生成型人工智能与外科医生

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Surgical Practice Pub Date : 2023-08-26 DOI:10.1111/1744-1633.12648
Paul B. S. Lai
{"title":"生成型人工智能与外科医生","authors":"Paul B. S. Lai","doi":"10.1111/1744-1633.12648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer) is regarded as the prime mover of the digital revolution. The first version called GPT-1 was released in 2018 and in just a couple of years, the more recent versions have shown the platform to be exponentially powerful. Outside the medical world, the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools is increasingly common in marketing and sales, product and service development, and service operations. AI is also increasingly used in medicine and the application of AI in actual clinical services such as the interpretation of plain chest X-rays or certain pathology settings has opened up new possibilities as well as controversies within the medical profession. Some individuals who have tried ChatGPT consider it to be a slightly more advanced version of a ‘chatbot’, and they have noticed instances where it provides incorrect information or answers. However, a recent cross-sectional study has shown that a chatbot can generate better quality and more empathetic responses to patient questions than real physicians answering questions in an online forum. This editorial is not going to discuss the technical aspects of using ChatGPT or how to write ‘prompts’ that would enhance the ability of ChatGPT to generate something more desirable. Rather, I would like to raise a few possibilities where generative AI could help with surgical training.","PeriodicalId":51190,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Practice","volume":"27 3","pages":"128-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generative artificial intelligence and surgeons\",\"authors\":\"Paul B. S. Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1744-1633.12648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer) is regarded as the prime mover of the digital revolution. The first version called GPT-1 was released in 2018 and in just a couple of years, the more recent versions have shown the platform to be exponentially powerful. Outside the medical world, the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools is increasingly common in marketing and sales, product and service development, and service operations. AI is also increasingly used in medicine and the application of AI in actual clinical services such as the interpretation of plain chest X-rays or certain pathology settings has opened up new possibilities as well as controversies within the medical profession. Some individuals who have tried ChatGPT consider it to be a slightly more advanced version of a ‘chatbot’, and they have noticed instances where it provides incorrect information or answers. However, a recent cross-sectional study has shown that a chatbot can generate better quality and more empathetic responses to patient questions than real physicians answering questions in an online forum. This editorial is not going to discuss the technical aspects of using ChatGPT or how to write ‘prompts’ that would enhance the ability of ChatGPT to generate something more desirable. Rather, I would like to raise a few possibilities where generative AI could help with surgical training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Practice\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"128-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-1633.12648\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-1633.12648","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generative artificial intelligence and surgeons
ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer) is regarded as the prime mover of the digital revolution. The first version called GPT-1 was released in 2018 and in just a couple of years, the more recent versions have shown the platform to be exponentially powerful. Outside the medical world, the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools is increasingly common in marketing and sales, product and service development, and service operations. AI is also increasingly used in medicine and the application of AI in actual clinical services such as the interpretation of plain chest X-rays or certain pathology settings has opened up new possibilities as well as controversies within the medical profession. Some individuals who have tried ChatGPT consider it to be a slightly more advanced version of a ‘chatbot’, and they have noticed instances where it provides incorrect information or answers. However, a recent cross-sectional study has shown that a chatbot can generate better quality and more empathetic responses to patient questions than real physicians answering questions in an online forum. This editorial is not going to discuss the technical aspects of using ChatGPT or how to write ‘prompts’ that would enhance the ability of ChatGPT to generate something more desirable. Rather, I would like to raise a few possibilities where generative AI could help with surgical training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Practice
Surgical Practice 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Practice is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal, which is dedicated to the art and science of advances in clinical practice and research in surgery. Surgical Practice publishes papers in all fields of surgery and surgery-related disciplines. It consists of sections of history, leading articles, reviews, original papers, discussion papers, education, case reports, short notes on surgical techniques and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Author Index Full Oral Short oral Motion picture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1