脊柱推拿联合运动疗法治疗肩部疼痛和残疾可能比单独运动疗法更有效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100688
Francisco Fleury Uchoa Santos-Júnior , Denise Martineli Rossi , Letícia Jonas de Freitas , Jaqueline Martins , Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira
{"title":"脊柱推拿联合运动疗法治疗肩部疼痛和残疾可能比单独运动疗法更有效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Francisco Fleury Uchoa Santos-Júnior ,&nbsp;Denise Martineli Rossi ,&nbsp;Letícia Jonas de Freitas ,&nbsp;Jaqueline Martins ,&nbsp;Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate whether exercise therapy associated with spinal manipulation is more effective than exercise therapy alone in patients with shoulder pain.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, PEDro, and clinical trial registers. Included studies were written in English without date restrictions.</p></div><div><h3>Study selection</h3><p>We selected controlled trial studies investigating thoracic, cervical, and cervicothoracic spinal manipulations and therapeutic exercises for patients with shoulder pain symptoms and dysfunction outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Data extraction</h3><p>The study included six clinical trials with 431 participants. Low and very low-quality evidence suggests that the association of interventions can be effective for pain intensity in the first 2 weeks (mean difference [MD], −0.99; [confidence interval] CI, −1.61–0.38) and from the 4th to the 6th week (MD, −0.61; CI, −1.01 to 0.20), respectively. Furthermore, very low-quality evidence suggests that this association was effective in improving shoulder pain disability for up to 6 weeks (up to 2 weeks, standardized mean differences [SMD], −0.65; CI, −1.25 to −0.06; 4th through the 6th week SMD, −0.48; CI -0.71 to −0.26).</p></div><div><h3>Data synthesis</h3><p>Comparison of spinal manipulation plus exercises with only exercises for pain intensity and shoulder pain disability showed that: after two and four to six weeks after treatment, there was a significant mean difference between groups for pain intensity pain and disability. At 6 months, there was no difference between the groups neither for pain intensity nor for disability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The association of spinal manipulation with strengthening and stretching exercises can be more effective than isolated exercises for shoulder pain intensity up to 2 weeks and disability within 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Physical therapists may associate spinal manipulation with exercises for shoulder pain, which may improve pain intensity and disability, especially in the initial treatment phase.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinal manipulation combined with exercise therapy could be more effective than exercise therapy alone for shoulder pain and disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Fleury Uchoa Santos-Júnior ,&nbsp;Denise Martineli Rossi ,&nbsp;Letícia Jonas de Freitas ,&nbsp;Jaqueline Martins ,&nbsp;Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate whether exercise therapy associated with spinal manipulation is more effective than exercise therapy alone in patients with shoulder pain.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, PEDro, and clinical trial registers. Included studies were written in English without date restrictions.</p></div><div><h3>Study selection</h3><p>We selected controlled trial studies investigating thoracic, cervical, and cervicothoracic spinal manipulations and therapeutic exercises for patients with shoulder pain symptoms and dysfunction outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Data extraction</h3><p>The study included six clinical trials with 431 participants. Low and very low-quality evidence suggests that the association of interventions can be effective for pain intensity in the first 2 weeks (mean difference [MD], −0.99; [confidence interval] CI, −1.61–0.38) and from the 4th to the 6th week (MD, −0.61; CI, −1.01 to 0.20), respectively. Furthermore, very low-quality evidence suggests that this association was effective in improving shoulder pain disability for up to 6 weeks (up to 2 weeks, standardized mean differences [SMD], −0.65; CI, −1.25 to −0.06; 4th through the 6th week SMD, −0.48; CI -0.71 to −0.26).</p></div><div><h3>Data synthesis</h3><p>Comparison of spinal manipulation plus exercises with only exercises for pain intensity and shoulder pain disability showed that: after two and four to six weeks after treatment, there was a significant mean difference between groups for pain intensity pain and disability. At 6 months, there was no difference between the groups neither for pain intensity nor for disability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The association of spinal manipulation with strengthening and stretching exercises can be more effective than isolated exercises for shoulder pain intensity up to 2 weeks and disability within 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Physical therapists may associate spinal manipulation with exercises for shoulder pain, which may improve pain intensity and disability, especially in the initial treatment phase.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068923000329\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068923000329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨运动疗法联合脊柱推拿治疗肩痛是否比单纯运动疗法更有效。数据来源通过检索MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL、PEDro和临床试验注册来确定研究。纳入的研究用英文撰写,没有日期限制。研究选择:我们选择了对照试验研究,研究胸椎、颈椎和颈胸椎脊柱操作和治疗性运动对肩部疼痛症状和功能障碍患者的影响。本研究包括6项临床试验,431名参与者。低质量和极低质量的证据表明,干预措施的关联对前2周的疼痛强度是有效的(平均差异[MD], - 0.99;[置信区间]CI,−1.61-0.38)和从第4周到第6周(MD,−0.61;CI,分别为- 1.01 ~ 0.20)。此外,非常低质量的证据表明,这种关联在改善长达6周的肩痛残疾方面是有效的(长达2周,标准化平均差异[SMD],−0.65;CI,−1.25 ~−0.06;第4至第6周SMD,−0.48;CI -0.71至- 0.26)。数据综合脊柱操作加运动与仅运动疼痛强度和肩部疼痛残疾的比较表明:治疗后2周和4至6周,组间疼痛强度疼痛和残疾的平均差异显著。6个月时,两组之间无论是疼痛强度还是残疾程度都没有差异。结论脊柱推拿联合强化和伸展运动对肩部疼痛强度达2周和残疾6个月的患者比单独运动更有效。对实践的启示物理治疗师可能会将脊柱操作与肩部疼痛的锻炼联系起来,这可能会改善疼痛强度和残疾,特别是在初始治疗阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spinal manipulation combined with exercise therapy could be more effective than exercise therapy alone for shoulder pain and disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To investigate whether exercise therapy associated with spinal manipulation is more effective than exercise therapy alone in patients with shoulder pain.

