获得信贷和对农业技术采用的异质性影响:来自埃塞俄比亚大型农村调查的证据

IF 2.5 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie Pub Date : 2023-04-11 DOI:10.1111/cjag.12329
Mekdim D. Regassa, Mohammed B. Degnet, Mequanint B. Melesse
{"title":"获得信贷和对农业技术采用的异质性影响:来自埃塞俄比亚大型农村调查的证据","authors":"Mekdim D. Regassa,&nbsp;Mohammed B. Degnet,&nbsp;Mequanint B. Melesse","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Modern agricultural technologies hold huge potential for increasing productivity and reducing poverty in developing countries. However, adoption levels of these technologies have remained disappointingly low in Africa. This paper analyzes the effect of access to credit on the likelihood of adoption and use intensity of chemical fertilizers using data from large rural surveys in Ethiopia. Using a heteroscedasticity-based identification strategy to address the endogenous nature of access to credit, we find that access to credit has significant positive effects on adoption and intensity of use of chemical fertilizers. However, important heterogeneities are observed. Credit obtained from formal sources is more important for the intensity of use than for the decision to adopt chemical fertilizers. Credit taken with the primary purpose of financing agricultural inputs is more likely to promote adoption of chemical fertilizers than credit taken per se. Furthermore, reported credit effects are larger when estimated against the sample of credit-constrained non-users as compared with the pool of the whole sample of credit non-users. The results remain robust to several sensitivity analyses. Our results yield useful implications for the design, promotion, and targeting of credit services to leverage their effect on adoption of agricultural technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55291,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie","volume":"71 2","pages":"231-253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cjag.12329","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to credit and heterogeneous effects on agricultural technology adoption: Evidence from large rural surveys in Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Mekdim D. Regassa,&nbsp;Mohammed B. Degnet,&nbsp;Mequanint B. Melesse\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cjag.12329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Modern agricultural technologies hold huge potential for increasing productivity and reducing poverty in developing countries. However, adoption levels of these technologies have remained disappointingly low in Africa. This paper analyzes the effect of access to credit on the likelihood of adoption and use intensity of chemical fertilizers using data from large rural surveys in Ethiopia. Using a heteroscedasticity-based identification strategy to address the endogenous nature of access to credit, we find that access to credit has significant positive effects on adoption and intensity of use of chemical fertilizers. However, important heterogeneities are observed. Credit obtained from formal sources is more important for the intensity of use than for the decision to adopt chemical fertilizers. Credit taken with the primary purpose of financing agricultural inputs is more likely to promote adoption of chemical fertilizers than credit taken per se. Furthermore, reported credit effects are larger when estimated against the sample of credit-constrained non-users as compared with the pool of the whole sample of credit non-users. The results remain robust to several sensitivity analyses. Our results yield useful implications for the design, promotion, and targeting of credit services to leverage their effect on adoption of agricultural technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie\",\"volume\":\"71 2\",\"pages\":\"231-253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cjag.12329\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cjag.12329\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cjag.12329","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代农业技术在提高发展中国家生产力和减少贫困方面具有巨大潜力。然而,这些技术在非洲的采用率仍然低得令人失望。本文利用埃塞俄比亚大型农村调查的数据,分析了获得信贷对化肥采用可能性和使用强度的影响。使用基于异方差的识别策略来解决获得信贷的内生性质,我们发现获得信贷对化肥的采用和使用强度有显著的积极影响。然而,观察到了重要的异质性。从正规来源获得的信贷对使用强度比决定使用化肥更重要。以资助农业投入为主要目的的信贷比信贷本身更有可能促进化肥的使用。此外,与整个信贷非用户样本相比,根据信贷约束非用户样本估计报告的信贷影响更大。结果对几个敏感性分析仍然是稳健的。我们的研究结果对信贷服务的设计、推广和目标定位产生了有益的启示,以利用其对农业技术采用的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Access to credit and heterogeneous effects on agricultural technology adoption: Evidence from large rural surveys in Ethiopia

Modern agricultural technologies hold huge potential for increasing productivity and reducing poverty in developing countries. However, adoption levels of these technologies have remained disappointingly low in Africa. This paper analyzes the effect of access to credit on the likelihood of adoption and use intensity of chemical fertilizers using data from large rural surveys in Ethiopia. Using a heteroscedasticity-based identification strategy to address the endogenous nature of access to credit, we find that access to credit has significant positive effects on adoption and intensity of use of chemical fertilizers. However, important heterogeneities are observed. Credit obtained from formal sources is more important for the intensity of use than for the decision to adopt chemical fertilizers. Credit taken with the primary purpose of financing agricultural inputs is more likely to promote adoption of chemical fertilizers than credit taken per se. Furthermore, reported credit effects are larger when estimated against the sample of credit-constrained non-users as compared with the pool of the whole sample of credit non-users. The results remain robust to several sensitivity analyses. Our results yield useful implications for the design, promotion, and targeting of credit services to leverage their effect on adoption of agricultural technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
23.20
自引率
1.10%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie (CJAE) serves as a platform for scholarly research in agricultural, resource, and environmental economics, covering topics such as agri-food, agri-business, policy, resource utilization, and environmental impacts. It publishes a range of theoretical, applied and policy-related articles.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Introduction to the special issue in honor of the late Dr. James Rude For Amber waves of grain: Commodity booms and structural transformation in 19th century America Asymmetric spot-futures prices adjustments in Quebec grain markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1