缺乏时间:新冠肺炎大流行期间学生和教师对学术工作量认知的案例研究

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Engineering Education Pub Date : 2023-04-27 DOI:10.1002/jee.20525
Isabel Hilliger, Gabriel Astudillo, Jorge Baier
{"title":"缺乏时间:新冠肺炎大流行期间学生和教师对学术工作量认知的案例研究","authors":"Isabel Hilliger,&nbsp;Gabriel Astudillo,&nbsp;Jorge Baier","doi":"10.1002/jee.20525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To avoid the spread of COVID-19, most engineering programs rapidly shifted to emergency online education, and prior research has associated online education with academic overload. Before the pandemic, engineering curricula were already packed with content and course assignments, so more studies should explore how the unprecedented conditions of remote learning affected the intensive academic workload of engineering programs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose/Hypothesis</h3>\n \n <p>This study addresses the following research question: How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect the perceptions of engineering instructors and students regarding their academic workload? Thus, the main research objective is to explore the influence of COVID-19 on the perceived academic workload, extrapolating lessons learned for engineering education settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design/Method</h3>\n \n <p>During 2020, we developed a single-case study to understand academic workload in 22 engineering majors at a large Latin American university. We triangulated different sources of institutional and research-focused evidence, including two instructor surveys (<i>n</i> = 110), two student surveys (<i>n</i> = 2218), two student focus groups (<i>n</i> = 18), and workload measurement surveys (<i>n</i> = 3131).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both instructors and students experienced academic overload since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Throughout the first year, instructors became capable of accommodating course activities and assignments to students' particular circumstances. Regardless of these efforts, students continue perceiving academic overload, particularly affecting those who experience connectivity issues or frequent problems with their personal computer or tablet.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Further efforts are needed to support course planning and self-regulated learning in engineering education. In these lines, lessons learned were captured and shared to inform engineering education research and practice beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lacking time: A case study of student and faculty perceptions of academic workload in the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Hilliger,&nbsp;Gabriel Astudillo,&nbsp;Jorge Baier\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jee.20525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>To avoid the spread of COVID-19, most engineering programs rapidly shifted to emergency online education, and prior research has associated online education with academic overload. Before the pandemic, engineering curricula were already packed with content and course assignments, so more studies should explore how the unprecedented conditions of remote learning affected the intensive academic workload of engineering programs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose/Hypothesis</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study addresses the following research question: How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect the perceptions of engineering instructors and students regarding their academic workload? Thus, the main research objective is to explore the influence of COVID-19 on the perceived academic workload, extrapolating lessons learned for engineering education settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design/Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>During 2020, we developed a single-case study to understand academic workload in 22 engineering majors at a large Latin American university. We triangulated different sources of institutional and research-focused evidence, including two instructor surveys (<i>n</i> = 110), two student surveys (<i>n</i> = 2218), two student focus groups (<i>n</i> = 18), and workload measurement surveys (<i>n</i> = 3131).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both instructors and students experienced academic overload since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Throughout the first year, instructors became capable of accommodating course activities and assignments to students' particular circumstances. Regardless of these efforts, students continue perceiving academic overload, particularly affecting those who experience connectivity issues or frequent problems with their personal computer or tablet.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Further efforts are needed to support course planning and self-regulated learning in engineering education. In these lines, lessons learned were captured and shared to inform engineering education research and practice beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jee.20525\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jee.20525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景为了避免新冠肺炎的传播,大多数工程项目迅速转向紧急在线教育,先前的研究将在线教育与学术过载联系起来。在疫情之前,工程课程已经充满了内容和课程作业,因此应该有更多的研究来探索前所未有的远程学习条件如何影响工程项目的密集学术工作量。目的/假设本研究解决了以下研究问题:新冠肺炎大流行如何影响工程教员和学生对其学术工作量的看法?因此,主要研究目标是探索新冠肺炎对感知学术工作量的影响,推断工程教育环境中的经验教训。设计/方法在2020年,我们开发了一个单一的案例研究,以了解拉丁美洲一所大型大学22个工程专业的学术工作量。我们对机构和研究重点证据的不同来源进行了三角分析,包括两项教员调查(n = 110),两项学生调查(n = 2218),两个学生焦点小组(n = 18) 和工作量测量调查(n = 3131)。结果新冠肺炎疫情爆发以来,教师和学生都经历了学业超负荷。在第一年,教师能够根据学生的特殊情况安排课程活动和作业。尽管做出了这些努力,学生们仍会继续感到学业负担过重,尤其是那些个人电脑或平板电脑出现连接问题或频繁问题的学生。结论需要进一步努力支持工程教育中的课程规划和自主学习。在这些方面,吸取并分享了经验教训,为新冠肺炎大流行后的工程教育研究和实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lacking time: A case study of student and faculty perceptions of academic workload in the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

To avoid the spread of COVID-19, most engineering programs rapidly shifted to emergency online education, and prior research has associated online education with academic overload. Before the pandemic, engineering curricula were already packed with content and course assignments, so more studies should explore how the unprecedented conditions of remote learning affected the intensive academic workload of engineering programs.

Purpose/Hypothesis

This study addresses the following research question: How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect the perceptions of engineering instructors and students regarding their academic workload? Thus, the main research objective is to explore the influence of COVID-19 on the perceived academic workload, extrapolating lessons learned for engineering education settings.

Design/Method

During 2020, we developed a single-case study to understand academic workload in 22 engineering majors at a large Latin American university. We triangulated different sources of institutional and research-focused evidence, including two instructor surveys (n = 110), two student surveys (n = 2218), two student focus groups (n = 18), and workload measurement surveys (n = 3131).

Results

Both instructors and students experienced academic overload since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Throughout the first year, instructors became capable of accommodating course activities and assignments to students' particular circumstances. Regardless of these efforts, students continue perceiving academic overload, particularly affecting those who experience connectivity issues or frequent problems with their personal computer or tablet.

Conclusions

Further efforts are needed to support course planning and self-regulated learning in engineering education. In these lines, lessons learned were captured and shared to inform engineering education research and practice beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Education
Journal of Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) serves to cultivate, disseminate, and archive scholarly research in engineering education.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Celebrating outstanding publications and reviewers from the 2023 volume Professorial intentions of engineering PhDs from historically excluded groups: The influence of graduate school experiences Through their eyes: Understanding institutional factors that impact the transfer processes of Black engineering students An exploration of psychological safety and conflict in first-year engineering student teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1