Jing Cao, Yiping Chen, Yao Jiang, Jingshu Chen, Junhua Wu
{"title":"通过放牧或围栏管理重建的人工草地:对植物和土壤特性的影响","authors":"Jing Cao, Yiping Chen, Yao Jiang, Jingshu Chen, Junhua Wu","doi":"10.1002/glr2.12039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Revegetation is widely used in degraded grassland restoration. However, the responses of grassland plant and soil properties to fencing (FC) and grazing (GZ) remain poorly understood, especially the vegetation–soil coupling coordination (<i>C</i><sub>d</sub>) mechanism. This study explored single and interactive responses of vegetation and soil properties under FC and GZ after revegetation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A field experiment with FC and GZ treatments was conducted in Loess Plateau reconstructed grassland, with degraded grassland as the control (CK). Plant and soil properties and <i>C</i><sub>d</sub> were analyzed using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and principal component analysis (PCA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The order of soil comprehensive evaluation (SCE) was GZ > FC > CK, while that of vegetation comprehensive evaluation (VCE) was FC > GZ > CK. The <i>C</i><sub>d</sub> of CK was 0.39 (mild imbalance), while the values of FC and GZ were 0.57 and 0.54, respectively (little coordination). The VCE/SCE of FC was 1.48 (soil lag type), and the values of GZ and CK were 0.69 and 0.35, respectively (vegetation lag and vegetation loss type, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Both GZ and FC improved <i>C</i><sub>d</sub> and facilitated recovery. However, degraded grasslands should be restored via moderate grazing for sustainable ecological and economic development.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100593,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Research","volume":"2 1","pages":"69-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/glr2.12039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of re-established artificial grasslands via grazing or fencing: Effects on plant and soil properties\",\"authors\":\"Jing Cao, Yiping Chen, Yao Jiang, Jingshu Chen, Junhua Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/glr2.12039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Revegetation is widely used in degraded grassland restoration. However, the responses of grassland plant and soil properties to fencing (FC) and grazing (GZ) remain poorly understood, especially the vegetation–soil coupling coordination (<i>C</i><sub>d</sub>) mechanism. This study explored single and interactive responses of vegetation and soil properties under FC and GZ after revegetation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A field experiment with FC and GZ treatments was conducted in Loess Plateau reconstructed grassland, with degraded grassland as the control (CK). Plant and soil properties and <i>C</i><sub>d</sub> were analyzed using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and principal component analysis (PCA).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The order of soil comprehensive evaluation (SCE) was GZ > FC > CK, while that of vegetation comprehensive evaluation (VCE) was FC > GZ > CK. The <i>C</i><sub>d</sub> of CK was 0.39 (mild imbalance), while the values of FC and GZ were 0.57 and 0.54, respectively (little coordination). The VCE/SCE of FC was 1.48 (soil lag type), and the values of GZ and CK were 0.69 and 0.35, respectively (vegetation lag and vegetation loss type, respectively).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both GZ and FC improved <i>C</i><sub>d</sub> and facilitated recovery. However, degraded grasslands should be restored via moderate grazing for sustainable ecological and economic development.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grassland Research\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"69-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/glr2.12039\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grassland Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/glr2.12039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/glr2.12039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景植被恢复在退化草地恢复中有着广泛的应用。然而,对草地植物和土壤特性对围栏(FC)和放牧(GZ)的反应,特别是植被-土壤耦合协调(Cd)机制,仍知之甚少。本研究探讨了植被恢复后FC和GZ对植被和土壤性质的单一和交互响应。方法以退化草地为对照,在黄土高原重建草地上进行FC和GZ处理的田间试验。采用层次分析法(AHP)和主成分分析法(PCA)对植物和土壤性质以及Cd进行了分析。结果土壤综合评价(SCE)排序为GZ >; FC >; CK,植被综合评价(VCE)为FC >; GZ >; CK的Cd为0.39(轻度不平衡),而FC和GZ的值分别为0.57和0.54(少量配位)。FC的VCE/SCE为1.48(土壤滞后型),GZ和CK的值分别为0.69和0.35(植被滞后型和植被损失型)。结论GZ和FC均能提高Cd含量,促进Cd的回收。然而,退化的草原应该通过适度放牧来恢复,以实现可持续的生态和经济发展。
Management of re-established artificial grasslands via grazing or fencing: Effects on plant and soil properties
Background
Revegetation is widely used in degraded grassland restoration. However, the responses of grassland plant and soil properties to fencing (FC) and grazing (GZ) remain poorly understood, especially the vegetation–soil coupling coordination (Cd) mechanism. This study explored single and interactive responses of vegetation and soil properties under FC and GZ after revegetation.
Methods
A field experiment with FC and GZ treatments was conducted in Loess Plateau reconstructed grassland, with degraded grassland as the control (CK). Plant and soil properties and Cd were analyzed using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and principal component analysis (PCA).
Results
The order of soil comprehensive evaluation (SCE) was GZ > FC > CK, while that of vegetation comprehensive evaluation (VCE) was FC > GZ > CK. The Cd of CK was 0.39 (mild imbalance), while the values of FC and GZ were 0.57 and 0.54, respectively (little coordination). The VCE/SCE of FC was 1.48 (soil lag type), and the values of GZ and CK were 0.69 and 0.35, respectively (vegetation lag and vegetation loss type, respectively).
Conclusions
Both GZ and FC improved Cd and facilitated recovery. However, degraded grasslands should be restored via moderate grazing for sustainable ecological and economic development.