金银花与山阴花九种抗炎成分在对二甲苯致小鼠耳部水肿中的多药动学比较

Q3 Medicine Digital Chinese Medicine Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dcmed.2023.02.009
L.I. Haiying , X.I.A.O. Meifeng , P.A.N. Xue , L.I. Wenjiao , Z.H.O.U. Yiqun , L.I.U. Wenlong , H.E. Fuyuan
{"title":"金银花与山阴花九种抗炎成分在对二甲苯致小鼠耳部水肿中的多药动学比较","authors":"L.I. Haiying ,&nbsp;X.I.A.O. Meifeng ,&nbsp;P.A.N. Xue ,&nbsp;L.I. Wenjiao ,&nbsp;Z.H.O.U. Yiqun ,&nbsp;L.I.U. Wenlong ,&nbsp;H.E. Fuyuan","doi":"10.1016/j.dcmed.2023.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To reveal the integral <em>in vivo</em> polypharmacokinetics (PPK) similarity or difference between Jinyinhua (Lonicerae Japonicae Flos, LJF) and Shanyinhua (Lonicerae Flos, LF), and provide reference for their clinical application.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PPK model and its total quantum statistical moment similarity (TQSMS) method were used to compare the integral PPK profiles of nine components with anti-inflammatory efficacy (rutin, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, cryptochlorogenic acid, dispsacoside B, macranthoidin B, isochlorogenic acid A, isochlorogenic acid B, and isochlorogenic acid C) of LJF and LF. A total of 54 Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) grade Kunming (KM) mice were randomized into LJF group and LF group (<em>n</em> = 27), and each group was divided into nine subgroups (<em>n</em> = 3) according to different time points. Subsequently, mice model of p-xylene-induced ear edema was constructed by oral administration of LJF and LF. The concentrations of the nine anti-inflammatory components in plasma samples of the mice were determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS). And the pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters of single component and the integral PPK parameters [total quantum statistical moment (TQSM) and TQSMS] of multiple components were calculated by Drug And Statistics (DAS) software and home-brew programs with Excel, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were significant differences in single-component PK parameters between LJF and LF (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Whereas, no significant differences were found in multi-component TQSM parameters, including total quantum zero moment (<em>AUC</em><sub><em>T</em>0<em>-t</em></sub>, <em>AUC</em><sub><em>T</em>0<em>-∞</em></sub>) and total quantum first moment (<em>MRT</em><sub><em>T</em>0<em>-t</em></sub>, <em>MRT</em><sub><em>T</em>0<em>-∞</em></sub>) for the total quanta (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Accordingly, single-component TQSMS varied from 0.220 4 to 0.968 9, and that for the total quanta was 0.828 4, suggesting no significant differences in the speed and extent of bioavailability between LJF and LF. Furthermore, in light of high TQSMS (0.828 4), the integral PPK profiles of the nine anti-inflammatory components of LJF and LF were similar under 90% confidence intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The PPK model and its TQSMS method are appropriate and efficient to compare the similarity or difference of integral PPK profiles of multi-component herbal medicines. It is suggested in this research that LJF can be replaced with LF or vice versa for anti-inflammatory treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33578,"journal":{"name":"Digital Chinese Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 73-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative polypharmacokinetics of nine anti-inflammatory components of Jinyinhua (Lonicerae Japonicae Flos) and Shanyinhua (Lonicerae Flos) in mice with p-xylene-induced ear edema\",\"authors\":\"L.I. Haiying ,&nbsp;X.I.A.O. Meifeng ,&nbsp;P.A.N. Xue ,&nbsp;L.I. Wenjiao ,&nbsp;Z.H.O.U. Yiqun ,&nbsp;L.I.U. Wenlong ,&nbsp;H.E. Fuyuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dcmed.2023.02.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To reveal the integral <em>in vivo</em> polypharmacokinetics (PPK) similarity or difference between Jinyinhua (Lonicerae Japonicae Flos, LJF) and Shanyinhua (Lonicerae Flos, LF), and provide reference for their clinical application.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PPK model and its total quantum statistical moment similarity (TQSMS) method were used to compare the integral PPK profiles of nine components with anti-inflammatory efficacy (rutin, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, cryptochlorogenic acid, dispsacoside B, macranthoidin B, isochlorogenic acid A, isochlorogenic acid B, and isochlorogenic acid C) of LJF and LF. A total of 54 Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) grade Kunming (KM) mice were randomized into LJF group and LF group (<em>n</em> = 27), and each group was divided into nine subgroups (<em>n</em> = 3) according to different time points. Subsequently, mice model of p-xylene-induced ear edema was constructed by oral administration of LJF and LF. The concentrations of the nine anti-inflammatory components in plasma samples of the mice were determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS). And the pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters of single component and the integral PPK parameters [total quantum statistical moment (TQSM) and TQSMS] of multiple components were calculated by Drug And Statistics (DAS) software and home-brew programs with Excel, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were significant differences in single-component PK parameters between LJF and LF (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Whereas, no significant differences were found in multi-component TQSM parameters, including total quantum zero moment (<em>AUC</em><sub><em>T</em>0<em>-t</em></sub>, <em>AUC</em><sub><em>T</em>0<em>-∞</em></sub>) and total quantum first moment (<em>MRT</em><sub><em>T</em>0<em>-t</em></sub>, <em>MRT</em><sub><em>T</em>0<em>-∞</em></sub>) for the total quanta (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Accordingly, single-component TQSMS varied from 0.220 4 to 0.968 9, and that for the total quanta was 0.828 4, suggesting no significant differences in the speed and extent of bioavailability between LJF and LF. Furthermore, in light of high TQSMS (0.828 4), the integral PPK profiles of the nine anti-inflammatory components of LJF and LF were similar under 90% confidence intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The PPK model and its TQSMS method are appropriate and efficient to compare the similarity or difference of integral PPK profiles of multi-component herbal medicines. It is suggested in this research that LJF can be replaced with LF or vice versa for anti-inflammatory treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Chinese Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 73-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Chinese Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589377723000216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Chinese Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589377723000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的揭示金银花与山银花在体内多药动力学(PPK)的相似性或差异性,为其临床应用提供参考。方法采用PPK模型及其总量子统计矩相似性(TQSMS)方法,比较了具有抗炎作用的9种组分(芦丁、咖啡酸、绿原酸、隐绿原酸、积雪草苷B、大白菜素B、异绿原酸A、异氯酸B和异绿原酸C)的PPK积分图谱。将54只SPF级昆明小鼠随机分为LJF组和LF组(n=27),每组按不同时间点分为9个亚组(n=3)。随后,通过口服LJF和LF构建对二甲苯诱导的耳水肿小鼠模型。通过超高效液相色谱/四极杆飞行时间质谱法(UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS)测定小鼠血浆样品中9种抗炎成分的浓度。分别用Drug And Statistics(DAS)软件和Excel自制程序计算单组分的药代动力学(PK)参数和多组分的积分PPK参数[总量子统计矩(TQSM)和TQSMS]。结果LJF和LF的单组分PK参数存在显著差异(P<;0.05)。而多组分TQSM参数,包括总量子零矩(AUCT0-t,AUCT0-∞)和总量子一阶矩(MRTT0-t,MRTT0-∞),均无显著差异(P>;0.05),单组分TQSMS在0.220 4至0.968 9之间变化,总量子的TQSMS为0.828 4,表明LJF和LF在生物利用度的速度和程度上没有显著差异。此外,鉴于高TQSMS(0.828 4),在90%置信区间下,LJF和LF的九种抗炎成分的积分PPK谱相似。结论PPK模型及其TQSMS方法是比较多组分中药整体PPK图谱相似性或差异性的合适而有效的方法。本研究表明,LJF可以用LF代替,反之亦然,用于抗炎治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative polypharmacokinetics of nine anti-inflammatory components of Jinyinhua (Lonicerae Japonicae Flos) and Shanyinhua (Lonicerae Flos) in mice with p-xylene-induced ear edema

