Daniyal Abbas , Mohamed Abdallah , Khalid Ahmed , Abubaker O. Abdalla , Nicholas McDonald , Shifa Umar , Brian J. Hanson , Mohammad Bilal
{"title":"超镜夹相关不良事件报告分析:MAUDE数据库分析","authors":"Daniyal Abbas , Mohamed Abdallah , Khalid Ahmed , Abubaker O. Abdalla , Nicholas McDonald , Shifa Umar , Brian J. Hanson , Mohammad Bilal","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2022.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) have been increasingly used in the management of bleeding, perforations, fistulae<span><span>, and anastomotic leaks in the </span>gastrointestinal tract. However, since their Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2010, data on the adverse events of OTSC systems have been lacking. The aim of our study was to report and analyze adverse events and device failures associated with OTSC systems using the FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed the FDA MAUDE database post-marketing surveillance data from January 2013 through May 2022 on the two OTSC systems available in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty medical device reporting claims were found from January 2013 through May 2022. Adverse events were classified as device-related problems and patient-related adverse events. Forty device-related problems were reported, along with 20 device-related adverse events. Most device-related problems were reported in the Padlock defect closure system (n = 23), followed by the Padlock pro clip system (n = 8) and Ovesco OTSC system (n = 9). The most common device-related problem was related to the failure of OTSC deployment (n = 13), followed by material protrusion or extrusion (n = 7). The most common patient adverse events were perforation (n = 4), esophageal laceration (n = 4), bleeding (n = 3), and luminal stenosis (n = 3). All 4 patients required surgical management of the perforation. No deaths related to the use of OTSCs were reported.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Failure of OTSC deployment and perforation were the most common device-related problem and patient-related adverse event, respectively. As the use of OTSC systems continues to increase, it is important for endoscopists to be mindful of both the common and rare adverse events associated with OTSC use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 106-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Reported Adverse Events Related to Over-the-Scope Clips: A MAUDE Database Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Daniyal Abbas , Mohamed Abdallah , Khalid Ahmed , Abubaker O. Abdalla , Nicholas McDonald , Shifa Umar , Brian J. Hanson , Mohammad Bilal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tige.2022.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) have been increasingly used in the management of bleeding, perforations, fistulae<span><span>, and anastomotic leaks in the </span>gastrointestinal tract. However, since their Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2010, data on the adverse events of OTSC systems have been lacking. The aim of our study was to report and analyze adverse events and device failures associated with OTSC systems using the FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed the FDA MAUDE database post-marketing surveillance data from January 2013 through May 2022 on the two OTSC systems available in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty medical device reporting claims were found from January 2013 through May 2022. Adverse events were classified as device-related problems and patient-related adverse events. Forty device-related problems were reported, along with 20 device-related adverse events. Most device-related problems were reported in the Padlock defect closure system (n = 23), followed by the Padlock pro clip system (n = 8) and Ovesco OTSC system (n = 9). The most common device-related problem was related to the failure of OTSC deployment (n = 13), followed by material protrusion or extrusion (n = 7). The most common patient adverse events were perforation (n = 4), esophageal laceration (n = 4), bleeding (n = 3), and luminal stenosis (n = 3). All 4 patients required surgical management of the perforation. No deaths related to the use of OTSCs were reported.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Failure of OTSC deployment and perforation were the most common device-related problem and patient-related adverse event, respectively. As the use of OTSC systems continues to increase, it is important for endoscopists to be mindful of both the common and rare adverse events associated with OTSC use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 106-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030722000873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030722000873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的内镜下夹(OTSCs)已越来越多地用于治疗胃肠道出血、穿孔、瘘管和吻合口瘘。然而,自2010年美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准以来,一直缺乏关于OTSC系统不良事件的数据。我们研究的目的是使用美国食品药品监督管理局的制造商和用户设备体验(MAUDE)数据库报告和分析与OTSC系统相关的不良事件和设备故障。方法我们分析了2013年1月至2022年5月美国食品药品监督管理局MAUDE数据库关于美国两个OTSC系统的上市后监测数据。不良事件分为器械相关问题和患者相关不良事件。报告了40个器械相关问题,以及20个器械相关不良事件。大多数与设备相关的问题报告在Padlock缺陷闭合系统(n=23)中,其次是Padlock pro clip系统(n=8)和Ovesco OTSC系统(n=9)。最常见的设备相关问题与OTSC部署失败有关(n=13),其次是材料突出或挤压(n=7)。最常见的患者不良事件是穿孔(n=4)、食道撕裂伤(n=4,出血(n=3)和管腔狭窄(n=3,)。所有4名患者都需要对穿孔进行手术治疗。没有与OTSC使用相关的死亡报告。结论OTSC部署失败和穿孔分别是最常见的器械相关问题和患者相关不良事件。随着OTSC系统的使用不断增加,内镜医生必须注意与OTSC使用相关的常见和罕见不良事件。
Analysis of Reported Adverse Events Related to Over-the-Scope Clips: A MAUDE Database Analysis
Background and Aims
Over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) have been increasingly used in the management of bleeding, perforations, fistulae, and anastomotic leaks in the gastrointestinal tract. However, since their Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2010, data on the adverse events of OTSC systems have been lacking. The aim of our study was to report and analyze adverse events and device failures associated with OTSC systems using the FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.
Methods
We analyzed the FDA MAUDE database post-marketing surveillance data from January 2013 through May 2022 on the two OTSC systems available in the United States.
Results
Forty medical device reporting claims were found from January 2013 through May 2022. Adverse events were classified as device-related problems and patient-related adverse events. Forty device-related problems were reported, along with 20 device-related adverse events. Most device-related problems were reported in the Padlock defect closure system (n = 23), followed by the Padlock pro clip system (n = 8) and Ovesco OTSC system (n = 9). The most common device-related problem was related to the failure of OTSC deployment (n = 13), followed by material protrusion or extrusion (n = 7). The most common patient adverse events were perforation (n = 4), esophageal laceration (n = 4), bleeding (n = 3), and luminal stenosis (n = 3). All 4 patients required surgical management of the perforation. No deaths related to the use of OTSCs were reported.
Conclusion
Failure of OTSC deployment and perforation were the most common device-related problem and patient-related adverse event, respectively. As the use of OTSC systems continues to increase, it is important for endoscopists to be mindful of both the common and rare adverse events associated with OTSC use.