多年生黑麦草、多年生黑麦草和白三叶草与多品种农田系统营养价值的比较

Shona Baker, Mary B. Lynch, Fionnuala Godwin, Tommy M. Boland, Alexander C. O. Evans, Paul N. C. Murphy, Alan K. Kelly, Helen Sheridan
{"title":"多年生黑麦草、多年生黑麦草和白三叶草与多品种农田系统营养价值的比较","authors":"Shona Baker,&nbsp;Mary B. Lynch,&nbsp;Fionnuala Godwin,&nbsp;Tommy M. Boland,&nbsp;Alexander C. O. Evans,&nbsp;Paul N. C. Murphy,&nbsp;Alan K. Kelly,&nbsp;Helen Sheridan","doi":"10.1002/glr2.12052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Limited information is available regarding the nutritive value and structural characteristics of multispecies swards when rotationally grazed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Three farmlet types were investigated in terms of their nutritive value: <i>Lolium perenne</i> (LP); <i>L. perenne</i>+<i>Trifolium repens</i> (LP+TR); and a multispecies sward containing grasses, legumes and herbs (MSS). Farmlets were stocked with beef steers (2.5 livestock units ha<sup>−1</sup>), grazed on a 1 ha scale to 6 cm (MSS) and 4 cm (LP and LP+TR) residuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A greater ash concentration was found in MSS than LP (84 vs. 75 g kg<sup>−1</sup> DM). Both LP+TR and MSS had higher crude protein and lower neutral detergent fibre concentrations than LP. The relative ranking of water soluble carbohydrate and dry matter (DM) concentration was LP &gt; LP+TR &gt; MSS. Despite the leaf component of the LP farmlet contributing more to herbage DM, the organic matter digestibilities of the swards were similar.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The MSS and LP+TR farmlets achieved similar forage quality under intensive grazing to LP. However, it is worth noting that MSS had a higher concentration of acid detergent lignin, which can negatively impact digestibility. Further investigation is needed to determine optimal grazing management practices that can minimise the effects of higher lignin concentration on digestibility in multispecies swards.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100593,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Research","volume":"2 2","pages":"129-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/glr2.12052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of the nutritive value of perennial ryegrass, perennial ryegrass and white clover and multispecies-based farmlet systems\",\"authors\":\"Shona Baker,&nbsp;Mary B. Lynch,&nbsp;Fionnuala Godwin,&nbsp;Tommy M. Boland,&nbsp;Alexander C. O. Evans,&nbsp;Paul N. C. Murphy,&nbsp;Alan K. Kelly,&nbsp;Helen Sheridan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/glr2.12052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Limited information is available regarding the nutritive value and structural characteristics of multispecies swards when rotationally grazed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Three farmlet types were investigated in terms of their nutritive value: <i>Lolium perenne</i> (LP); <i>L. perenne</i>+<i>Trifolium repens</i> (LP+TR); and a multispecies sward containing grasses, legumes and herbs (MSS). Farmlets were stocked with beef steers (2.5 livestock units ha<sup>−1</sup>), grazed on a 1 ha scale to 6 cm (MSS) and 4 cm (LP and LP+TR) residuals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A greater ash concentration was found in MSS than LP (84 vs. 75 g kg<sup>−1</sup> DM). Both LP+TR and MSS had higher crude protein and lower neutral detergent fibre concentrations than LP. The relative ranking of water soluble carbohydrate and dry matter (DM) concentration was LP &gt; LP+TR &gt; MSS. Despite the leaf component of the LP farmlet contributing more to herbage DM, the organic matter digestibilities of the swards were similar.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The MSS and LP+TR farmlets achieved similar forage quality under intensive grazing to LP. However, it is worth noting that MSS had a higher concentration of acid detergent lignin, which can negatively impact digestibility. Further investigation is needed to determine optimal grazing management practices that can minimise the effects of higher lignin concentration on digestibility in multispecies swards.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grassland Research\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"129-139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/glr2.12052\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grassland Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/glr2.12052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/glr2.12052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景可获得的关于多物种草地在轮作放牧时的营养价值和结构特征的信息有限。方法对三种农家乐的营养价值进行调查:多年生黑麦草(LP);L.perenne+Trifolium repens(LP+TR);以及含有草、豆类和草本植物的多品种草地(MSS)。农场饲养了肉牛(2.5头 单位ha−1),在1 公顷至6 cm(MSS)和4 cm(LP和LP+TR)残差。结果MSS中的灰分浓度高于LP(84 vs.75 g kg−1 DM)。LP+TR和MSS均具有比LP更高的粗蛋白和更低的中性洗涤纤维浓度。水溶性碳水化合物和干物质(DM)浓度的相对排名为LP >; LP+TR >; MSS。尽管LP农场的叶片成分对牧草DM的贡献更大,但草地的有机物消化能力相似。结论MSS和LP+TR小农场在集约放牧条件下获得了与LP相似的饲料质量。然而,值得注意的是,MSS具有较高浓度的酸性洗涤剂木质素,这会对消化率产生负面影响。需要进一步的研究来确定最佳的放牧管理实践,以最大限度地减少木质素浓度对多品种草地消化率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of the nutritive value of perennial ryegrass, perennial ryegrass and white clover and multispecies-based farmlet systems

Background

Limited information is available regarding the nutritive value and structural characteristics of multispecies swards when rotationally grazed.

Methods

Three farmlet types were investigated in terms of their nutritive value: Lolium perenne (LP); L. perenne+Trifolium repens (LP+TR); and a multispecies sward containing grasses, legumes and herbs (MSS). Farmlets were stocked with beef steers (2.5 livestock units ha−1), grazed on a 1 ha scale to 6 cm (MSS) and 4 cm (LP and LP+TR) residuals.

Results

A greater ash concentration was found in MSS than LP (84 vs. 75 g kg−1 DM). Both LP+TR and MSS had higher crude protein and lower neutral detergent fibre concentrations than LP. The relative ranking of water soluble carbohydrate and dry matter (DM) concentration was LP > LP+TR > MSS. Despite the leaf component of the LP farmlet contributing more to herbage DM, the organic matter digestibilities of the swards were similar.

Conclusions

The MSS and LP+TR farmlets achieved similar forage quality under intensive grazing to LP. However, it is worth noting that MSS had a higher concentration of acid detergent lignin, which can negatively impact digestibility. Further investigation is needed to determine optimal grazing management practices that can minimise the effects of higher lignin concentration on digestibility in multispecies swards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Forage yield and nutritive value of plantain and chicory for livestock feed at high altitudes in Peru Our world is changing Biocontrol agents enhance plant disease resistance by altering plant microbiomes Effect of fermented total mixed rations on rumen microbial communities and serum metabolites in lambs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1