大脑应变率响应:解决模型验证的计算模糊性和实验数据

Q3 Engineering Brain multiphysics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.brain.2023.100073
Zhou Zhou , Xiaogai Li , Yuzhe Liu , Warren N. Hardy , Svein Kleiven
{"title":"大脑应变率响应:解决模型验证的计算模糊性和实验数据","authors":"Zhou Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaogai Li ,&nbsp;Yuzhe Liu ,&nbsp;Warren N. Hardy ,&nbsp;Svein Kleiven","doi":"10.1016/j.brain.2023.100073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an alarming global public health issue with high morbidity and mortality rates. Although the causal link between external insults and consequent brain injury remains largely elusive, both strain and strain rate are generally recognized as crucial factors for TBI onsets. With respect to the flourishment of strain-based investigation, ambiguity and inconsistency are noted in the scheme for strain rate calculation within the TBI research community. Furthermore, there is no experimental data that can be used to validate the strain rate responses of finite element (FE) models of the human brain. The current work presented a theoretical clarification of two commonly used strain rate computational schemes: the strain rate was either calculated as the time derivative of strain or derived from the rate of deformation tensor. To further substantiate the theoretical disparity, these two schemes were respectively implemented to estimate the strain rate responses from a previous-published cadaveric experiment and an FE head model secondary to a concussive impact. The results clearly showed scheme-dependent responses, both in the experimentally determined principal strain rate and model-derived principal and tract-oriented strain rates. The results highlight that cross-scheme comparison of strain rate responses is inappropriate, and the utilized strain rate computational scheme needs to be reported in future studies. The newly calculated experimental strain rate curves in the supplementary material can be used for strain rate validation of FE head models.</p></div><div><h3>Statement of significance</h3><p></p><ul><li><span>–</span><span><p>Delineates a theoretical clarification of two algorithms for strain rate computation.</p></span></li><li><span>–</span><span><p>Highlights the strain rate responses directly depends on the computational schemes.</p></span></li><li><span>–</span><span><p>Presents experimental strain rate curves, serving as references for strain rate validation of finite element head models.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":72449,"journal":{"name":"Brain multiphysics","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100073"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain strain rate response: Addressing computational ambiguity and experimental data for model validation\",\"authors\":\"Zhou Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaogai Li ,&nbsp;Yuzhe Liu ,&nbsp;Warren N. Hardy ,&nbsp;Svein Kleiven\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brain.2023.100073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an alarming global public health issue with high morbidity and mortality rates. Although the causal link between external insults and consequent brain injury remains largely elusive, both strain and strain rate are generally recognized as crucial factors for TBI onsets. With respect to the flourishment of strain-based investigation, ambiguity and inconsistency are noted in the scheme for strain rate calculation within the TBI research community. Furthermore, there is no experimental data that can be used to validate the strain rate responses of finite element (FE) models of the human brain. The current work presented a theoretical clarification of two commonly used strain rate computational schemes: the strain rate was either calculated as the time derivative of strain or derived from the rate of deformation tensor. To further substantiate the theoretical disparity, these two schemes were respectively implemented to estimate the strain rate responses from a previous-published cadaveric experiment and an FE head model secondary to a concussive impact. The results clearly showed scheme-dependent responses, both in the experimentally determined principal strain rate and model-derived principal and tract-oriented strain rates. The results highlight that cross-scheme comparison of strain rate responses is inappropriate, and the utilized strain rate computational scheme needs to be reported in future studies. The newly calculated experimental strain rate curves in the supplementary material can be used for strain rate validation of FE head models.</p></div><div><h3>Statement of significance</h3><p></p><ul><li><span>–</span><span><p>Delineates a theoretical clarification of two algorithms for strain rate computation.</p></span></li><li><span>–</span><span><p>Highlights the strain rate responses directly depends on the computational schemes.</p></span></li><li><span>–</span><span><p>Presents experimental strain rate curves, serving as references for strain rate validation of finite element head models.</p></span></li></ul></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain multiphysics\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain multiphysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666522023000114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain multiphysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666522023000114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是一个令人担忧的全球公共卫生问题,发病率和死亡率都很高。尽管外部损伤和随后的脑损伤之间的因果关系在很大程度上仍然难以捉摸,但应变和应变率通常被认为是TBI发作的关键因素。随着基于应变的研究的蓬勃发展,TBI研究界的应变速率计算方案存在歧义和不一致性。此外,没有实验数据可以用来验证人脑有限元(FE)模型的应变速率响应。目前的工作对两种常用的应变速率计算方案进行了理论澄清:应变速率要么计算为应变的时间导数,要么从变形率张量导出。为了进一步证实理论上的差异,这两种方案分别用于估计先前发表的尸体实验和冲击后的有限元头部模型的应变速率响应。结果清楚地显示了在实验确定的主应变速率和模型推导的主应变率和束取向应变速率中的方案依赖性响应。结果强调,应变速率响应的跨方案比较是不合适的,所使用的应变速率计算方案需要在未来的研究中报告。补充材料中新计算的实验应变速率曲线可用于有限元头部模型的应变速率验证。重要声明——对应变率计算的两种算法进行了理论澄清强调应变速率响应直接取决于计算方案给出了试验应变速率曲线,为有限元封头模型的应变速率验证提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brain strain rate response: Addressing computational ambiguity and experimental data for model validation

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an alarming global public health issue with high morbidity and mortality rates. Although the causal link between external insults and consequent brain injury remains largely elusive, both strain and strain rate are generally recognized as crucial factors for TBI onsets. With respect to the flourishment of strain-based investigation, ambiguity and inconsistency are noted in the scheme for strain rate calculation within the TBI research community. Furthermore, there is no experimental data that can be used to validate the strain rate responses of finite element (FE) models of the human brain. The current work presented a theoretical clarification of two commonly used strain rate computational schemes: the strain rate was either calculated as the time derivative of strain or derived from the rate of deformation tensor. To further substantiate the theoretical disparity, these two schemes were respectively implemented to estimate the strain rate responses from a previous-published cadaveric experiment and an FE head model secondary to a concussive impact. The results clearly showed scheme-dependent responses, both in the experimentally determined principal strain rate and model-derived principal and tract-oriented strain rates. The results highlight that cross-scheme comparison of strain rate responses is inappropriate, and the utilized strain rate computational scheme needs to be reported in future studies. The newly calculated experimental strain rate curves in the supplementary material can be used for strain rate validation of FE head models.

Statement of significance

  • Delineates a theoretical clarification of two algorithms for strain rate computation.

  • Highlights the strain rate responses directly depends on the computational schemes.

  • Presents experimental strain rate curves, serving as references for strain rate validation of finite element head models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain multiphysics
Brain multiphysics Physics and Astronomy (General), Modelling and Simulation, Neuroscience (General), Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
期刊最新文献
Diffusive secondary injuries in neuronal networks following a blast impact: A morphological and electrophysiological study using a TBI-on-a-Chip model Two for tau: Automated model discovery reveals two-stage tau aggregation dynamics in Alzheimer’s disease Scaling in the brain Quantifying CSF Dynamics disruption in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus using phase lag between transmantle pressure and volumetric flow rate Increased hindbrain motion in Chiari I malformation patients measured through 3D amplified MRI (3D aMRI)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1