建造剧院,制定政策:利物浦紫门的物质性和文化民主

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER Studies in Theatre and Performance Pub Date : 2022-09-17 DOI:10.1080/14682761.2022.2121027
Karl Falconer, Steven Hadley, Jon Moorhouse
{"title":"建造剧院,制定政策:利物浦紫门的物质性和文化民主","authors":"Karl Falconer, Steven Hadley, Jon Moorhouse","doi":"10.1080/14682761.2022.2121027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>This article approaches the idea of architecture, theatre and cultural democracy as relational concepts, and considers the theatre building as a cultural artefact which both manifests and embodies power relations. We use the case study of Liverpool’s PurpleDoor to explore this idea. We consider theatre buildings as cultural artefacts to focus attention on the impact of material or physical factors and the power of cultural institutions to orient specific forms of behaviour and activity around themselves. In seeing architectural design as an embodiment of politics, philosophy and cultural policy, the article considers both the practical and theoretical dimensions of the future of a theatre architecture concerned with cultural democracy. The interconnection between political ideas of theatre’s contemporary social role and the material construction of the building – <i>the performative nature of the performance space</i> – become vital in recognising and re-prioritising values designed to address the intersectional nature of power systems afflicting the cultural sector and enabling citizen usage of cultural space. The article situates PurpleDoor in an historical lineage which articulates the aspiration to become both a site for critical inquiry and a contemporary manifestation of cultural democracy for 21<sup>st</sup> century British theatre.</p>","PeriodicalId":42067,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Theatre and Performance","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building theatre, making policy: materiality and cultural democracy at Liverpool’s PurpleDoor\",\"authors\":\"Karl Falconer, Steven Hadley, Jon Moorhouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14682761.2022.2121027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>This article approaches the idea of architecture, theatre and cultural democracy as relational concepts, and considers the theatre building as a cultural artefact which both manifests and embodies power relations. We use the case study of Liverpool’s PurpleDoor to explore this idea. We consider theatre buildings as cultural artefacts to focus attention on the impact of material or physical factors and the power of cultural institutions to orient specific forms of behaviour and activity around themselves. In seeing architectural design as an embodiment of politics, philosophy and cultural policy, the article considers both the practical and theoretical dimensions of the future of a theatre architecture concerned with cultural democracy. The interconnection between political ideas of theatre’s contemporary social role and the material construction of the building – <i>the performative nature of the performance space</i> – become vital in recognising and re-prioritising values designed to address the intersectional nature of power systems afflicting the cultural sector and enabling citizen usage of cultural space. The article situates PurpleDoor in an historical lineage which articulates the aspiration to become both a site for critical inquiry and a contemporary manifestation of cultural democracy for 21<sup>st</sup> century British theatre.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Theatre and Performance\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Theatre and Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2022.2121027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Theatre and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2022.2121027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文将建筑、剧院和文化民主作为关系概念进行探讨,认为剧院建筑是一种既体现又体现权力关系的文化产物。我们以利物浦的PurpleDoor为例来探讨这一观点。我们将剧院建筑视为文化文物,将注意力集中在物质或物理因素的影响上,以及文化机构对自身周围特定形式的行为和活动的影响。在将建筑设计视为政治、哲学和文化政策的体现时,本文从实践和理论两个方面考虑了剧院建筑与文化民主的未来。剧院当代社会角色的政治理念与建筑的物质结构之间的相互联系——表演空间的表演性质——对于认识和重新确定价值至关重要,这些价值旨在解决影响文化部门的电力系统的交叉性质,并使公民能够使用文化空间。这篇文章将PurpleDoor置于一个历史谱系中,它阐明了成为21世纪英国戏剧批判性探究和文化民主当代表现的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Building theatre, making policy: materiality and cultural democracy at Liverpool’s PurpleDoor

ABSTRACT

This article approaches the idea of architecture, theatre and cultural democracy as relational concepts, and considers the theatre building as a cultural artefact which both manifests and embodies power relations. We use the case study of Liverpool’s PurpleDoor to explore this idea. We consider theatre buildings as cultural artefacts to focus attention on the impact of material or physical factors and the power of cultural institutions to orient specific forms of behaviour and activity around themselves. In seeing architectural design as an embodiment of politics, philosophy and cultural policy, the article considers both the practical and theoretical dimensions of the future of a theatre architecture concerned with cultural democracy. The interconnection between political ideas of theatre’s contemporary social role and the material construction of the building – the performative nature of the performance space – become vital in recognising and re-prioritising values designed to address the intersectional nature of power systems afflicting the cultural sector and enabling citizen usage of cultural space. The article situates PurpleDoor in an historical lineage which articulates the aspiration to become both a site for critical inquiry and a contemporary manifestation of cultural democracy for 21st century British theatre.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Meaningful agency in participatory performance: a contextual approach Irish rebellion in-yer-face or consigned to history: Seán O’Casey’s The Plough and the Stars in 2016 Physical solidarity as feeling the feeling Daughters Opera: an epistemic representation of feminist solidarities Hyper-femininity as radical resistance: re-envisaging the starlet through a feminist practice of solidarity in It’s Sophie! (2018)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1