黎巴嫩护士和医生之间的跨专业合作

Maha A. Habre , Mary Dolansky , Marilyn Lotas , Souha Allam , Joyce Fitzpatrick
{"title":"黎巴嫩护士和医生之间的跨专业合作","authors":"Maha A. Habre ,&nbsp;Mary Dolansky ,&nbsp;Marilyn Lotas ,&nbsp;Souha Allam ,&nbsp;Joyce Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This cross-sectional mixed-methods study includes description of nurse-physician collaboration in Lebanon and comparison of perceptions of collaborative practice experiences of nurses and physicians. Online surveys were completed by 223 Registered Nurses<span> (RNs) and 60 Physicians (MDs) currently practicing in in-hospital settings in Lebanon. The Nurse-Physician Collaboration scale, demographic and background items, and four open-ended questions were included in the survey. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses, correlations, and categorical analyses were conducted. RNs reported significantly less frequency of collaboration than MDs (t = 2.62, p = 0.009). Females reported significantly less collaboration frequency than males (t = −3.44, p = 0.001). Stratifying by gender, male MDs reported the highest collaboration compared with male RNs (t = 2.25; p = 0.027). RNs with graduate degrees reported the least collaboration compared to holders of Bachelor's degrees and technical diplomas (F = 4.00, p = 0.02). Across both professions, motivation was the most frequently perceived and highest ranked facilitator for collaboration, and time pressure was the most frequently perceived and top ranked barrier. Of those who responded to an open-ended question, the majority of respondents (58.5%) shared a positive recent experience of nurse-physician collaboration, and 85% of responses to another question identified achievement of best quality patient outcomes as a perceived benefit of nurse-physician collaboration. Strategies that enhance the identified facilitators, overcome barriers, and equip nurses and physicians to collaborate should be implemented within hospitals in Lebanon.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interprofessional collaboration among nurses and physicians in Lebanon\",\"authors\":\"Maha A. Habre ,&nbsp;Mary Dolansky ,&nbsp;Marilyn Lotas ,&nbsp;Souha Allam ,&nbsp;Joyce Fitzpatrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This cross-sectional mixed-methods study includes description of nurse-physician collaboration in Lebanon and comparison of perceptions of collaborative practice experiences of nurses and physicians. Online surveys were completed by 223 Registered Nurses<span> (RNs) and 60 Physicians (MDs) currently practicing in in-hospital settings in Lebanon. The Nurse-Physician Collaboration scale, demographic and background items, and four open-ended questions were included in the survey. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses, correlations, and categorical analyses were conducted. RNs reported significantly less frequency of collaboration than MDs (t = 2.62, p = 0.009). Females reported significantly less collaboration frequency than males (t = −3.44, p = 0.001). Stratifying by gender, male MDs reported the highest collaboration compared with male RNs (t = 2.25; p = 0.027). RNs with graduate degrees reported the least collaboration compared to holders of Bachelor's degrees and technical diplomas (F = 4.00, p = 0.02). Across both professions, motivation was the most frequently perceived and highest ranked facilitator for collaboration, and time pressure was the most frequently perceived and top ranked barrier. Of those who responded to an open-ended question, the majority of respondents (58.5%) shared a positive recent experience of nurse-physician collaboration, and 85% of responses to another question identified achievement of best quality patient outcomes as a perceived benefit of nurse-physician collaboration. Strategies that enhance the identified facilitators, overcome barriers, and equip nurses and physicians to collaborate should be implemented within hospitals in Lebanon.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452623000290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452623000290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个横断面混合方法的研究包括黎巴嫩护士-医生合作的描述和比较的看法,护士和医生的合作实践经验。在线调查由目前在黎巴嫩医院执业的223名注册护士(RNs)和60名医生(md)完成。调查包括护士-医生合作量表、人口统计和背景项目以及四个开放式问题。进行描述性和比较统计分析、相关性和分类分析。注册护士报告的合作频率明显低于MDs (t = 2.62, p = 0.009)。女性报告的合作频率显著低于男性(t = - 3.44, p = 0.001)。按性别分层,与男性注册护士相比,男性医学博士报告的合作程度最高(t = 2.25;p = 0.027)。与持有学士学位和技术文凭的注册护士相比,拥有研究生学位的注册护士报告的合作最少(F = 4.00, p = 0.02)。在这两个职业中,动机是最常被感知到的,也是排名最高的合作促进因素,而时间压力是最常被感知到的,也是排名最高的障碍。在回答开放式问题的受访者中,大多数受访者(58.5%)分享了近期护士-医生合作的积极经历,而对另一个问题的85%的受访者认为,护士-医生合作的好处是实现最佳质量的患者治疗结果。应在黎巴嫩的医院内实施加强已确定的促进因素、克服障碍并使护士和医生具备合作能力的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interprofessional collaboration among nurses and physicians in Lebanon

This cross-sectional mixed-methods study includes description of nurse-physician collaboration in Lebanon and comparison of perceptions of collaborative practice experiences of nurses and physicians. Online surveys were completed by 223 Registered Nurses (RNs) and 60 Physicians (MDs) currently practicing in in-hospital settings in Lebanon. The Nurse-Physician Collaboration scale, demographic and background items, and four open-ended questions were included in the survey. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses, correlations, and categorical analyses were conducted. RNs reported significantly less frequency of collaboration than MDs (t = 2.62, p = 0.009). Females reported significantly less collaboration frequency than males (t = −3.44, p = 0.001). Stratifying by gender, male MDs reported the highest collaboration compared with male RNs (t = 2.25; p = 0.027). RNs with graduate degrees reported the least collaboration compared to holders of Bachelor's degrees and technical diplomas (F = 4.00, p = 0.02). Across both professions, motivation was the most frequently perceived and highest ranked facilitator for collaboration, and time pressure was the most frequently perceived and top ranked barrier. Of those who responded to an open-ended question, the majority of respondents (58.5%) shared a positive recent experience of nurse-physician collaboration, and 85% of responses to another question identified achievement of best quality patient outcomes as a perceived benefit of nurse-physician collaboration. Strategies that enhance the identified facilitators, overcome barriers, and equip nurses and physicians to collaborate should be implemented within hospitals in Lebanon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
期刊最新文献
Response-shift effect for self-assessment: Magnitude and accuracy within an interprofessional education course Interprofessional heart failure education for self-care knowledge and medication adherence in cardiac rehabiliation patients: A short report How team-based are rural or underserved clinics where AHEC scholars train? Evaluation of alternate form reliability for the 9-item versions of the interprofessional socialization and valuing scale (ISVS-9A/9B) Advancing interprofessional workplace learning: Successful implementation of the ‘WILD Series©’ hybrid professional development model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1