抗议营地的有效基础设施:寻求庇护者的“生存权”运动

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Review Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1177/00380261221102025
Lena Näre, Maija Jokela
{"title":"抗议营地的有效基础设施:寻求庇护者的“生存权”运动","authors":"Lena Näre, Maija Jokela","doi":"10.1177/00380261221102025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, we develop the concept of <i>affective infrastructure</i> as the entanglement of affects, meanings and materiality to analyse protest camps as a specific organisational form of social and political movement. Drawing on two ethnographic research projects investigating an asylum seekers’ protest camp in Helsinki, Finland, we argue that affects can be understood as having an infrastructural quality. The article contributes to research on affective politics by empirically studying the affective infrastructure of a protest camp. We distinguish between three interrelated dimensions of the affective infrastructure of a protest camp. First, affects are mobilised to mediate place-related meanings, the alteration of which is crucial to all protest camps. Second, affects are involved in creating the social space and atmosphere necessary to sustain a long-lasting protest. Third, affects impress themselves on abstract objects and ideas that must be managed as a part of the protest’s political message. Affects not only join subjects and objects together but also divide them, illustrating that an infrastructure becomes visible when it staggers or fails.</p>","PeriodicalId":48250,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Review","volume":"49 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The affective infrastructure of a protest camp: Asylum seekers’ ‘Right to Live’ movement\",\"authors\":\"Lena Näre, Maija Jokela\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00380261221102025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this article, we develop the concept of <i>affective infrastructure</i> as the entanglement of affects, meanings and materiality to analyse protest camps as a specific organisational form of social and political movement. Drawing on two ethnographic research projects investigating an asylum seekers’ protest camp in Helsinki, Finland, we argue that affects can be understood as having an infrastructural quality. The article contributes to research on affective politics by empirically studying the affective infrastructure of a protest camp. We distinguish between three interrelated dimensions of the affective infrastructure of a protest camp. First, affects are mobilised to mediate place-related meanings, the alteration of which is crucial to all protest camps. Second, affects are involved in creating the social space and atmosphere necessary to sustain a long-lasting protest. Third, affects impress themselves on abstract objects and ideas that must be managed as a part of the protest’s political message. Affects not only join subjects and objects together but also divide them, illustrating that an infrastructure becomes visible when it staggers or fails.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological Review\",\"volume\":\"49 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221102025\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221102025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在本文中,我们将情感基础设施的概念发展为情感,意义和物质性的纠缠,以分析抗议营地作为社会和政治运动的特定组织形式。根据对芬兰赫尔辛基的一个寻求庇护者抗议营地进行调查的两个人种学研究项目,我们认为影响可以被理解为具有基础设施质量。本文通过实证研究抗议营地的情感基础设施,为情感政治的研究做出贡献。我们区分了抗议营地情感基础设施的三个相互关联的维度。首先,影响被调动来调解与地点相关的意义,对所有抗议阵营来说,改变这些意义都是至关重要的。其次,影响涉及创造维持长期抗议所必需的社会空间和氛围。第三,影响会在抽象的物体和思想上留下深刻印象,这些必须作为抗议政治信息的一部分加以管理。影响不仅将主体和对象连接在一起,而且还将它们分开,说明当一个基础结构错开或失败时,它变得可见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The affective infrastructure of a protest camp: Asylum seekers’ ‘Right to Live’ movement

In this article, we develop the concept of affective infrastructure as the entanglement of affects, meanings and materiality to analyse protest camps as a specific organisational form of social and political movement. Drawing on two ethnographic research projects investigating an asylum seekers’ protest camp in Helsinki, Finland, we argue that affects can be understood as having an infrastructural quality. The article contributes to research on affective politics by empirically studying the affective infrastructure of a protest camp. We distinguish between three interrelated dimensions of the affective infrastructure of a protest camp. First, affects are mobilised to mediate place-related meanings, the alteration of which is crucial to all protest camps. Second, affects are involved in creating the social space and atmosphere necessary to sustain a long-lasting protest. Third, affects impress themselves on abstract objects and ideas that must be managed as a part of the protest’s political message. Affects not only join subjects and objects together but also divide them, illustrating that an infrastructure becomes visible when it staggers or fails.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Review
Sociological Review SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Sociological Review has been publishing high quality and innovative articles for over 100 years. During this time we have steadfastly remained a general sociological journal, selecting papers of immediate and lasting significance. Covering all branches of the discipline, including criminology, education, gender, medicine, and organization, our tradition extends to research that is anthropological or philosophical in orientation and analytical or ethnographic in approach. We focus on questions that shape the nature and scope of sociology as well as those that address the changing forms and impact of social relations. In saying this we are not soliciting papers that seek to prescribe methods or dictate perspectives for the discipline. In opening up frontiers and publishing leading-edge research, we see these heterodox issues being settled and unsettled over time by virtue of contributors keeping the debates that occupy sociologists vital and relevant.
期刊最新文献
Suicide as slow death: towards a haunted sociology of suicide. Who counts in poverty research? Varieties of alternativeness: Relational practices in collaborative housing in Vienna Grieving academic grant rejections: Examining funding failure and experiences of loss Movement meaning of money: Monetary mobilization in Hong Kong’s prodemocracy movement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1