干预措施是随机分配到NG或DJ经鼻内镜下放置饲管的床边。主要终点是“喂养失败”,耐受率>;在48小时内达到目标的10%。结果26例符合条件的患者随机分为12例NG和14例DJ,其中20例来自匹兹堡中心。大多数是肥胖(BMI 31.5kg/m2)。DJ组14例中有0例发生喂养失败,NG组11例中有6例(55%)发生喂养失败(P=0.0026)。NG失败与DJ喂养交叉,耐受性良好,最终恢复。结果,DJ组的饲料输送量显著增加(P<;0.05)。DJ组中有2例发生严重不良事件(心肺骤停,与内窥镜检查无关),NG组中没有一例发生;DJ组3例死于进行性器官衰竭,2例伴有相关隔室综合征。结论本随机对照试验表明,在这种严重程度的急性胰腺炎患者中,NG喂养是无效的。尽管这是肠外营养的常见适应症,但更安全的替代方案是内镜辅助DJ饲管放置,以绕过通常功能失调或阻塞的上消化道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early Enteral Feeding in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial Between Gastric vs Distal Jejunal Feeding

Background and Aims

Severe acute pancreatitis is one of the most catabolic illnesses. Meta-analyses have shown that enteral nutrition is safer and more effective than parenteral nutrition in suppressing these losses. However, there is intense debate about how the enteral nutrition should be delivered.

Methods

The design was a randomized controlled trial of early nasogastric (NG) vs distal jejunal (DJ) tube feeding with a semi-elemental diet during the first 4 weeks of severe acute pancreatitis. The setting involved multiple national tertiary care centers. Two hundred and twenty-eight patients were screened, and 26 met the inclusion criteria for new onset severe acute pancreatitis based on an APACHE II score >8, computed tomography evidence of >30% necrosis or computed tomography score >8, and/or a Marshall score >2. The intervention was a randomized allocation to either feeding tube bedside placement by NG or transnasal endoscopy for DJ. The primary endpoint was “feeding failure” to tolerate a rate of >10% of the goal for a 48-hour period.

Results

Twenty-six eligible patients were randomized, 12 to NG and 14 to DJ, 20 of 26 from the Pittsburgh center. Most were obese (BMI 31.5 kg/m2). Feeding failure occurred in 0 of 14 in the DJ group and in 6 of 11 (55%) in the NG group (P = 0.0026). NG failures were crossed over to DJ feeding with good tolerance and eventual recovery. As a result, the quantity of feed delivered was significantly higher in the DJ group (P < 0.05). Serious adverse events (cardiorespiratory arrests, unrelated to endoscopy) occurred in 2 of the DJ and none of the NG group; 3 patients from the DJ group died of progressive organ failure, 2 with associated compartment syndrome.

Conclusion

This randomized controlled trial indicates that in patients with acute pancreatitis of this level of severity, NG feeding will be ineffective. Although this is a common indication for parenteral nutrition, a safer alternative would be endoscopic-assisted DJ feeding tube placement to bypass the usually dysfunctional or obstructed upper gastrointestinal tract.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Editorial Board Table of Contents Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1