胰十二指肠切除术后封闭切口负压创面治疗预防高危患者手术部位感染。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-10-24 Print Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.000723
Brittany Greene, Andrew Lagrotteria, Melanie E Tsang, Shiva Jayaraman
{"title":"胰十二指肠切除术后封闭切口负压创面治疗预防高危患者手术部位感染。","authors":"Brittany Greene,&nbsp;Andrew Lagrotteria,&nbsp;Melanie E Tsang,&nbsp;Shiva Jayaraman","doi":"10.1503/cjs.000723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common sources of morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgical site infections are associated with readmissions, prolonged length of stay, delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and negative effects on quality of life. Incisional vacuum-assisted closure (iVAC) devices applied on closed incisions may reduce SSI rates. The objective of this retrospective review is to evaluate the impact of iVAC on SSI rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a single institution who had at least 1 risk factor for SSI and who received an iVAC were compared with a historical cohort of high-risk patients who received conventional dressings after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The primary outcome was incidence of SSI within 30 days, abstracted from chart review. Secondary outcomes were 30-day readmission, 90-day mortality, rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula and rate of delayed gastric emptying.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 175 patients were included, of whom 61 received an iVAC. The incidence of SSI was 13% (8 of 61 patients) and 16% (18 of 114 patients) in the iVAC and conventional dressing groups, respectively (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.33-1.98). Preoperative biliary drainage was the most frequent SSI risk factor. Binary logistic regression using SSI as the outcome demonstrated no significant association with iVAC use when adjusted for SSI risk factors. There were no differences in rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying or 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This report describes the outcomes of the integration of iVAC devices into routine clinical practice at a high-volume institution. Application of this device after pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients at elevated risk of SSI was not associated with a reduction in the rate of SSIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"66 5","pages":"E507-E512"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/50/0c/066E507.PMC10609889.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for prevention of surgical site infections in high-risk patients.\",\"authors\":\"Brittany Greene,&nbsp;Andrew Lagrotteria,&nbsp;Melanie E Tsang,&nbsp;Shiva Jayaraman\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/cjs.000723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common sources of morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgical site infections are associated with readmissions, prolonged length of stay, delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and negative effects on quality of life. Incisional vacuum-assisted closure (iVAC) devices applied on closed incisions may reduce SSI rates. The objective of this retrospective review is to evaluate the impact of iVAC on SSI rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a single institution who had at least 1 risk factor for SSI and who received an iVAC were compared with a historical cohort of high-risk patients who received conventional dressings after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The primary outcome was incidence of SSI within 30 days, abstracted from chart review. Secondary outcomes were 30-day readmission, 90-day mortality, rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula and rate of delayed gastric emptying.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 175 patients were included, of whom 61 received an iVAC. The incidence of SSI was 13% (8 of 61 patients) and 16% (18 of 114 patients) in the iVAC and conventional dressing groups, respectively (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.33-1.98). Preoperative biliary drainage was the most frequent SSI risk factor. Binary logistic regression using SSI as the outcome demonstrated no significant association with iVAC use when adjusted for SSI risk factors. There were no differences in rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying or 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This report describes the outcomes of the integration of iVAC devices into routine clinical practice at a high-volume institution. Application of this device after pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients at elevated risk of SSI was not associated with a reduction in the rate of SSIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"66 5\",\"pages\":\"E507-E512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/50/0c/066E507.PMC10609889.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.000723\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.000723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术部位感染(SSI)是胰十二指肠切除术后最常见的发病源之一。手术部位感染与再次入院、住院时间延长、辅助化疗开始延迟以及对生活质量的负面影响有关。在闭合切口上应用切口真空辅助闭合(iVAC)装置可以降低SSI发生率。本回顾性综述的目的是评估iVAC对胰十二指肠切除术后SSI发生率的影响。方法:将一组在单一机构接受胰十二指肠切除术且至少有1个SSI风险因素并接受iVAC的患者与一组在胰十二指肠切除后接受常规敷料的历史高危患者进行比较。主要结果是30天内SSI的发生率,从图表审查中提取。次要结果为30天再次入院、90天死亡率、术后胰瘘发生率和胃排空延迟率。结果:共纳入175名患者,其中61人接受了iVAC。iVAC组和常规敷料组SSI的发生率分别为13%(8/61例)和16%(18/114例)(比值比0.81,95%置信区间0.33-1.98)。术前胆道引流是SSI最常见的危险因素。使用SSI作为结果的二元逻辑回归显示,在调整SSI风险因素时,与iVAC的使用没有显著关联。术后胰瘘、胃排空延迟或90天死亡率没有差异。结论:本报告描述了在大容量机构将iVAC设备整合到常规临床实践中的结果。对于SSI风险较高的患者,在胰十二指肠切除术后应用该装置与SSI发生率的降低无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for prevention of surgical site infections in high-risk patients.

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common sources of morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgical site infections are associated with readmissions, prolonged length of stay, delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and negative effects on quality of life. Incisional vacuum-assisted closure (iVAC) devices applied on closed incisions may reduce SSI rates. The objective of this retrospective review is to evaluate the impact of iVAC on SSI rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Methods: A cohort of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a single institution who had at least 1 risk factor for SSI and who received an iVAC were compared with a historical cohort of high-risk patients who received conventional dressings after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The primary outcome was incidence of SSI within 30 days, abstracted from chart review. Secondary outcomes were 30-day readmission, 90-day mortality, rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula and rate of delayed gastric emptying.

Results: In total, 175 patients were included, of whom 61 received an iVAC. The incidence of SSI was 13% (8 of 61 patients) and 16% (18 of 114 patients) in the iVAC and conventional dressing groups, respectively (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.33-1.98). Preoperative biliary drainage was the most frequent SSI risk factor. Binary logistic regression using SSI as the outcome demonstrated no significant association with iVAC use when adjusted for SSI risk factors. There were no differences in rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying or 90-day mortality.

Conclusion: This report describes the outcomes of the integration of iVAC devices into routine clinical practice at a high-volume institution. Application of this device after pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients at elevated risk of SSI was not associated with a reduction in the rate of SSIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
期刊最新文献
2024 Canadian Surgery Forum: Sept. 25-28, 2024. Incidence and timing of postoperative complications after total hip and knee arthroplasty. The impact of COVID-19 on pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes in a hepatopancreatobiliary centre of excellence. Canadian Spine Society: 24th Annual Scientific Conference, Wednesday, February 28 - Saturday, March 2, Fairmont Chateau Whistler, Whistler, B.C., Canada. Reasons for 90-day emergency department visits after primary knee arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1