《爱、性、性别与超级英雄》,杰弗里·A·布朗著,罗格斯大学出版社,2022年。

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE Pub Date : 2023-09-24 DOI:10.1111/jacc.13486
Cary Elza
{"title":"《爱、性、性别与超级英雄》,杰弗里·A·布朗著,罗格斯大学出版社,2022年。","authors":"Cary Elza","doi":"10.1111/jacc.13486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While scholarship on superheroes is prolific, Jeffrey A. Brown has succeeded several times in finding an as-yet-underexplored niche to unpack. In <i>Love, Sex, Gender, and Superheroes</i>, Brown delves into, in his words, “a range of issues about gender and sex that are modeled by superheroes, issues that are interconnected, shifting, progressive, conservative, and complex” (3). This clarity of objective characterizes his work in general, which is scholarly and incisive yet accessible to more than just an academic audience. His writing is ideal for teaching undergrads, asking them to think critically about the heroes who are often “assumed to be simple and innocent fun, not worthy of critical examination or reflection” (3). (At this point in the academic study of popular culture, surely we all know better, but it does bear repeating.)</p><p>This book, which has multiple full-color illustrations per chapter, is in many ways a continuation and expansion of his previous book, <i>Panthers, Hulks, and Ironhearts: Marvel, Diversity, and the 21st Century Superhero</i>, which addresses Marvel's history of racial and ethnic representation. Like that book, this one is well-researched, with a strong foundation of important cultural theorists (Laura Mulvey, Linda Williams, Henry Jenkins) and an evident understanding of recent work in the field. Williams gets the most shout-outs here; one of the most compelling arguments in the book draws a parallel between the superhero genre and the bodily genres Williams discusses in her work. To this end, the first chapter discusses the way in which the superhero body functions as an image of phallic power; by looking at an understudied body of work—superhero porn parodies, as well as the relationship between the comics and porn industries—Brown convincingly argues that the genre addresses social insecurity regarding hegemonic masculinity.</p><p>The following chapters address a wider spectrum of topics on gender and sexuality—Chapter Three compares superhero homosocial spaces to the real-life masculine ideal of the bachelor pad, while Chapter Four discusses the traditional mismatch of superheroes and domestic life. Here, as in other chapters, the examination of the genre's problematic past lays the groundwork for analysis of more recent narratives that suggest a progressive shift. This is true in most chapters (there are nine, in addition to the introduction and conclusion), and contributes to the positive tone of the book, which suggests that, mostly, the genre is responding to social change. Relatedly, Brown makes an interesting point in Chapter Seven about the ways in which allegory (which the genre has used as an excuse for many years—multiple readings are possible, but the difference is not real-world literal) becomes an obstacle to representation. This is one of the most powerful ideas in the book, especially for the purpose of teaching—that for so long, popular culture has relied upon allegory and metaphor, to the detriment of more explicit representations of identity.</p><p>This is closely related to Brown's overriding contention that one has only to scratch the surface of symbolism in the whole genre to find an obsession with sexuality and gender. Tropes of masks, disguises, and dual identities play into this, of course, and Brown discusses these in detail. In terms of method, the book relies heavily on identifying and analyzing visual and narrative tropes, but many of the elements he identifies have not been studied elsewhere in depth. For example, in Chapter Nine, the close textual analysis of visual codes in comics for orgasm, explosion, ejaculation, and death allows Brown to argue that “the superhero's little death facilitates a repeatable heroic sequence of creation, training, and victory” (206). Similarly, Chapter Five identifies visual codes for heterosexual romantic rituals and the ways in which the genre has adapted these codes for queer relationship narratives as well.