Data sources

Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, PEDro, and clinical trial registers. Included studies were written in English without date restrictions.

Study selection

We selected controlled trial studies investigating thoracic, cervical, and cervicothoracic spinal manipulations and therapeutic exercises for patients with shoulder pain symptoms and dysfunction outcomes.

Data extraction

The study included six clinical trials with 431 participants. Low and very low-quality evidence suggests that the association of interventions can be effective for pain intensity in the first 2 weeks (mean difference [MD], −0.99; [confidence interval] CI, −1.61–0.38) and from the 4th to the 6th week (MD, −0.61; CI, −1.01 to 0.20), respectively. Furthermore, very low-quality evidence suggests that this association was effective in improving shoulder pain disability for up to 6 weeks (up to 2 weeks, standardized mean differences [SMD], −0.65; CI, −1.25 to −0.06; 4th through the 6th week SMD, −0.48; CI -0.71 to −0.26).

Data synthesis

Comparison of spinal manipulation plus exercises with only exercises for pain intensity and shoulder pain disability showed that: after two and four to six weeks after treatment, there was a significant mean difference between groups for pain intensity pain and disability. At 6 months, there was no difference between the groups neither for pain intensity nor for disability.

Conclusion

The association of spinal manipulation with strengthening and stretching exercises can be more effective than isolated exercises for shoulder pain intensity up to 2 weeks and disability within 6 months.

Implications for practice

Physical therapists may associate spinal manipulation with exercises for shoulder pain, which may improve pain intensity and disability, especially in the initial treatment phase.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal that provides for the publication of high quality research articles and review papers that are as broad as the many disciplines that influence and underpin the principles and practice of osteopathic medicine. Particular emphasis is given to basic science research, clinical epidemiology and health social science in relation to osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine. The Editorial Board encourages submission of articles based on both quantitative and qualitative research designs. The Editorial Board also aims to provide a forum for discourse and debate on any aspect of osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine with the aim of critically evaluating existing practices in regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neuromusculoskeletal disorders and somatic dysfunction. All manuscripts submitted to the IJOM are subject to a blinded review process. The categories currently available for publication include reports of original research, review papers, commentaries and articles related to clinical practice, including case reports. Further details can be found in the IJOM Instructions for Authors. Manuscripts are accepted for publication with the understanding that no substantial part has been, or will be published elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Osteopathic manual treatment in women with endometriosis: A scoping review on clinical symptoms, fertility and quality of life The effectiveness of neuromuscular spinal manipulation- an updated systematic review and meta-analysis Osteopathic treatment of a person with Arnold-Chiari malformation and Syringomyelia: A case report Is visceral osteopathy therapy effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis Professional skill priorities: Comparison views of osteopathy industry professionals and osteopathy students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1