Objective

To reveal the integral in vivo polypharmacokinetics (PPK) similarity or difference between Jinyinhua (Lonicerae Japonicae Flos, LJF) and Shanyinhua (Lonicerae Flos, LF), and provide reference for their clinical application.

Methods

The PPK model and its total quantum statistical moment similarity (TQSMS) method were used to compare the integral PPK profiles of nine components with anti-inflammatory efficacy (rutin, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, cryptochlorogenic acid, dispsacoside B, macranthoidin B, isochlorogenic acid A, isochlorogenic acid B, and isochlorogenic acid C) of LJF and LF. A total of 54 Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) grade Kunming (KM) mice were randomized into LJF group and LF group (n = 27), and each group was divided into nine subgroups (n = 3) according to different time points. Subsequently, mice model of p-xylene-induced ear edema was constructed by oral administration of LJF and LF. The concentrations of the nine anti-inflammatory components in plasma samples of the mice were determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS). And the pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters of single component and the integral PPK parameters [total quantum statistical moment (TQSM) and TQSMS] of multiple components were calculated by Drug And Statistics (DAS) software and home-brew programs with Excel, respectively.

Results

There were significant differences in single-component PK parameters between LJF and LF (P < 0.05). Whereas, no significant differences were found in multi-component TQSM parameters, including total quantum zero moment (AUCT0-t, AUCT0-∞) and total quantum first moment (MRTT0-t, MRTT0-∞) for the total quanta (P > 0.05). Accordingly, single-component TQSMS varied from 0.220 4 to 0.968 9, and that for the total quanta was 0.828 4, suggesting no significant differences in the speed and extent of bioavailability between LJF and LF. Furthermore, in light of high TQSMS (0.828 4), the integral PPK profiles of the nine anti-inflammatory components of LJF and LF were similar under 90% confidence intervals.

Conclusion

The PPK model and its TQSMS method are appropriate and efficient to compare the similarity or difference of integral PPK profiles of multi-component herbal medicines. It is suggested in this research that LJF can be replaced with LF or vice versa for anti-inflammatory treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Chinese Medicine
Digital Chinese Medicine Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
A novel method for integrating chromatographic fingerprint analytical units of Chinese materia medica: the matching frequency statistical moment method Analysis on pulse features of coronary heart disease patients with or without a history of ischemic stroke Metabolic characteristics of Qi-Yin deficiency and heat stagnation in liver meridian patterns of dry eye based on tear metabolomics The gas discharge visualization (GDV) order parameter model based on the principle of mastering both permanence and change Modulation of synaptic damage by Bushen Tiansui Decoction via the PI3K signaling pathway in an Alzheimer’s disease model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1