PRAFT和RPBFT:一类区块链共识算法及其在V2G网络电动汽车充电场景中的应用

Haoxiang Luo , Hongfang Yu , Jian Luo
{"title":"PRAFT和RPBFT:一类区块链共识算法及其在V2G网络电动汽车充电场景中的应用","authors":"Haoxiang Luo ,&nbsp;Hongfang Yu ,&nbsp;Jian Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the improvement of people's awareness of environmental protection, electric vehicles (EVs) are becoming more and more popular, and the issue of vehicle to grid (V2G) energy trading is also put on the agenda. To protect the security and privacy of EVs when they trade energy with the grid, many scholars have introduced the emerging blockchain technology. However, there are few studies on the blockchain consensus algorithm for the EVs charging scenario, while the consensus is exactly the core technology in blockchain for reaching agreement in distributed systems, which to some extent determines the efficiency of V2G. Therefore, aiming at the above scenario, this paper proposes two low-complexity consensus algorithms, namely (PBFT-enabled RAFT) PRAFT and (RAFT-enable PBFT) RPBFT, which are combined the typical blockchain consensus PBFT and RAFT, and can be respectively applied to two EVs charging scenarios. In our V2G model, charging piles (CPs) and charging stations (CSs) will participate in the blockchain consensus as nodes. Through theoretical analysis and simulation, and compared with other methods, these two consensus algorithms have high scalability, low communication complexity, low storage overhead, high throughput, and low latency. Meanwhile they can also avoid the risk of Byzantine leader in RAFT. Finally, we demonstrate the two consensus algorithms in a real charging scenario, which show their transaction latency and energy consumption can well adapt to the EVs charging scenario in V2G networks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100724,"journal":{"name":"Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 61-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRAFT and RPBFT: A class of blockchain consensus algorithm and their applications in electric vehicles charging scenarios for V2G networks\",\"authors\":\"Haoxiang Luo ,&nbsp;Hongfang Yu ,&nbsp;Jian Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With the improvement of people's awareness of environmental protection, electric vehicles (EVs) are becoming more and more popular, and the issue of vehicle to grid (V2G) energy trading is also put on the agenda. To protect the security and privacy of EVs when they trade energy with the grid, many scholars have introduced the emerging blockchain technology. However, there are few studies on the blockchain consensus algorithm for the EVs charging scenario, while the consensus is exactly the core technology in blockchain for reaching agreement in distributed systems, which to some extent determines the efficiency of V2G. Therefore, aiming at the above scenario, this paper proposes two low-complexity consensus algorithms, namely (PBFT-enabled RAFT) PRAFT and (RAFT-enable PBFT) RPBFT, which are combined the typical blockchain consensus PBFT and RAFT, and can be respectively applied to two EVs charging scenarios. In our V2G model, charging piles (CPs) and charging stations (CSs) will participate in the blockchain consensus as nodes. Through theoretical analysis and simulation, and compared with other methods, these two consensus algorithms have high scalability, low communication complexity, low storage overhead, high throughput, and low latency. Meanwhile they can also avoid the risk of Byzantine leader in RAFT. Finally, we demonstrate the two consensus algorithms in a real charging scenario, which show their transaction latency and energy consumption can well adapt to the EVs charging scenario in V2G networks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 61-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667345223000184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667345223000184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

随着人们环保意识的提高,电动汽车(ev)越来越普及,车对网(V2G)能源交易问题也提上了日程。为了保护电动汽车与电网进行能源交易时的安全性和隐私性,许多学者引入了新兴的区块链技术。然而,针对电动汽车充电场景的区块链共识算法研究较少,而共识恰恰是区块链在分布式系统中达成共识的核心技术,在一定程度上决定了V2G的效率。因此,针对上述场景,本文提出了两种低复杂度的共识算法,即(PBFT-enabled RAFT) PRAFT和(RAFT-enable PBFT) RPBFT,将典型的区块链共识PBFT和RAFT结合在一起,可分别应用于两种电动汽车充电场景。在我们的V2G模型中,充电桩(CPs)和充电站(CSs)将作为节点参与区块链共识。通过理论分析和仿真,并与其他方法进行比较,这两种共识算法具有高扩展性、低通信复杂度、低存储开销、高吞吐量和低延迟等特点。同时也可以避免RAFT中拜占庭式leader的风险。最后,在实际充电场景中对两种共识算法进行了验证,验证结果表明,两种共识算法的交易延迟和能耗都能很好地适应V2G网络下的电动汽车充电场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PRAFT and RPBFT: A class of blockchain consensus algorithm and their applications in electric vehicles charging scenarios for V2G networks

With the improvement of people's awareness of environmental protection, electric vehicles (EVs) are becoming more and more popular, and the issue of vehicle to grid (V2G) energy trading is also put on the agenda. To protect the security and privacy of EVs when they trade energy with the grid, many scholars have introduced the emerging blockchain technology. However, there are few studies on the blockchain consensus algorithm for the EVs charging scenario, while the consensus is exactly the core technology in blockchain for reaching agreement in distributed systems, which to some extent determines the efficiency of V2G. Therefore, aiming at the above scenario, this paper proposes two low-complexity consensus algorithms, namely (PBFT-enabled RAFT) PRAFT and (RAFT-enable PBFT) RPBFT, which are combined the typical blockchain consensus PBFT and RAFT, and can be respectively applied to two EVs charging scenarios. In our V2G model, charging piles (CPs) and charging stations (CSs) will participate in the blockchain consensus as nodes. Through theoretical analysis and simulation, and compared with other methods, these two consensus algorithms have high scalability, low communication complexity, low storage overhead, high throughput, and low latency. Meanwhile they can also avoid the risk of Byzantine leader in RAFT. Finally, we demonstrate the two consensus algorithms in a real charging scenario, which show their transaction latency and energy consumption can well adapt to the EVs charging scenario in V2G networks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-work conserving dynamic scheduling of moldable gang tasks on multicore systems Multi-objective optimization algorithms for intrusion detection in IoT networks: A systematic review Constructing immersive toy trial experience in mobile augmented reality Machine learning techniques for IoT security: Current research and future vision with generative AI and large language models Ransomware on cyber-physical systems: Taxonomies, case studies, security gaps, and open challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1