</p><p>Of course, some of these main points are self-evident, like the assertion that the genre has traditionally denied its heroes the domestic comforts of marriage and children. But again, one of the most interesting takeaways from the book is the extent to which the industry is largely addressing the issues that Brown identifies. He concludes by discussing the ways fans mobilize superheroes in their expression and understanding of gender and sexuality. As the parent of a 6-year-old girl who wore her Spider-Gwen outfit (complete with tutu) to the premiere of <i>Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse</i>, I felt the final chapter's discussion of cosplay rang true; our experience of superheroes as a dominant lingua franca in current popular culture often obscures the real social work these narratives do in understanding and performing identity.</p>","PeriodicalId":44809,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Love, sex, gender and superheroesBy Jeffrey A. Brown, Rutgers University Press, 2022.\",\"authors\":\"Cary Elza\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jacc.13486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While scholarship on superheroes is prolific, Jeffrey A. Brown has succeeded several times in finding an as-yet-underexplored niche to unpack. In <i>Love, Sex, Gender, and Superheroes</i>, Brown delves into, in his words, “a range of issues about gender and sex that are modeled by superheroes, issues that are interconnected, shifting, progressive, conservative, and complex” (3). This clarity of objective characterizes his work in general, which is scholarly and incisive yet accessible to more than just an academic audience. His writing is ideal for teaching undergrads, asking them to think critically about the heroes who are often “assumed to be simple and innocent fun, not worthy of critical examination or reflection” (3). (At this point in the academic study of popular culture, surely we all know better, but it does bear repeating.)</p><p>This book, which has multiple full-color illustrations per chapter, is in many ways a continuation and expansion of his previous book, <i>Panthers, Hulks, and Ironhearts: Marvel, Diversity, and the 21st Century Superhero</i>, which addresses Marvel's history of racial and ethnic representation. Like that book, this one is well-researched, with a strong foundation of important cultural theorists (Laura Mulvey, Linda Williams, Henry Jenkins) and an evident understanding of recent work in the field. Williams gets the most shout-outs here; one of the most compelling arguments in the book draws a parallel between the superhero genre and the bodily genres Williams discusses in her work. To this end, the first chapter discusses the way in which the superhero body functions as an image of phallic power; by looking at an understudied body of work—superhero porn parodies, as well as the relationship between the comics and porn industries—Brown convincingly argues that the genre addresses social insecurity regarding hegemonic masculinity.</p><p>The following chapters address a wider spectrum of topics on gender and sexuality—Chapter Three compares superhero homosocial spaces to the real-life masculine ideal of the bachelor pad, while Chapter Four discusses the traditional mismatch of superheroes and domestic life. Here, as in other chapters, the examination of the genre's problematic past lays the groundwork for analysis of more recent narratives that suggest a progressive shift. This is true in most chapters (there are nine, in addition to the introduction and conclusion), and contributes to the positive tone of the book, which suggests that, mostly, the genre is responding to social change. Relatedly, Brown makes an interesting point in Chapter Seven about the ways in which allegory (which the genre has used as an excuse for many years—multiple readings are possible, but the difference is not real-world literal) becomes an obstacle to representation. This is one of the most powerful ideas in the book, especially for the purpose of teaching—that for so long, popular culture has relied upon allegory and metaphor, to the detriment of more explicit representations of identity.