谁要求发展中国家实行劳动管制?重新审视内部人-外部人理论*

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS International Labour Review Pub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI:10.1111/ilr.12363
Lucas RONCONI, Ravi KANBUR, Santiago LÓPEZ-CARIBONI
{"title":"谁要求发展中国家实行劳动管制?重新审视内部人-外部人理论*","authors":"Lucas RONCONI,&nbsp;Ravi KANBUR,&nbsp;Santiago LÓPEZ-CARIBONI","doi":"10.1111/ilr.12363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The “insider–outsider” perspective, which dominates the discourse on labour regulations, argues that protective regulations hurt the less well-off outsiders but are kept in place in the interests of the insiders, who are covered by the regulations. Thus, if the insider–outsider divide were as depicted in the standard representation, outsiders would be strongly against regulations. Our evidence that a large majority of outsiders in developing countries in fact support protective labour regulations calls for a rethink of the sharp insider–outsider divide. We suggest a number of avenues for exploration, including income-sharing, transitions, fairness and employer power in labour markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":47216,"journal":{"name":"International Labour Review","volume":"162 2","pages":"223-243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who demands labour (de)regulation in the developing world? Revisiting the insider–outsider theory*\",\"authors\":\"Lucas RONCONI,&nbsp;Ravi KANBUR,&nbsp;Santiago LÓPEZ-CARIBONI\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ilr.12363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The “insider–outsider” perspective, which dominates the discourse on labour regulations, argues that protective regulations hurt the less well-off outsiders but are kept in place in the interests of the insiders, who are covered by the regulations. Thus, if the insider–outsider divide were as depicted in the standard representation, outsiders would be strongly against regulations. Our evidence that a large majority of outsiders in developing countries in fact support protective labour regulations calls for a rethink of the sharp insider–outsider divide. We suggest a number of avenues for exploration, including income-sharing, transitions, fairness and employer power in labour markets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Labour Review\",\"volume\":\"162 2\",\"pages\":\"223-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Labour Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12363\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labour Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

主导劳动法规讨论的“内部人-外部人”观点认为,保护性法规伤害了不太富裕的外部人,但为了内部人的利益而保留,内部人受法规保护。因此,如果内部人和外部人的分歧如标准陈述中所述,外部人将强烈反对法规。我们的证据表明,发展中国家的绝大多数局外人实际上支持保护性劳动法规,这需要重新思考内部人与外部人之间的尖锐分歧。我们提出了一些探索途径,包括收入分享、转型、公平和劳动力市场中的雇主权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who demands labour (de)regulation in the developing world? Revisiting the insider–outsider theory*

The “insider–outsider” perspective, which dominates the discourse on labour regulations, argues that protective regulations hurt the less well-off outsiders but are kept in place in the interests of the insiders, who are covered by the regulations. Thus, if the insider–outsider divide were as depicted in the standard representation, outsiders would be strongly against regulations. Our evidence that a large majority of outsiders in developing countries in fact support protective labour regulations calls for a rethink of the sharp insider–outsider divide. We suggest a number of avenues for exploration, including income-sharing, transitions, fairness and employer power in labour markets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The International Labour Review is the world"s leading multidisciplinary journal of labour market institutions and economics. Its aim is to advance academic research and inform policy debate and decision-making in these fields by bringing together the original thinking of lawyers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and industrial relations specialists on a broad range of labour market policy and social protection concerns. The International Labour Review also features concise reports on current developments considered to be of particular interest to those working in these fields and reviews of recent major publications. It is committed to an editorial policy that combines accessibility with rigorous, insightful analysis and the highest scholarly standards.
期刊最新文献
International Labour Review to move to Open Library of Humanities in 2025 Editorial reviewers Issue Information – TOC Introduction: International experiences of multilevel collective bargaining and lessons for implementation Tracing the potential benefits and complex contingencies of multilevel collective bargaining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1