一个值得奋斗的人？形式化新手教师入职培训项目研究的荟萃分析

IF 9.6 1区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Research Review Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100505

Jeffrey Keese , Christopher G. Thompson , Hersh C. Waxman , Karen McIntush , Megan Svajda-Hardy

{"title":"一个值得奋斗的人？形式化新手教师入职培训项目研究的荟萃分析","authors":"Jeffrey Keese , Christopher G. Thompson , Hersh C. Waxman , Karen McIntush , Megan Svajda-Hardy","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>This meta-analysis evaluates research literature published from 2010 to 2019 on the topics of novice teacher induction and mentoring programs. Findings included that, overall, induction and mentoring programs had statistically significant effects on teacher and student outcomes such as retention, efficacy, and achievement (Intervention studies: <math><mrow><msub><mover><mi>θ</mi><mo>ˆ</mo></mover><mi>i</mi></msub></mrow></math> = 0.166, p = .036; Correlational studies: <math><mrow><msub><mover><mi>θ</mi><mo>ˆ</mo></mover><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math> = 0.273, p < .001). Additional analyses revealed that the “comprehensiveness” of these induction programs did not significantly predict higher effects. Last, effects seen in the important Glazerman et al. (2010) study were found to be significantly lower than those observed in other similar studies.</div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Worthwhile Endeavor? A meta-analysis of research on formalized novice teacher induction programs\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Keese , Christopher G. Thompson , Hersh C. Waxman , Karen McIntush , Megan Svajda-Hardy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>This meta-analysis evaluates research literature published from 2010 to 2019 on the topics of novice teacher induction and mentoring programs. Findings included that, overall, induction and mentoring programs had statistically significant effects on teacher and student outcomes such as retention, efficacy, and achievement (Intervention studies: <math><mrow><msub><mover><mi>θ</mi><mo>ˆ</mo></mover><mi>i</mi></msub></mrow></math> = 0.166, p = .036; Correlational studies: <math><mrow><msub><mover><mi>θ</mi><mo>ˆ</mo></mover><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math> = 0.273, p < .001). Additional analyses revealed that the “comprehensiveness” of these induction programs did not significantly predict higher effects. Last, effects seen in the important Glazerman et al. (2010) study were found to be significantly lower than those observed in other similar studies.</div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X22000744\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X22000744","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这项荟萃分析评估了2010年至2019年发表的关于新手教师入职培训和辅导计划的研究文献。研究结果包括，总体而言，入职培训和辅导计划对教师和学生的成绩（如保留率、效能、，和成就（干预研究：θξi=0.166，p=.036；相关研究：θΓc=0.273，p<；.001）。其他分析表明，这些诱导计划的“全面性”并不能显著预测更高的效果。最后，在重要的Glazerman等人（2010）的研究中发现的影响显著低于在其他类似研究中观察到的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

A Worthwhile Endeavor? A meta-analysis of research on formalized novice teacher induction programs

This meta-analysis evaluates research literature published from 2010 to 2019 on the topics of novice teacher induction and mentoring programs. Findings included that, overall, induction and mentoring programs had statistically significant effects on teacher and student outcomes such as retention, efficacy, and achievement (Intervention studies: ${\hat{θ}}_{i}$ = 0.166, p = .036; Correlational studies: ${\hat{θ}}_{c}$ = 0.273, p < .001). Additional analyses revealed that the “comprehensiveness” of these induction programs did not significantly predict higher effects. Last, effects seen in the important Glazerman et al. (2010) study were found to be significantly lower than those observed in other similar studies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

19.40

自引率

0.90%

发文量

审稿时长

57 days

期刊介绍： Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.