国际条约是否只对批准国产生影响？1883年至2018年间，国际劳工组织《产妇保护公约》对160个国家的影响

IF 2.8 4区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS International Labour Review Pub Date : 2022-06-07 DOI:10.1111/ilr.12371

Keonhi SON

{"title":"国际条约是否只对批准国产生影响？1883年至2018年间，国际劳工组织《产妇保护公约》对160个国家的影响","authors":"Keonhi SON","doi":"10.1111/ilr.12371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Contrary to the expectation that only ratifying States comply with ILO Conventions, this article argues that even non-ratifying States improve their domestic standards consistent with ILO Conventions to enhance their legitimacy. Using a new historical database, I track changes in maternity leave provisions in 160 countries between 1883 and 2018 in the light of the International Labour Conference's adoption of the Maternity Protection Conventions. The empirical findings confirm that both non-ratifying and ratifying States expanded the terms and conditions of their paid maternity leave policies shortly thereafter.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47216,"journal":{"name":"International Labour Review","volume":"162 2","pages":"245-269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ilr.12371","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do international treaties have an impact only on ratifying States? The influence of the ILO Maternity Protection Conventions in 160 countries between 1883 and 2018\",\"authors\":\"Keonhi SON\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ilr.12371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Contrary to the expectation that only ratifying States comply with ILO Conventions, this article argues that even non-ratifying States improve their domestic standards consistent with ILO Conventions to enhance their legitimacy. Using a new historical database, I track changes in maternity leave provisions in 160 countries between 1883 and 2018 in the light of the International Labour Conference's adoption of the Maternity Protection Conventions. The empirical findings confirm that both non-ratifying and ratifying States expanded the terms and conditions of their paid maternity leave policies shortly thereafter.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Labour Review\",\"volume\":\"162 2\",\"pages\":\"245-269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ilr.12371\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Labour Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12371\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labour Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

与只有批准国遵守劳工组织公约的预期相反，本条认为，即使是未批准国也要根据劳工组织公约改进其国内标准，以提高其合法性。根据国际劳工大会通过的《产妇保护公约》，我使用一个新的历史数据库跟踪了1883年至2018年间160个国家产假规定的变化。实证研究结果证实，未批准和批准的国家不久后都扩大了其带薪产假政策的条款和条件。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Do international treaties have an impact only on ratifying States? The influence of the ILO Maternity Protection Conventions in 160 countries between 1883 and 2018

Contrary to the expectation that only ratifying States comply with ILO Conventions, this article argues that even non-ratifying States improve their domestic standards consistent with ILO Conventions to enhance their legitimacy. Using a new historical database, I track changes in maternity leave provisions in 160 countries between 1883 and 2018 in the light of the International Labour Conference's adoption of the Maternity Protection Conventions. The empirical findings confirm that both non-ratifying and ratifying States expanded the terms and conditions of their paid maternity leave policies shortly thereafter.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Labour Review Multiple-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Labour Review is the world"s leading multidisciplinary journal of labour market institutions and economics. Its aim is to advance academic research and inform policy debate and decision-making in these fields by bringing together the original thinking of lawyers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and industrial relations specialists on a broad range of labour market policy and social protection concerns. The International Labour Review also features concise reports on current developments considered to be of particular interest to those working in these fields and reviews of recent major publications. It is committed to an editorial policy that combines accessibility with rigorous, insightful analysis and the highest scholarly standards.