行为规范与学习方法:课外参与与学业准备之间关系的调节因素

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of School Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101250
Lixin Ren , Huiping Wu , Jieqiong Fan , Lin Li
{"title":"行为规范与学习方法:课外参与与学业准备之间关系的调节因素","authors":"Lixin Ren ,&nbsp;Huiping Wu ,&nbsp;Jieqiong Fan ,&nbsp;Lin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Participation in organized extracurricular activities (EAs) has become increasingly common among preschool-aged children. Prior studies have shown inconsistent findings on the association between young children's involvement in EAs and their subsequent developmental outcomes. Moving beyond examining the main effects of EA participation, this study focused on whether children's behavioral regulation and approaches to learning—two important domain-general skills closely linked to learning—would moderate the association between EA participation and academic readiness. Participants included 317 Chinese preschoolers residing in Shanghai. The breadth of EA participation positively predicted children's early math skills, but only for those demonstrating relatively lower behavioral regulation or less positive approaches to learning. The findings provide support for the compensatory hypothesis that participation in EAs is more beneficial for children at greater developmental risk. Unexpectedly, the intensity of EA participation negatively predicted receptive vocabulary beyond certain thresholds among children with relatively poor behavioral regulation or approaches to learning (<em>B</em> = −2.272, <em>p</em> = .032, effect size (<em>ES</em>) = 0.423), but this relationship was not significant for children with better learning behaviors (<em>B</em> = 0.111, <em>p</em> = .712, <em>ES</em> = 0.021). According to the findings, children with worse behavioral regulation and approaches to learning were actually more vulnerable to the negative effects of intensive participation in EAs (<em>B</em> = −15.698, <em>p</em> = .022, <em>ES</em> = 1.797). EA participation did not predict children's Chinese word reading (<em>p</em>s &gt; 0.05). The findings revealed a complex pattern of relationships between preschoolers' EA participation and academic readiness and have highlighted the importance of considering child characteristics when examining the developmental effects of EA involvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 101250"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavioral regulation and approaches to learning: Moderators of the association between extracurricular involvement and academic readiness\",\"authors\":\"Lixin Ren ,&nbsp;Huiping Wu ,&nbsp;Jieqiong Fan ,&nbsp;Lin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Participation in organized extracurricular activities (EAs) has become increasingly common among preschool-aged children. Prior studies have shown inconsistent findings on the association between young children's involvement in EAs and their subsequent developmental outcomes. Moving beyond examining the main effects of EA participation, this study focused on whether children's behavioral regulation and approaches to learning—two important domain-general skills closely linked to learning—would moderate the association between EA participation and academic readiness. Participants included 317 Chinese preschoolers residing in Shanghai. The breadth of EA participation positively predicted children's early math skills, but only for those demonstrating relatively lower behavioral regulation or less positive approaches to learning. The findings provide support for the compensatory hypothesis that participation in EAs is more beneficial for children at greater developmental risk. Unexpectedly, the intensity of EA participation negatively predicted receptive vocabulary beyond certain thresholds among children with relatively poor behavioral regulation or approaches to learning (<em>B</em> = −2.272, <em>p</em> = .032, effect size (<em>ES</em>) = 0.423), but this relationship was not significant for children with better learning behaviors (<em>B</em> = 0.111, <em>p</em> = .712, <em>ES</em> = 0.021). According to the findings, children with worse behavioral regulation and approaches to learning were actually more vulnerable to the negative effects of intensive participation in EAs (<em>B</em> = −15.698, <em>p</em> = .022, <em>ES</em> = 1.797). EA participation did not predict children's Chinese word reading (<em>p</em>s &gt; 0.05). The findings revealed a complex pattern of relationships between preschoolers' EA participation and academic readiness and have highlighted the importance of considering child characteristics when examining the developmental effects of EA involvement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of School Psychology\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of School Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002244052300078X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002244052300078X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

参加有组织的课外活动(EAs)在学龄前儿童中变得越来越普遍。先前的研究表明,幼儿参与ea与其随后的发展结果之间的关系并不一致。除了考察EA参与的主要影响外,本研究还关注儿童的行为调节和学习方法——与学习密切相关的两个重要领域的一般技能——是否会调节EA参与和学业准备之间的关系。参与者包括317名居住在上海的中国学龄前儿童。参与EA的广度对儿童的早期数学技能有积极的预测作用,但只适用于那些表现出相对较低的行为调节或不太积极的学习方法的儿童。这一发现为补偿性假设提供了支持,即参与ea对具有更大发展风险的儿童更有益。出乎意料的是,在行为调节或学习方式相对较差的儿童中,EA参与强度负向预测接受性词汇超过一定阈值(B = - 2.272, p = 0.032,效应量(ES) = 0.423),但对于学习行为较好的儿童,这种关系不显著(B = 0.111, p = 0.712, ES = 0.021)。结果表明,行为规范和学习方式较差的儿童更容易受到密集参与ea的负面影响(B = - 15.698, p = 0.022, ES = 1.797)。参与EA并不能预测儿童的中文单词阅读(ps >0.05)。研究结果揭示了学龄前儿童的EA参与和学业准备之间的复杂关系模式,并强调了在检查EA参与的发展影响时考虑儿童特征的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Behavioral regulation and approaches to learning: Moderators of the association between extracurricular involvement and academic readiness

Participation in organized extracurricular activities (EAs) has become increasingly common among preschool-aged children. Prior studies have shown inconsistent findings on the association between young children's involvement in EAs and their subsequent developmental outcomes. Moving beyond examining the main effects of EA participation, this study focused on whether children's behavioral regulation and approaches to learning—two important domain-general skills closely linked to learning—would moderate the association between EA participation and academic readiness. Participants included 317 Chinese preschoolers residing in Shanghai. The breadth of EA participation positively predicted children's early math skills, but only for those demonstrating relatively lower behavioral regulation or less positive approaches to learning. The findings provide support for the compensatory hypothesis that participation in EAs is more beneficial for children at greater developmental risk. Unexpectedly, the intensity of EA participation negatively predicted receptive vocabulary beyond certain thresholds among children with relatively poor behavioral regulation or approaches to learning (B = −2.272, p = .032, effect size (ES) = 0.423), but this relationship was not significant for children with better learning behaviors (B = 0.111, p = .712, ES = 0.021). According to the findings, children with worse behavioral regulation and approaches to learning were actually more vulnerable to the negative effects of intensive participation in EAs (B = −15.698, p = .022, ES = 1.797). EA participation did not predict children's Chinese word reading (ps > 0.05). The findings revealed a complex pattern of relationships between preschoolers' EA participation and academic readiness and have highlighted the importance of considering child characteristics when examining the developmental effects of EA involvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evidence of a limited relationship between reading fluency and reading comprehension of academic language Moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy as predictors of bystander behaviors in peer victimization in middle school: A one-year longitudinal study School-based mental health support for migrant children and young people: A scoping review Peer victimization, internalizing problems, and satisfaction with friends: A two-wave analysis of individual and class-level associations in adolescence Evaluating the treatment utility of the Cognitive Assessment System: A meta-analysis of reading and mathematics outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1