Antonio De Nicola , Anna Formica , Michele Missikoff , Elaheh Pourabbas , Francesco Taglino
{"title":"一种参数相似度方法:基于语义标注大数据集的对比实验","authors":"Antonio De Nicola , Anna Formica , Michele Missikoff , Elaheh Pourabbas , Francesco Taglino","doi":"10.1016/j.websem.2023.100773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present the parametric method <em>SemSim<sup>p</sup></em><span> aimed at measuring semantic similarity of digital resources. </span><em>SemSim<sup>p</sup></em> is based on the notion of <em>information content</em>, and it leverages a reference ontology and taxonomic reasoning, encompassing different approaches for weighting the concepts of the ontology. In particular, weights can be computed by considering either the available digital resources or the structure of the reference ontology of a given domain. <em>SemSim<sup>p</sup></em><span> is assessed against six representative semantic similarity methods for comparing sets of concepts proposed in the literature, by carrying out an experimentation that includes both a statistical analysis and an expert judgment evaluation. To the purpose of achieving a reliable assessment, we used a real-world large dataset based on the Digital Library of the Association for Computing Machinery<span> (ACM), and a reference ontology derived from the ACM Computing Classification System (ACM-CCS). For each method, we considered two indicators. The first concerns the degree of confidence to identify the similarity among the papers belonging to some special issues selected from the ACM Transactions on Information Systems journal, the second the Pearson correlation with human judgment. The results reveal that one of the configurations of </span></span><em>SemSim<sup>p</sup></em> outperforms the other assessed methods. An additional experiment performed in the domain of physics shows that, in general, <em>SemSim<sup>p</sup></em> provides better results than the other similarity methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Web Semantics","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 100773"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A parametric similarity method: Comparative experiments based on semantically annotated large datasets\",\"authors\":\"Antonio De Nicola , Anna Formica , Michele Missikoff , Elaheh Pourabbas , Francesco Taglino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.websem.2023.100773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We present the parametric method <em>SemSim<sup>p</sup></em><span> aimed at measuring semantic similarity of digital resources. </span><em>SemSim<sup>p</sup></em> is based on the notion of <em>information content</em>, and it leverages a reference ontology and taxonomic reasoning, encompassing different approaches for weighting the concepts of the ontology. In particular, weights can be computed by considering either the available digital resources or the structure of the reference ontology of a given domain. <em>SemSim<sup>p</sup></em><span> is assessed against six representative semantic similarity methods for comparing sets of concepts proposed in the literature, by carrying out an experimentation that includes both a statistical analysis and an expert judgment evaluation. To the purpose of achieving a reliable assessment, we used a real-world large dataset based on the Digital Library of the Association for Computing Machinery<span> (ACM), and a reference ontology derived from the ACM Computing Classification System (ACM-CCS). For each method, we considered two indicators. The first concerns the degree of confidence to identify the similarity among the papers belonging to some special issues selected from the ACM Transactions on Information Systems journal, the second the Pearson correlation with human judgment. The results reveal that one of the configurations of </span></span><em>SemSim<sup>p</sup></em> outperforms the other assessed methods. An additional experiment performed in the domain of physics shows that, in general, <em>SemSim<sup>p</sup></em> provides better results than the other similarity methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Web Semantics\",\"volume\":\"76 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Web Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570826823000021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Web Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570826823000021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A parametric similarity method: Comparative experiments based on semantically annotated large datasets
We present the parametric method SemSimp aimed at measuring semantic similarity of digital resources. SemSimp is based on the notion of information content, and it leverages a reference ontology and taxonomic reasoning, encompassing different approaches for weighting the concepts of the ontology. In particular, weights can be computed by considering either the available digital resources or the structure of the reference ontology of a given domain. SemSimp is assessed against six representative semantic similarity methods for comparing sets of concepts proposed in the literature, by carrying out an experimentation that includes both a statistical analysis and an expert judgment evaluation. To the purpose of achieving a reliable assessment, we used a real-world large dataset based on the Digital Library of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), and a reference ontology derived from the ACM Computing Classification System (ACM-CCS). For each method, we considered two indicators. The first concerns the degree of confidence to identify the similarity among the papers belonging to some special issues selected from the ACM Transactions on Information Systems journal, the second the Pearson correlation with human judgment. The results reveal that one of the configurations of SemSimp outperforms the other assessed methods. An additional experiment performed in the domain of physics shows that, in general, SemSimp provides better results than the other similarity methods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Web Semantics is an interdisciplinary journal based on research and applications of various subject areas that contribute to the development of a knowledge-intensive and intelligent service Web. These areas include: knowledge technologies, ontology, agents, databases and the semantic grid, obviously disciplines like information retrieval, language technology, human-computer interaction and knowledge discovery are of major relevance as well. All aspects of the Semantic Web development are covered. The publication of large-scale experiments and their analysis is also encouraged to clearly illustrate scenarios and methods that introduce semantics into existing Web interfaces, contents and services. The journal emphasizes the publication of papers that combine theories, methods and experiments from different subject areas in order to deliver innovative semantic methods and applications.