</p><p>This is closely related to Brown's overriding contention that one has only to scratch the surface of symbolism in the whole genre to find an obsession with sexuality and gender. Tropes of masks, disguises, and dual identities play into this, of course, and Brown discusses these in detail. In terms of method, the book relies heavily on identifying and analyzing visual and narrative tropes, but many of the elements he identifies have not been studied elsewhere in depth. For example, in Chapter Nine, the close textual analysis of visual codes in comics for orgasm, explosion, ejaculation, and death allows Brown to argue that “the superhero's little death facilitates a repeatable heroic sequence of creation, training, and victory” (206). Similarly, Chapter Five identifies visual codes for heterosexual romantic rituals and the ways in which the genre has adapted these codes for queer relationship narratives as well.</p><p>Of course, some of these main points are self-evident, like the assertion that the genre has traditionally denied its heroes the domestic comforts of marriage and children. But again, one of the most interesting takeaways from the book is the extent to which the industry is largely addressing the issues that Brown identifies. He concludes by discussing the ways fans mobilize superheroes in their expression and understanding of gender and sexuality. As the parent of a 6-year-old girl who wore her Spider-Gwen outfit (complete with tutu) to the premiere of <i>Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse</i>, I felt the final chapter's discussion of cosplay rang true; our experience of superheroes as a dominant lingua franca in current popular culture often obscures the real social work these narratives do in understanding and performing identity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jacc.13486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jacc.13486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然对超级英雄的研究成果颇丰,但杰弗里·A·布朗已经多次成功地找到了一个尚未被充分挖掘的利基市场。在《爱、性、性别和超级英雄》一书中,布朗用他的话说,深入探讨了“一系列以超级英雄为模型的关于性别和性的问题,这些问题是相互关联的、不断变化的、进步的、保守的和复杂的”(3)。这种清晰的目标是他的作品的特点,这是学术性的,精辟的,但不仅仅是学术观众可以接触到。他的作品非常适合教授本科生,要求他们批判性地思考那些经常“被认为是简单而天真的乐趣,不值得批判性地审视或反思”的英雄(3)。(在流行文化的学术研究中,我们肯定都更清楚这一点,但它确实值得重复。)这本书每章都有多幅全彩插图,在很多方面都是他前一本书《黑豹、绿巨人和铁心侠:漫威、多样性和21世纪超级英雄》的延续和扩展,它讲述了漫威的种族和民族代表性历史。和那本书一样,这本书研究得很好,有着重要文化理论家(劳拉·马尔维、琳达·威廉姆斯、亨利·詹金斯)的坚实基础,对该领域最近的工作有着明显的了解。威廉姆斯在这里受到了最多的欢呼;书中最引人注目的论点之一将超级英雄类型与威廉姆斯在作品中讨论的身体类型进行了比较。为此,第一章探讨了超级英雄身体作为阳具力量形象的作用方式;通过观察一个研究不足的作品——超级英雄色情模仿,以及漫画和色情行业之间的关系——布朗令人信服地认为,这一类型解决了霸权男子气概的社会不安全问题。以下几章涉及更广泛的性别和性话题——第三章将超级英雄同性恋社会空间与现实生活中的单身汉理想进行了比较,而第四章则讨论了超级英雄与家庭生活的传统不匹配。与其他章节一样,在这里,对该类型有问题的过去的研究为分析最近的叙事奠定了基础,这些叙事表明了一种渐进的转变。这在大多数章节中都是正确的(除了引言和结论外,还有九章),并有助于本书的积极基调,这表明,该类型主要是对社会变化的回应。与此相关的是,布朗在第七章中提出了一个有趣的观点,即寓言(多年来,这一类型一直被用作借口——多种解读是可能的,但区别不是现实世界中的字面意思)如何成为表现的障碍。这是书中最有力的观点之一,尤其是出于教学的目的——长期以来,流行文化一直依赖寓言和隐喻,而不利于更明确的身份表征。这与布朗压倒一切的论点密切相关,即只要在整个流派中触及象征的表面,就可以发现对性和性别的痴迷。当然,面具、伪装和双重身份的奖杯也起到了作用,布朗对此进行了详细讨论。在方法方面,这本书在很大程度上依赖于识别和分析视觉和叙事比喻,但他所识别的许多元素在其他地方没有得到深入研究。例如,在第九章中,对漫画中高潮、爆炸、射精和死亡的视觉代码进行了仔细的文本分析,布朗认为“超级英雄的小小死亡促进了创造、训练和胜利的可重复的英雄序列”(206)。同样,第五章确定了异性恋浪漫仪式的视觉代码,以及该类型将这些代码改编为酷儿关系叙事的方式。当然,其中一些要点是不言自明的,比如这一类型传统上拒绝让主人公享受婚姻和孩子的家庭舒适。但同样,这本书最有趣的收获之一是,该行业在多大程度上解决了布朗提出的问题。他最后讨论了粉丝们动员超级英雄表达和理解性别和性的方式。作为一个6岁女孩的父母,她穿着她的蜘蛛格温套装(配芭蕾舞短裙)参加了《蜘蛛侠:穿越蜘蛛诗》的首映式,我觉得最后一章关于角色扮演的讨论听起来是真实的;我们对超级英雄作为当前流行文化中占主导地位的通用语的体验往往掩盖了这些叙事在理解和表现身份方面所做的真正的社会工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Love, sex, gender and superheroesBy Jeffrey A. Brown, Rutgers University Press, 2022.

