为受现代奴隶制影响的母亲提供孕产期间的照顾和支持:范围审查

Sara Borrelli , Renuka Ramasamy , Ruth Wong , Helen Spiby
{"title":"为受现代奴隶制影响的母亲提供孕产期间的照顾和支持:范围审查","authors":"Sara Borrelli ,&nbsp;Renuka Ramasamy ,&nbsp;Ruth Wong ,&nbsp;Helen Spiby","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Modern slavery is a largely hidden crime disproportionately affecting women and girls, with 71% of the world's enslaved people being female and approximately one third estimated to be pregnant. Healthcare professionals experience difficulties in caring for mothers affected by modern slavery, including asking appropriate questions and initiating discussions, making safe referrals, being uncertain about entitlements, and facing obstacles in accessing language support and specialist mental health services. Despite the expectation of cohesive and consistent services, which avoid the recounting of experiences that may re-traumatise, interdisciplinary collaborations between maternity services and non-statutory agencies remain unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To map the available evidence and resources on maternity care provision and non-statutory support to pregnant women and mothers affected by modern slavery.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A scoping review was conducted following the JBI methodology for scoping reviews.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five databases (Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Dissertations &amp; Thesis A&amp;I, Embase, Scopus) were searched. Inclusion criteria: English language; published between 2012 and May 2022; related to both maternity care provision and modern slavery; cross-sectional perspectives, including survivor mothers, healthcare professionals, midwives, and non-statutory service staff; any methodology. Exclusion criteria: general healthcare or not maternity related; opinion pieces, letters, book reviews, commentaries. Grey literature was searched using relevant websites reporting theses, blogs, policies, guidelines, and resources.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve articles reporting 11 studies and 29 grey literature reports were retained for the scoping review. Three key themes were identified from research studies: <strong>a)</strong> women's perspectives on barriers to access and engagement with maternity services; <strong>b)</strong> challenges and needs identified by healthcare professionals; and <strong>c)</strong> the impact of human trafficking on maternal and neonatal outcomes. The grey literature resources comprised mainly blogs, information sheets, leaflets or webpages, and research or consultation reports. Maternity was being experienced by survivor mothers with the following: unfamiliarity with and lack of access to systems and information across all sectors, barriers to care and entitlements, contemporary threats of violence from partners/traffickers, restricted ability to move freely, issues related to traumatisation, dispersal policies, and dealing with multiple new systems.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although several sources indicate principles that should be adopted, the detail of <em>how</em> optimal care and support during maternity should be provided by healthcare professionals and non-statutory service staff is lacking. Further research is required, from which recommendations for good maternity practice and the effective intersection between statutory and non-statutory services can be derived and subsequently mobilised across different systems and settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care and support during maternity for mothers affected by modern slavery: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Sara Borrelli ,&nbsp;Renuka Ramasamy ,&nbsp;Ruth Wong ,&nbsp;Helen Spiby\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Modern slavery is a largely hidden crime disproportionately affecting women and girls, with 71% of the world's enslaved people being female and approximately one third estimated to be pregnant. Healthcare professionals experience difficulties in caring for mothers affected by modern slavery, including asking appropriate questions and initiating discussions, making safe referrals, being uncertain about entitlements, and facing obstacles in accessing language support and specialist mental health services. Despite the expectation of cohesive and consistent services, which avoid the recounting of experiences that may re-traumatise, interdisciplinary collaborations between maternity services and non-statutory agencies remain unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To map the available evidence and resources on maternity care provision and non-statutory support to pregnant women and mothers affected by modern slavery.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A scoping review was conducted following the JBI methodology for scoping reviews.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five databases (Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Dissertations &amp; Thesis A&amp;I, Embase, Scopus) were searched. Inclusion criteria: English language; published between 2012 and May 2022; related to both maternity care provision and modern slavery; cross-sectional perspectives, including survivor mothers, healthcare professionals, midwives, and non-statutory service staff; any methodology. Exclusion criteria: general healthcare or not maternity related; opinion pieces, letters, book reviews, commentaries. Grey literature was searched using relevant websites reporting theses, blogs, policies, guidelines, and resources.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve articles reporting 11 studies and 29 grey literature reports were retained for the scoping review. Three key themes were identified from research studies: <strong>a)</strong> women's perspectives on barriers to access and engagement with maternity services; <strong>b)</strong> challenges and needs identified by healthcare professionals; and <strong>c)</strong> the impact of human trafficking on maternal and neonatal outcomes. The grey literature resources comprised mainly blogs, information sheets, leaflets or webpages, and research or consultation reports. Maternity was being experienced by survivor mothers with the following: unfamiliarity with and lack of access to systems and information across all sectors, barriers to care and entitlements, contemporary threats of violence from partners/traffickers, restricted ability to move freely, issues related to traumatisation, dispersal policies, and dealing with multiple new systems.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although several sources indicate principles that should be adopted, the detail of <em>how</em> optimal care and support during maternity should be provided by healthcare professionals and non-statutory service staff is lacking. Further research is required, from which recommendations for good maternity practice and the effective intersection between statutory and non-statutory services can be derived and subsequently mobilised across different systems and settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X23000231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X23000231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代奴隶制在很大程度上是一种隐蔽的犯罪,对妇女和女孩的影响尤为严重,世界上71%的被奴役者是女性,估计约有三分之一的人怀孕。保健专业人员在照顾受现代奴役影响的母亲方面遇到困难,包括提出适当的问题和发起讨论、进行安全转诊、不确定应享权利以及在获得语言支持和专业心理健康服务方面面临障碍。尽管期望提供连贯一致的服务,避免叙述可能再次造成创伤的经历,但产妇服务机构与非法定机构之间的跨学科合作仍然不清楚。目的了解受现代奴隶制影响的孕妇和母亲的产妇护理和非法定支持方面的现有证据和资源。DesignA范围审查是按照JBI的范围审查方法进行的。方法5个数据库(应用社会科学索引;摘要:护理及相关卫生文献、论文及综合索引;检索论文A&I, Embase, Scopus)。入选标准:英语语言;2012年至2022年5月出版;与产妇护理提供和现代奴隶制有关;横断面观点,包括幸存者母亲、保健专业人员、助产士和非法定服务人员;任何方法。排除标准:一般医疗保健或与生育无关;评论文章、信件、书评、评论。灰色文献通过相关网站报告论文、博客、政策、指南和资源进行搜索。结果纳入12篇11项研究的文献和29篇灰色文献。从研究中确定了三个关键主题:a)妇女对获得和参与产妇服务障碍的看法;B)卫生保健专业人员确定的挑战和需求;c)人口贩运对孕产妇和新生儿结局的影响。灰色文献资源主要包括博客、资料单、单张或网页、研究或咨询报告。生还者母亲的产妇经历如下:不熟悉和缺乏获得所有部门系统和信息的机会,获得护理和权利的障碍,来自伙伴/贩运者的当代暴力威胁,自由行动的能力受到限制,与创伤有关的问题,分散政策,以及处理多个新系统。结论虽然一些来源表明了应采用的原则,但缺乏卫生保健专业人员和非法定服务人员如何在产妇期间提供最佳护理和支持的细节。需要进一步的研究,从中可以得出关于良好产妇做法和法定和非法定服务之间有效交叉的建议,并随后在不同的系统和环境中动员起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Care and support during maternity for mothers affected by modern slavery: A scoping review

