土耳其版导尿管自我护理管理问卷的有效性和可靠性

Duygu Soydaş RN, BSN, MSc, PhD, Ümmü Yildiz Findik RN, BSN, MSc, PhD
{"title":"土耳其版导尿管自我护理管理问卷的有效性和可靠性","authors":"Duygu Soydaş RN, BSN, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Ümmü Yildiz Findik RN, BSN, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1111/ijun.12375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research aims to analyse the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Urinary Catheter Self-Efficacy Scale (C-SE) and the Urinary Catheter Self-Management Scale (C-SMG), which comprise the Urinary Catheter Self-Care Management Questionnaire. This research is planned as a cross-sectional, methodological type of scale adaptation study. The research was conducted in three hospitals in the northwest of Turkey with 101 patients. Content validity index and confirmatory factor analysis were used in the validity analyses. In the reliability analyses, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, the split-half method, the item-total score, and Pearson's correlation analyses were used. The content validity index was 0.911 for the C-SE and 0.989 for the C-SMG. Cronbach's alpha values for the scales were 0.928 and 0.882, respectively. Besides, the item-total correlations changed between 0.562 and 0.831 for the C-SE and between 0.315 and 0.759 for the C-SMG. The coefficients got in halving were 0.960 and 0.943, respectively. The two scales that make up the Urinary Catheter Self-Care Management Questionnaire are valid and reliable measurement tools that can be used for patients undergoing long-term urinary catheterization in Turkey. In line with the results obtained from this study, we suggest that the Urinary Catheter Self-Care Management Questionnaire should be used to evaluate the self-efficacy or self-management levels of Turkish patients undergoing long-term urinary catheterization and to evaluate the effects of nursing interventions on the self-efficacy or self-management levels of patients who have undergone long-term urinary catheterization.</p>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"17 3","pages":"258-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Urinary Catheter Self-Care Management Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Duygu Soydaş RN, BSN, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Ümmü Yildiz Findik RN, BSN, MSc, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijun.12375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This research aims to analyse the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Urinary Catheter Self-Efficacy Scale (C-SE) and the Urinary Catheter Self-Management Scale (C-SMG), which comprise the Urinary Catheter Self-Care Management Questionnaire. This research is planned as a cross-sectional, methodological type of scale adaptation study. The research was conducted in three hospitals in the northwest of Turkey with 101 patients. Content validity index and confirmatory factor analysis were used in the validity analyses. In the reliability analyses, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, the split-half method, the item-total score, and Pearson's correlation analyses were used. The content validity index was 0.911 for the C-SE and 0.989 for the C-SMG. Cronbach's alpha values for the scales were 0.928 and 0.882, respectively. Besides, the item-total correlations changed between 0.562 and 0.831 for the C-SE and between 0.315 and 0.759 for the C-SMG. The coefficients got in halving were 0.960 and 0.943, respectively. The two scales that make up the Urinary Catheter Self-Care Management Questionnaire are valid and reliable measurement tools that can be used for patients undergoing long-term urinary catheterization in Turkey. In line with the results obtained from this study, we suggest that the Urinary Catheter Self-Care Management Questionnaire should be used to evaluate the self-efficacy or self-management levels of Turkish patients undergoing long-term urinary catheterization and to evaluate the effects of nursing interventions on the self-efficacy or self-management levels of patients who have undergone long-term urinary catheterization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"258-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析土耳其版导尿管自我效能量表(C-SE)和导尿管自我管理量表(C-MG)的有效性和可靠性,该量表包括导尿管自我护理管理问卷。这项研究计划作为一项横断面的、方法论类型的量表适应研究。这项研究在土耳其西北部的三家医院进行,共有101名患者。有效性分析采用内容有效性指数和验证性因素分析。在信度分析中,使用了Cronbach的α系数、分半法、项目总分和Pearson的相关分析。C-SE和C-SMG的内容有效性指数分别为0.911和0.989。量表的克朗巴赫α值分别为0.928和0.882。此外,C-SE的项目总相关性在0.562和0.831之间变化,C-SMG的项目总相关在0.315和0.759之间变化。减半后得到的系数分别为0.960和0.943。构成导尿管自我护理管理问卷的两个量表是有效可靠的测量工具,可用于土耳其接受长期导尿管的患者。根据本研究的结果,我们建议使用导尿管自我护理管理问卷来评估长期导尿土耳其患者的自我效能或自我管理水平,并评估护理干预对长期导尿患者自我效能或自管理水平的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Urinary Catheter Self-Care Management Questionnaire

This research aims to analyse the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Urinary Catheter Self-Efficacy Scale (C-SE) and the Urinary Catheter Self-Management Scale (C-SMG), which comprise the Urinary Catheter Self-Care Management Questionnaire. This research is planned as a cross-sectional, methodological type of scale adaptation study. The research was conducted in three hospitals in the northwest of Turkey with 101 patients. Content validity index and confirmatory factor analysis were used in the validity analyses. In the reliability analyses, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, the split-half method, the item-total score, and Pearson's correlation analyses were used. The content validity index was 0.911 for the C-SE and 0.989 for the C-SMG. Cronbach's alpha values for the scales were 0.928 and 0.882, respectively. Besides, the item-total correlations changed between 0.562 and 0.831 for the C-SE and between 0.315 and 0.759 for the C-SMG. The coefficients got in halving were 0.960 and 0.943, respectively. The two scales that make up the Urinary Catheter Self-Care Management Questionnaire are valid and reliable measurement tools that can be used for patients undergoing long-term urinary catheterization in Turkey. In line with the results obtained from this study, we suggest that the Urinary Catheter Self-Care Management Questionnaire should be used to evaluate the self-efficacy or self-management levels of Turkish patients undergoing long-term urinary catheterization and to evaluate the effects of nursing interventions on the self-efficacy or self-management levels of patients who have undergone long-term urinary catheterization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
期刊最新文献
The effects of continuous care utilizing rational emotive therapy on prostate cancer patients Knowledge and practices of nurses working in urology clinics on fluid–electrolyte monitoring and management Postoperative nursing in robot-assisted urologic surgery: Are there any platform-based differences? Adherence and uncertainty during rehabilitation for urinary incontinence: Validation of a scale Assessing the reliability and usefulness of ChatGPT responses on intermittent catheterization queries: A critical analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1