反思的好处促使在线编程课程中通过提示鼓励学习

IF 6.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Internet and Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100903
Heeryung Choi , Jelena Jovanovic , Oleksandra Poquet , Christopher Brooks , Srećko Joksimović , Joseph Jay Williams
{"title":"反思的好处促使在线编程课程中通过提示鼓励学习","authors":"Heeryung Choi ,&nbsp;Jelena Jovanovic ,&nbsp;Oleksandra Poquet ,&nbsp;Christopher Brooks ,&nbsp;Srećko Joksimović ,&nbsp;Joseph Jay Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While giving learners hints is a commonly used scaffolding practice to facilitate learning, previous work questioned the effectiveness of hints. In this study, we examined if prompting learners to reflect along with receiving hints could improve learning outcomes, including immediate and delayed performance, perceived learning, and enjoyment. A field experiment was conducted in a four-week long online master’s degree course on data science where we compared two conditions: a condition with hints and a condition providing reflection prompts along with hints. Results showed that using hints with reflection prompts increased learner performance in delayed knowledge transfer tasks while also increasing learners’ perception of learning. The combination of reflection prompts and hints did not reduce learners’ enjoyment of the tasks, suggesting that the use of hints with reflection prompts is not only an intervention which can improve learning outcomes but is one which will be naturally adopted by learners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 100903"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The benefit of reflection prompts for encouraging learning with hints in an online programming course\",\"authors\":\"Heeryung Choi ,&nbsp;Jelena Jovanovic ,&nbsp;Oleksandra Poquet ,&nbsp;Christopher Brooks ,&nbsp;Srećko Joksimović ,&nbsp;Joseph Jay Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While giving learners hints is a commonly used scaffolding practice to facilitate learning, previous work questioned the effectiveness of hints. In this study, we examined if prompting learners to reflect along with receiving hints could improve learning outcomes, including immediate and delayed performance, perceived learning, and enjoyment. A field experiment was conducted in a four-week long online master’s degree course on data science where we compared two conditions: a condition with hints and a condition providing reflection prompts along with hints. Results showed that using hints with reflection prompts increased learner performance in delayed knowledge transfer tasks while also increasing learners’ perception of learning. The combination of reflection prompts and hints did not reduce learners’ enjoyment of the tasks, suggesting that the use of hints with reflection prompts is not only an intervention which can improve learning outcomes but is one which will be naturally adopted by learners.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751623000015\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751623000015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然给学习者暗示是一种常用的脚手架练习,以促进学习,但之前的工作对暗示的有效性提出了质疑。在这项研究中,我们检验了促使学习者在接受暗示的同时进行反思是否可以改善学习结果,包括即时和延迟的表现、感知的学习和享受。在为期四周的数据科学在线硕士学位课程中进行了一项实地实验,我们比较了两种条件:一种是有提示的条件,另一种是提供反思提示和提示的条件。结果表明,将提示与反思提示结合使用可以提高学习者在延迟知识转移任务中的表现,同时也提高了学习者的学习感知。反思提示和暗示的结合并没有降低学习者对任务的享受,这表明将暗示与反思提示结合使用不仅是一种可以改善学习结果的干预措施,而且是学习者自然会采用的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The benefit of reflection prompts for encouraging learning with hints in an online programming course

While giving learners hints is a commonly used scaffolding practice to facilitate learning, previous work questioned the effectiveness of hints. In this study, we examined if prompting learners to reflect along with receiving hints could improve learning outcomes, including immediate and delayed performance, perceived learning, and enjoyment. A field experiment was conducted in a four-week long online master’s degree course on data science where we compared two conditions: a condition with hints and a condition providing reflection prompts along with hints. Results showed that using hints with reflection prompts increased learner performance in delayed knowledge transfer tasks while also increasing learners’ perception of learning. The combination of reflection prompts and hints did not reduce learners’ enjoyment of the tasks, suggesting that the use of hints with reflection prompts is not only an intervention which can improve learning outcomes but is one which will be naturally adopted by learners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internet and Higher Education
Internet and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The Internet and Higher Education is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal focused on contemporary issues and future trends in online learning, teaching, and administration within post-secondary education. It welcomes contributions from diverse academic disciplines worldwide and provides a platform for theory papers, research studies, critical essays, editorials, reviews, case studies, and social commentary.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The paradox of self-efficacy and technological dependence: Unraveling generative AI's impact on university students' task completion Prior online learning experiences as incidental professional development: A cross-sectional survey of online instructor beliefs and strategies Interaction and dialogue: Integration and application of artificial intelligence in blended mode writing feedback A situated expectancy-value theoretical perspective of teaching presence and student engagement in blended learning environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1