Background

Modern slavery is a largely hidden crime disproportionately affecting women and girls, with 71% of the world's enslaved people being female and approximately one third estimated to be pregnant. Healthcare professionals experience difficulties in caring for mothers affected by modern slavery, including asking appropriate questions and initiating discussions, making safe referrals, being uncertain about entitlements, and facing obstacles in accessing language support and specialist mental health services. Despite the expectation of cohesive and consistent services, which avoid the recounting of experiences that may re-traumatise, interdisciplinary collaborations between maternity services and non-statutory agencies remain unclear.

Objective

To map the available evidence and resources on maternity care provision and non-statutory support to pregnant women and mothers affected by modern slavery.

Design

A scoping review was conducted following the JBI methodology for scoping reviews.

Methods

Five databases (Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Dissertations & Thesis A&I, Embase, Scopus) were searched. Inclusion criteria: English language; published between 2012 and May 2022; related to both maternity care provision and modern slavery; cross-sectional perspectives, including survivor mothers, healthcare professionals, midwives, and non-statutory service staff; any methodology. Exclusion criteria: general healthcare or not maternity related; opinion pieces, letters, book reviews, commentaries. Grey literature was searched using relevant websites reporting theses, blogs, policies, guidelines, and resources.

Results

Twelve articles reporting 11 studies and 29 grey literature reports were retained for the scoping review. Three key themes were identified from research studies: a) women's perspectives on barriers to access and engagement with maternity services; b) challenges and needs identified by healthcare professionals; and c) the impact of human trafficking on maternal and neonatal outcomes. The grey literature resources comprised mainly blogs, information sheets, leaflets or webpages, and research or consultation reports. Maternity was being experienced by survivor mothers with the following: unfamiliarity with and lack of access to systems and information across all sectors, barriers to care and entitlements, contemporary threats of violence from partners/traffickers, restricted ability to move freely, issues related to traumatisation, dispersal policies, and dealing with multiple new systems.

Conclusions

Although several sources indicate principles that should be adopted, the detail of how optimal care and support during maternity should be provided by healthcare professionals and non-statutory service staff is lacking. Further research is required, from which recommendations for good maternity practice and the effective intersection between statutory and non-statutory services can be derived and subsequently mobilised across different systems and settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
期刊最新文献
Development and psychometric evaluation of the self-care of informal caregivers inventory Practice of blood pressure self-monitoring and associated factors among hypertensive patients on follow-up visits at hospitals, West Shoa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia, 2022…An institution-based cross-sectional study Understanding frailty and its opposites from community-dwelling older peoples’ perspectives: A phenomenological qualitative study Self-management in the post-hair transplantation recovery period among patients with androgenetic alopecia: A qualitative study Exploring the reasons behind nurses' intentions to leave their hospital or profession: A cross-sectional survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1