用于估计主动脉缩窄压力梯度的狭窄模型的比较

IF 1.8 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Journal of Biological Physics Pub Date : 2021-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s10867-021-09572-x
Yubing Shi, Israel Valverde, Patricia V. Lawford, Heynric B. Grotenhuis, Philipp Beerbaum, D. Rodney Hose
{"title":"用于估计主动脉缩窄压力梯度的狭窄模型的比较","authors":"Yubing Shi,&nbsp;Israel Valverde,&nbsp;Patricia V. Lawford,&nbsp;Heynric B. Grotenhuis,&nbsp;Philipp Beerbaum,&nbsp;D. Rodney Hose","doi":"10.1007/s10867-021-09572-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Non-invasive estimation of the pressure gradient in cardiovascular stenosis has much clinical importance in assisting the diagnosis and treatment of stenotic diseases. In this research, a systematic comparison is conducted to investigate the accuracy of a group of stenosis models against the MRI- and catheter-measured patient data under the aortic coarctation condition. Eight analytical stenosis models, including six from the literature and two proposed in this study, are investigated to examine their prediction accuracy against the clinical data. The two improved models proposed in this study consider comprehensively the Poiseuille loss, the Bernoulli loss in its exact form, and the entrance effect, of the blood flow. Comparison of the results shows that one of the proposed models demonstrates a cycle-averaged mean prediction error of −0.15 ± 3.03 mmHg, a peak-to-peak prediction error of −1.8 ± 6.89 mmHg, which is the best among the models studied.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biological Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10867-021-09572-x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of stenosis models for usage in the estimation of pressure gradient across aortic coarctation\",\"authors\":\"Yubing Shi,&nbsp;Israel Valverde,&nbsp;Patricia V. Lawford,&nbsp;Heynric B. Grotenhuis,&nbsp;Philipp Beerbaum,&nbsp;D. Rodney Hose\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10867-021-09572-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Non-invasive estimation of the pressure gradient in cardiovascular stenosis has much clinical importance in assisting the diagnosis and treatment of stenotic diseases. In this research, a systematic comparison is conducted to investigate the accuracy of a group of stenosis models against the MRI- and catheter-measured patient data under the aortic coarctation condition. Eight analytical stenosis models, including six from the literature and two proposed in this study, are investigated to examine their prediction accuracy against the clinical data. The two improved models proposed in this study consider comprehensively the Poiseuille loss, the Bernoulli loss in its exact form, and the entrance effect, of the blood flow. Comparison of the results shows that one of the proposed models demonstrates a cycle-averaged mean prediction error of −0.15 ± 3.03 mmHg, a peak-to-peak prediction error of −1.8 ± 6.89 mmHg, which is the best among the models studied.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biological Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10867-021-09572-x\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biological Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10867-021-09572-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biological Physics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10867-021-09572-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无创评估心血管狭窄的压力梯度对辅助狭窄性疾病的诊断和治疗具有重要的临床意义。在本研究中,我们对主动脉缩窄情况下一组狭窄模型与MRI和导管测量患者数据的准确性进行了系统的比较。研究了8个分析性狭窄模型,其中6个来自文献,2个来自本研究,以检验其对临床数据的预测准确性。本研究提出的两种改进模型综合考虑了泊泽维尔损失、伯努利损失的精确形式以及血流的入口效应。结果表明,其中一个模型的周期平均预测误差为- 0.15±3.03 mmHg,峰间预测误差为- 1.8±6.89 mmHg,是所研究模型中最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of stenosis models for usage in the estimation of pressure gradient across aortic coarctation

Non-invasive estimation of the pressure gradient in cardiovascular stenosis has much clinical importance in assisting the diagnosis and treatment of stenotic diseases. In this research, a systematic comparison is conducted to investigate the accuracy of a group of stenosis models against the MRI- and catheter-measured patient data under the aortic coarctation condition. Eight analytical stenosis models, including six from the literature and two proposed in this study, are investigated to examine their prediction accuracy against the clinical data. The two improved models proposed in this study consider comprehensively the Poiseuille loss, the Bernoulli loss in its exact form, and the entrance effect, of the blood flow. Comparison of the results shows that one of the proposed models demonstrates a cycle-averaged mean prediction error of −0.15 ± 3.03 mmHg, a peak-to-peak prediction error of −1.8 ± 6.89 mmHg, which is the best among the models studied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biological Physics
Journal of Biological Physics 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Many physicists are turning their attention to domains that were not traditionally part of physics and are applying the sophisticated tools of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to investigate biological processes, systems and materials. The Journal of Biological Physics provides a medium where this growing community of scientists can publish its results and discuss its aims and methods. It welcomes papers which use the tools of physics in an innovative way to study biological problems, as well as research aimed at providing a better understanding of the physical principles underlying biological processes.
期刊最新文献
Pseudo-trajectory inference for identifying essential regulations and molecules in cell fate decisions Stochastic model of seed dispersal with homogeneous and non-homogeneous Poisson processes under habitat reduction conditions Exploring the effects of simulated microgravity on esophageal cancer cells: insights into morphological, growth behavior, adhesion, and genetic damage A possible origin of the inverted vertebrate retina revealed by physical modeling Motor domain of condensin and step formation in extruding loop of DNA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1