Guofa Li, Xiaojian Wu, Arno Eichberger, Paul Green, Cristina Olaverri-Monreal, Weiquan Yan, Yechen Qin, Yuezhi Li
{"title":"驾驶员对不同分心任务的脑电图反应","authors":"Guofa Li, Xiaojian Wu, Arno Eichberger, Paul Green, Cristina Olaverri-Monreal, Weiquan Yan, Yechen Qin, Yuezhi Li","doi":"10.1007/s42154-022-00206-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Driver distraction has been deemed a major cause of traffic accidents. However, drivers’ brain response activities to different distraction types have not been well investigated. The purpose of this study is to investigate the response of electroencephalography (EEG) activities to different distraction tasks. In the conducted simulation tests, three secondary tasks (i.e., a clock task, a 2-back task, and a navigation task) are designed to induce different types of driver distractions. Twenty-four participants are recruited for the designed tests, and differences in drivers’ brain response activities concerning distraction types are investigated. The results show that the differences in comprehensive distraction are more significant than that in single cognitive distraction. Friedman test and post hoc two-tailed Nemenyi test are conducted to further identify the differences in band activities among brain regions. The results show that the theta energy in the frontal lobe is significantly higher than that in other brain regions in distracted driving, whereas the alpha energy in the temporal lobe significantly decreases compared to other brain regions. These results provide theoretical references for the development of distraction detection systems based on EEG signals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36310,"journal":{"name":"Automotive Innovation","volume":"6 1","pages":"20 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42154-022-00206-z.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drivers’ EEG Responses to Different Distraction Tasks\",\"authors\":\"Guofa Li, Xiaojian Wu, Arno Eichberger, Paul Green, Cristina Olaverri-Monreal, Weiquan Yan, Yechen Qin, Yuezhi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42154-022-00206-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Driver distraction has been deemed a major cause of traffic accidents. However, drivers’ brain response activities to different distraction types have not been well investigated. The purpose of this study is to investigate the response of electroencephalography (EEG) activities to different distraction tasks. In the conducted simulation tests, three secondary tasks (i.e., a clock task, a 2-back task, and a navigation task) are designed to induce different types of driver distractions. Twenty-four participants are recruited for the designed tests, and differences in drivers’ brain response activities concerning distraction types are investigated. The results show that the differences in comprehensive distraction are more significant than that in single cognitive distraction. Friedman test and post hoc two-tailed Nemenyi test are conducted to further identify the differences in band activities among brain regions. The results show that the theta energy in the frontal lobe is significantly higher than that in other brain regions in distracted driving, whereas the alpha energy in the temporal lobe significantly decreases compared to other brain regions. These results provide theoretical references for the development of distraction detection systems based on EEG signals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Automotive Innovation\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"20 - 31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42154-022-00206-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Automotive Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42154-022-00206-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automotive Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42154-022-00206-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Drivers’ EEG Responses to Different Distraction Tasks
Driver distraction has been deemed a major cause of traffic accidents. However, drivers’ brain response activities to different distraction types have not been well investigated. The purpose of this study is to investigate the response of electroencephalography (EEG) activities to different distraction tasks. In the conducted simulation tests, three secondary tasks (i.e., a clock task, a 2-back task, and a navigation task) are designed to induce different types of driver distractions. Twenty-four participants are recruited for the designed tests, and differences in drivers’ brain response activities concerning distraction types are investigated. The results show that the differences in comprehensive distraction are more significant than that in single cognitive distraction. Friedman test and post hoc two-tailed Nemenyi test are conducted to further identify the differences in band activities among brain regions. The results show that the theta energy in the frontal lobe is significantly higher than that in other brain regions in distracted driving, whereas the alpha energy in the temporal lobe significantly decreases compared to other brain regions. These results provide theoretical references for the development of distraction detection systems based on EEG signals.
期刊介绍:
Automotive Innovation is dedicated to the publication of innovative findings in the automotive field as well as other related disciplines, covering the principles, methodologies, theoretical studies, experimental studies, product engineering and engineering application. The main topics include but are not limited to: energy-saving, electrification, intelligent and connected, new energy vehicle, safety and lightweight technologies. The journal presents the latest trend and advances of automotive technology.