教师就地反馈素养的发展:英语写作教师对人机一体反馈创新的尝试

IF 5.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessing Writing Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100739
Peisha Wu , Shulin Yu , Yanqi Luo
{"title":"教师就地反馈素养的发展:英语写作教师对人机一体反馈创新的尝试","authors":"Peisha Wu ,&nbsp;Shulin Yu ,&nbsp;Yanqi Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2023.100739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While recent years have witnessed increasing theoretical and empirical elaboration on the construct of teacher feedback literacy in higher education and second language education, little research has investigated the development of teacher feedback literacy, especially when teachers collaborate in an attempt to improve feedback strategies with technology. To fill this gap, the present study examined two L2 writing teachers taking the initiative to create, update, and implement a human-computer-automatic writing evaluation (AWE) integral feedback platform, and how such a feedback innovation process impacted their feedback literacy development. The analysis of multiple sources of data, including semi-structured interviews, stimulated recalls, class observation, and artifacts, revealed that the two teachers approached the innovation by orchestrating mediating tools, interacting dialogically with social agents, reflecting critically, and crossing boundaries. Through this process, the development of teacher feedback literacy occurred at varying rates across different aspects. Specifically, positive changes were effected in the teachers’ feedback thinking as well as feedback giving and sharing practices. However, the teachers’ feedback literacy in classroom practice did not seem to have generated as salient a positive outcome. Possible reasons are discussed regarding the scope of the feedback innovation and contextual constraints, and implications are offered. The study underscored L2 writing teacher feedback literacy as a developmental phenomenon molded by situated social practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 100739"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development of teacher feedback literacy in situ: EFL writing teachers’ endeavor to human-computer-AWE integral feedback innovation\",\"authors\":\"Peisha Wu ,&nbsp;Shulin Yu ,&nbsp;Yanqi Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asw.2023.100739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While recent years have witnessed increasing theoretical and empirical elaboration on the construct of teacher feedback literacy in higher education and second language education, little research has investigated the development of teacher feedback literacy, especially when teachers collaborate in an attempt to improve feedback strategies with technology. To fill this gap, the present study examined two L2 writing teachers taking the initiative to create, update, and implement a human-computer-automatic writing evaluation (AWE) integral feedback platform, and how such a feedback innovation process impacted their feedback literacy development. The analysis of multiple sources of data, including semi-structured interviews, stimulated recalls, class observation, and artifacts, revealed that the two teachers approached the innovation by orchestrating mediating tools, interacting dialogically with social agents, reflecting critically, and crossing boundaries. Through this process, the development of teacher feedback literacy occurred at varying rates across different aspects. Specifically, positive changes were effected in the teachers’ feedback thinking as well as feedback giving and sharing practices. However, the teachers’ feedback literacy in classroom practice did not seem to have generated as salient a positive outcome. Possible reasons are discussed regarding the scope of the feedback innovation and contextual constraints, and implications are offered. The study underscored L2 writing teacher feedback literacy as a developmental phenomenon molded by situated social practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523000478\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523000478","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,关于高等教育和第二语言教育中教师反馈素养建构的理论和实证研究越来越多,但很少有研究调查教师反馈素养的发展,特别是当教师合作试图用技术改进反馈策略时。为了填补这一空白,本研究考察了两位二语写作教师主动创建、更新和实施人机自动写作评估(AWE)集成反馈平台,以及这种反馈创新过程如何影响他们的反馈素养发展。对多种数据来源的分析,包括半结构化访谈、刺激回忆、课堂观察和人工制品,揭示了两位教师通过协调调解工具、与社会代理人进行对话互动、批判性反思和跨越边界来实现创新。在这一过程中,教师反馈素养的发展在不同方面呈现出不同的速度。具体而言,教师的反馈思维以及反馈给予和分享实践都发生了积极的变化。然而,教师的反馈素养在课堂实践中似乎并没有产生显著的积极结果。讨论了关于反馈创新的范围和上下文约束的可能原因,并提供了影响。本研究强调第二语言写作教师反馈素养是一种由情境社会实践塑造的发展现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The development of teacher feedback literacy in situ: EFL writing teachers’ endeavor to human-computer-AWE integral feedback innovation

While recent years have witnessed increasing theoretical and empirical elaboration on the construct of teacher feedback literacy in higher education and second language education, little research has investigated the development of teacher feedback literacy, especially when teachers collaborate in an attempt to improve feedback strategies with technology. To fill this gap, the present study examined two L2 writing teachers taking the initiative to create, update, and implement a human-computer-automatic writing evaluation (AWE) integral feedback platform, and how such a feedback innovation process impacted their feedback literacy development. The analysis of multiple sources of data, including semi-structured interviews, stimulated recalls, class observation, and artifacts, revealed that the two teachers approached the innovation by orchestrating mediating tools, interacting dialogically with social agents, reflecting critically, and crossing boundaries. Through this process, the development of teacher feedback literacy occurred at varying rates across different aspects. Specifically, positive changes were effected in the teachers’ feedback thinking as well as feedback giving and sharing practices. However, the teachers’ feedback literacy in classroom practice did not seem to have generated as salient a positive outcome. Possible reasons are discussed regarding the scope of the feedback innovation and contextual constraints, and implications are offered. The study underscored L2 writing teacher feedback literacy as a developmental phenomenon molded by situated social practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy and fairness of generative AI in automated essay scoring: Comparing GPT-4o, feature-based models, and human raters A multidimensional approach to the impact of achievement emotions on high school students' L2 writing performance Aligning ACTFL writing proficiency guidelines with CEFR descriptors: Insights from Chinese writing assessment Assessing fairness in finetuned scoring models with demographically restricted training data Evaluating the consistency between human raters and three AI systems on the scoring of argumentative essays
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1