数字外化的认知架构

IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Educational Psychology Review Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1007/s10648-023-09818-1
Alexander Skulmowski
{"title":"数字外化的认知架构","authors":"Alexander Skulmowski","doi":"10.1007/s10648-023-09818-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This review is aimed at synthesizing current findings concerning technology-based cognitive offloading and the associated effects on learning and memory. While cognitive externalization (i.e., using the environment to outsource mental computation) is a highly useful technique in various problem-solving tasks, a growing body of research suggests that the offloading of information into the environment (and digital storage in particular) can have negative effects on learning. Based on this review, a model of offloading with cognitive load at its core is developed to summarize when learners offload information. A high intrinsic cognitive load (i.e., a high difficulty), a high extraneous load (i.e., unnecessary design elements), and a low perceived or actual working memory capacity trigger offloading. Crucially, the value attributed to information also affects whether information is externalized. In this model, extraneous cognitive load in the design of technology-enhanced learning acts as a triple barrier: (1) It prevents information from entering working memory, (2) it inhibits information being stored in long-term memory, and (3) it can prevent learners from externalizing information using technology. As a result, in many instances, only the gist of information (or its location) is retained, while learners often gain the illusion of having memorized that information. Furthermore, offloading substantially increases the risk of memory manipulation, potentially posing a societal problem. Consequently, educational approaches should maximize the meaningfulness of the residual information that is often retained in the form of “biological pointers.” In addition, current issues surrounding the use of generative artificial intelligence pertaining to externalization are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"83 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Skulmowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10648-023-09818-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This review is aimed at synthesizing current findings concerning technology-based cognitive offloading and the associated effects on learning and memory. While cognitive externalization (i.e., using the environment to outsource mental computation) is a highly useful technique in various problem-solving tasks, a growing body of research suggests that the offloading of information into the environment (and digital storage in particular) can have negative effects on learning. Based on this review, a model of offloading with cognitive load at its core is developed to summarize when learners offload information. A high intrinsic cognitive load (i.e., a high difficulty), a high extraneous load (i.e., unnecessary design elements), and a low perceived or actual working memory capacity trigger offloading. Crucially, the value attributed to information also affects whether information is externalized. In this model, extraneous cognitive load in the design of technology-enhanced learning acts as a triple barrier: (1) It prevents information from entering working memory, (2) it inhibits information being stored in long-term memory, and (3) it can prevent learners from externalizing information using technology. As a result, in many instances, only the gist of information (or its location) is retained, while learners often gain the illusion of having memorized that information. Furthermore, offloading substantially increases the risk of memory manipulation, potentially posing a societal problem. Consequently, educational approaches should maximize the meaningfulness of the residual information that is often retained in the form of “biological pointers.” In addition, current issues surrounding the use of generative artificial intelligence pertaining to externalization are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"83 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09818-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09818-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文综述了基于技术的认知卸载及其对学习和记忆的影响。虽然认知外化(即利用环境外包心理计算)在各种解决问题的任务中是一种非常有用的技术,但越来越多的研究表明,将信息卸载到环境中(特别是数字存储)可能对学习产生负面影响。在此基础上,本文建立了一个以认知负荷为核心的卸载模型来总结学习者卸载信息的过程。高内在认知负荷(即高难度)、高外部负荷(即不必要的设计元素)以及低感知或实际工作记忆容量会触发卸载。至关重要的是,赋予信息的价值也会影响信息是否外部化。在这个模型中,技术增强学习设计中的外来认知负荷起到三重障碍的作用:(1)它阻止信息进入工作记忆,(2)它抑制信息存储在长期记忆中,(3)它可以阻止学习者使用技术将信息外化。因此,在许多情况下,只有信息的要点(或其位置)被保留下来,而学习者经常获得已经记住该信息的错觉。此外,卸载大大增加了内存被操纵的风险,潜在地引发了一个社会问题。因此,教育方法应该最大限度地发挥通常以“生物指针”形式保留的剩余信息的意义。此外,还讨论了当前围绕外部化使用生成人工智能的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization

This review is aimed at synthesizing current findings concerning technology-based cognitive offloading and the associated effects on learning and memory. While cognitive externalization (i.e., using the environment to outsource mental computation) is a highly useful technique in various problem-solving tasks, a growing body of research suggests that the offloading of information into the environment (and digital storage in particular) can have negative effects on learning. Based on this review, a model of offloading with cognitive load at its core is developed to summarize when learners offload information. A high intrinsic cognitive load (i.e., a high difficulty), a high extraneous load (i.e., unnecessary design elements), and a low perceived or actual working memory capacity trigger offloading. Crucially, the value attributed to information also affects whether information is externalized. In this model, extraneous cognitive load in the design of technology-enhanced learning acts as a triple barrier: (1) It prevents information from entering working memory, (2) it inhibits information being stored in long-term memory, and (3) it can prevent learners from externalizing information using technology. As a result, in many instances, only the gist of information (or its location) is retained, while learners often gain the illusion of having memorized that information. Furthermore, offloading substantially increases the risk of memory manipulation, potentially posing a societal problem. Consequently, educational approaches should maximize the meaningfulness of the residual information that is often retained in the form of “biological pointers.” In addition, current issues surrounding the use of generative artificial intelligence pertaining to externalization are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
On Being Accepted: Interrogating How University Cultural Scripts Shape Personal and Political Facets of Belonging Linking Disparate Strands: A Critical Review of the Relationship Between Creativity and Education Exploring the Nature-Creativity Connection Across Different Settings: A Scoping Review Bold, Humble, Collaborative, and Virtuous: The Future of Theory Development in Educational Psychology Effects of School-led Greenspace Interventions on Mental, Physical and Social Wellbeing in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1