While scholarship on superheroes is prolific, Jeffrey A. Brown has succeeded several times in finding an as-yet-underexplored niche to unpack. In Love, Sex, Gender, and Superheroes, Brown delves into, in his words, “a range of issues about gender and sex that are modeled by superheroes, issues that are interconnected, shifting, progressive, conservative, and complex” (3). This clarity of objective characterizes his work in general, which is scholarly and incisive yet accessible to more than just an academic audience. His writing is ideal for teaching undergrads, asking them to think critically about the heroes who are often “assumed to be simple and innocent fun, not worthy of critical examination or reflection” (3). (At this point in the academic study of popular culture, surely we all know better, but it does bear repeating.)

This book, which has multiple full-color illustrations per chapter, is in many ways a continuation and expansion of his previous book, Panthers, Hulks, and Ironhearts: Marvel, Diversity, and the 21st Century Superhero, which addresses Marvel's history of racial and ethnic representation. Like that book, this one is well-researched, with a strong foundation of important cultural theorists (Laura Mulvey, Linda Williams, Henry Jenkins) and an evident understanding of recent work in the field. Williams gets the most shout-outs here; one of the most compelling arguments in the book draws a parallel between the superhero genre and the bodily genres Williams discusses in her work. To this end, the first chapter discusses the way in which the superhero body functions as an image of phallic power; by looking at an understudied body of work—superhero porn parodies, as well as the relationship between the comics and porn industries—Brown convincingly argues that the genre addresses social insecurity regarding hegemonic masculinity.

The following chapters address a wider spectrum of topics on gender and sexuality—Chapter Three compares superhero homosocial spaces to the real-life masculine ideal of the bachelor pad, while Chapter Four discusses the traditional mismatch of superheroes and domestic life. Here, as in other chapters, the examination of the genre's problematic past lays the groundwork for analysis of more recent narratives that suggest a progressive shift. This is true in most chapters (there are nine, in addition to the introduction and conclusion), and contributes to the positive tone of the book, which suggests that, mostly, the genre is responding to social change. Relatedly, Brown makes an interesting point in Chapter Seven about the ways in which allegory (which the genre has used as an excuse for many years—multiple readings are possible, but the difference is not real-world literal) becomes an obstacle to representation. This is one of the most powerful ideas in the book, especially for the purpose of teaching—that for so long, popular culture has relied upon allegory and metaphor, to the detriment of more explicit representations of identity.

This is closely related to Brown's overriding contention that one has only to scratch the surface of symbolism in the whole genre to find an obsession with sexuality and gender. Tropes of masks, disguises, and dual identities play into this, of course, and Brown discusses these in detail. In terms of method, the book relies heavily on identifying and analyzing visual and narrative tropes, but many of the elements he identifies have not been studied elsewhere in depth. For example, in Chapter Nine, the close textual analysis of visual codes in comics for orgasm, explosion, ejaculation, and death allows Brown to argue that “the superhero's little death facilitates a repeatable heroic sequence of creation, training, and victory” (206). Similarly, Chapter Five identifies visual codes for heterosexual romantic rituals and the ways in which the genre has adapted these codes for queer relationship narratives as well.

Of course, some of these main points are self-evident, like the assertion that the genre has traditionally denied its heroes the domestic comforts of marriage and children. But again, one of the most interesting takeaways from the book is the extent to which the industry is largely addressing the issues that Brown identifies. He concludes by discussing the ways fans mobilize superheroes in their expression and understanding of gender and sexuality. As the parent of a 6-year-old girl who wore her Spider-Gwen outfit (complete with tutu) to the premiere of Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse, I felt the final chapter's discussion of cosplay rang true; our experience of superheroes as a dominant lingua franca in current popular culture often obscures the real social work these narratives do in understanding and performing identity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Anti-Organization man: Donald E. Westlake's Parker novels May fortune's lantern burn serene: An analysis of golden age Halloween postcards as middle-class promotional culture Returning to the river: The Rephotographic Survey Project and the (im)possibility of capturing the same sites “Friend in Need”: Cultivating homosocial communities in Love Story Magazine's fiction and editorial departments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1